Meyer Kristina, Garzón Benjamín, Lövdén Martin, Hildebrandt Andrea
Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Aging Research Center, NVS Department, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Tomtebodavägen 18A, 17165 Stockholm, Sweden.
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jul 31;6(7):180857. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180857. eCollection 2019 Jul.
Face cognition (FC) is a specific ability that cannot be fully explained by general cognitive functions. Cortical thickness (CT) is a neural correlate of performance and learning. In this registered report, we used data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) to investigate the relationship between CT in the core brain network of FC and performance on a psychometric task battery, including tasks with facial content. Using structural equation modelling (SEM), we tested the existence of face-specific interindividual differences at behavioural and neural levels. The measurement models include general and face-specific factors of performance and CT. There was no face-specificity in CT in functionally localized areas. In analyses, we compared the preregistered, small regions of interest (ROIs) to larger, non-individualized ROIs and identified a face-specific CT factor when large ROIs were considered. We show that this was probably due to low reliability of CT in the functional localization (intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) between 0.72 and 0.85). Furthermore, general cognitive ability, but not face-specific performance, could be predicted by latent factors of CT with a small effect size. In conclusion, for the core brain network of FC, we provide exploratory evidence (in need of cross-validation) that areas of the cortex sharing a functional purpose did also share morphological properties as measured by CT.
面部认知(FC)是一种无法完全由一般认知功能解释的特定能力。皮质厚度(CT)是表现和学习的神经关联指标。在本预注册报告中,我们使用了人类连接体项目(HCP)的数据,以研究FC核心脑网络中的CT与一组心理测量任务(包括具有面部内容的任务)的表现之间的关系。我们使用结构方程模型(SEM),在行为和神经层面测试了特定于面部的个体间差异的存在情况。测量模型包括表现和CT的一般因素及特定于面部的因素。在功能定位区域的CT中不存在面部特异性。在分析中,我们将预注册的小兴趣区域(ROI)与更大的、非个体化的ROI进行了比较,并且在考虑大ROI时确定了一个特定于面部的CT因素。我们表明,这可能是由于功能定位中CT的可靠性较低(组内相关系数(ICC)在0.72至0.85之间)。此外,CT的潜在因素可以预测一般认知能力,但不能预测特定于面部的表现,效应量较小。总之,对于FC的核心脑网络,我们提供了探索性证据(需要交叉验证),即具有相同功能目的的皮质区域在通过CT测量时也具有相同的形态学特性。