• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of corneal curvature parameters obtained from two different instruments-Pentacam and VX120.两种不同仪器(眼前节分析仪Pentacam和VX120)所获得的角膜曲率参数的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 18;12(8):1311-1316. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.08.12. eCollection 2019.
2
Agreement of corneal curvature and central corneal thickness obtained from a swept-source OCT and Pentacam in ectopia lentis patients.晶状体异位患者中使用扫频源光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和Pentacam测量获得的角膜曲率和中央角膜厚度的一致性
Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 18;13(8):1244-1249. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.08.10. eCollection 2020.
3
[Comparison of corneal refractive power and astigmatism measured by the new anterior segment optical coherence tomographic device and Scheimpflug imaging device in age-related cataract patients].[新型眼前节光学相干断层扫描设备与Scheimpflug成像设备测量年龄相关性白内障患者角膜屈光力和散光的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 11;57(1):48-55. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200904-00574.
4
Validation of refraction and anterior segment parameters by a new multi-diagnostic platform (VX120).通过新型多诊断平台(VX120)对验光和眼前节参数进行验证。
J Optom. 2018 Oct-Dec;11(4):242-251. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
5
Comparison of a new anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Oculus Pentacam for measurement of anterior chamber depth and corneal thickness.新型眼前节光学相干断层扫描与欧科路三维眼前节分析系统测量前房深度和角膜厚度的比较
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jul;8(14):857. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-187.
6
Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameter Measurements With CASIA 2 and IOLMaster 700.眼前节参数测量结果与CASIA 2和IOLMaster 700的一致性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 11;9:777443. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.777443. eCollection 2022.
7
[Comparison of keratometric measurements obtained by the Verion image guided system with the IOLMaster and the Pentacam before cataract extraction surgery].[白内障摘除术前通过Verion图像引导系统与IOLMaster及Pentacam获得的角膜曲率测量值的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jan 11;56(1):47-52. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2020.01.012.
8
Corneal Topographic and Aberrometric Measurements Obtained with a Multidiagnostic Device in Healthy Eyes: Intrasession Repeatability.使用多诊断设备在健康眼睛中进行的角膜地形图和像差测量:测量期间的重复性
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:2149145. doi: 10.1155/2017/2149145. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
9
Comparison of a New Swept-Source Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and a Scheimpflug Camera for Measurement of Corneal Curvature.新型扫频源眼前节光学相干断层扫描与Scheimpflug 相机测量角膜曲率的比较。
Cornea. 2020 Jul;39(7):818-822. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002280.
10
Comparison of Anterior Segment Parameters and Axial Length Using Two Scheimpflug Devices with Integrated Optical Biometers.使用两种集成光学生物测量仪的眼前节参数与眼轴长度的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 23;14:3487-3494. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S278701. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
A prospective comparison of Scheimpflug-based anterior segment imaging systems in normal and abnormal corneas: Oculus Pentacam vs. Remidio Visionix VX650.基于Scheimpflug原理的眼前节成像系统在正常和异常角膜中的前瞻性比较:Oculus Pentacam与Remidio Visionix VX650对比
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 19;5:1516423. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2025.1516423. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of Three Different Devices for the Evaluation of Axial Length, Refractive Error, and Keratometry.三种不同设备评估眼轴长度、屈光不正和角膜曲率的比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2023 Aug 1;100(8):557-563. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002022. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Anterior chamber depth - a predictor of refractive outcomes after age-related cataract surgery.前房深度 - 与年龄相关性白内障手术后屈光结果的预测因素。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1144-8.
2
Intrasession repeatability of refractive and ocular aberrometric measurements obtained using a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes.使用多诊断设备在健康眼睛中获得的屈光和眼像差测量的测量期间重复性。
Clin Optom (Auckl). 2017 May 4;9:91-96. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S132572. eCollection 2017.
3
Cornea and anterior eye assessment with placido-disc keratoscopy, slit scanning evaluation topography and scheimpflug imaging tomography.角膜和眼前节评估的角膜地形图、扫描检眼镜评估地形和共焦激光角膜显微镜成像断层扫描。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;66(3):360-366. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_850_17.
4
Applications of corneal topography and tomography: a review.角膜地形学和断层摄影术的应用:综述。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;46(2):133-146. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13136. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
5
Corneal Topographic and Aberrometric Measurements Obtained with a Multidiagnostic Device in Healthy Eyes: Intrasession Repeatability.使用多诊断设备在健康眼睛中进行的角膜地形图和像差测量:测量期间的重复性
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:2149145. doi: 10.1155/2017/2149145. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
6
Assessment of corneal curvature using verion optical imaging system: a comparative study.使用Verion光学成像系统评估角膜曲率:一项对比研究。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;44(5):369-76. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12687. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
7
Effect of posterior corneal astigmatism on power calculation and alignment of toric intraocular lenses: Comparison of methodologies.角膜后表面散光对散光型人工晶状体屈光力计算及定位的影响:方法学比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Feb;42(2):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.036.
8
Intrasubject repeatability of corneal power, thickness, and wavefront aberrations with a new version of a dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido system.使用新型双旋转Scheimpflug-Placido系统测量角膜屈光力、厚度和波前像差的受试者内重复性
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jan;41(1):186-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.037. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
9
Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement between three different Scheimpflug systems in measuring corneal and anterior segment biometry.三种不同 Scheimpflug 系统测量角膜和眼前节生物测量的重复性、可再现性和一致性。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Sep;30(9):616-21. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140815-02.
10
Overview of the repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of the biometry values provided by various ophthalmic devices.各种眼科设备提供的生物测量值的重复性、再现性和一致性概述。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;158(6):1111-1120.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

两种不同仪器(眼前节分析仪Pentacam和VX120)所获得的角膜曲率参数的比较。

Comparison of corneal curvature parameters obtained from two different instruments-Pentacam and VX120.

作者信息

Zhang Qing-Wei, Zhai Chang-Bin, Ma Dong-Li

机构信息

Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology; Beijing Tongren Eye Center; Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 18;12(8):1311-1316. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.08.12. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.18240/ijo.2019.08.12
PMID:31456922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6694053/
Abstract

AIM

To explore whether the same corneal curvature parameters and anterior chamber depth measured by Pentacam and VX120 have a good consistency and can replace each other.

METHODS

This study enrolled 140 eyes of 70 patients ranging in age from 19 to 53y. All eyes underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination including an anterior segment analysis with the VX120 system (Visionix-Luneau Technologies, Chartres, France) and Pentacam (Oculus Optikgerate GmbH) respectively. The comparison on corneal curvature parameters was done between Pentacam and VX120 using clustered signed rank test; the interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated for each parameter between Pentacam and VX120; the Bland-Altman plot of each parameter was supplemented.

RESULTS

The anterior corneal curvature measured by VX120 was Ks: 44.00±1.78 D, KsAt: 89.45±22.18, Kf: 42.84±1.58 D, KfAt: 93.91±79.34; which measured by Pentacam was Ks: 43.80±1.82 D, KsAt: 91.17±21.40, Kf: 42.61±1.64 D, KfAt: 91.16±78.69. There was statistical difference between Pentacam and VX120 for anterior corneal curvature parameter (<0.001). The posterior corneal curvature measured by VX120 was Ks: -6.42±1.23 D, KsAt: 91.00±23.45, Kf: -5.85±1.24 D, KfAt: 95.93±79.11; which measured by Pentacam was Ks: -6.44±0.32 D, KsAt: 92.24±11.75, Kf: -6.01±1.05 D, KfAt: 74.43±80.64. There was statistical difference between Pentacam and VX120 for posterior corneal curvature parameters (<0.001). Anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured by Pentacam and VX120 was statistically different. Pentacam and VX120 achieved high consistency only on corneal anterior surface, including Ks and Kf. The ICCs were 0.96 (95%CI: 0.95, 0.97) and 0.95 (95%CI: 0.94, 0.97) respectively. For other corneal surface curvature parameters, all ICCs of between Pentacam and VX120 were below 0.87. Bland-Altman plots indicated of low consistency of corneal surface curvature parameters measured by Pentacam and VX120.

CONCLUSION

The corneal curvature parameters and anterior chamber depth measured by Pentacam and VX120 were statistically different. Data measured by Pentacam and VX120 is not suggested to replace each other, mixing data measured by Pentacam and VX120 together is not suggested either.

摘要

目的

探讨Pentacam和VX120测量的相同角膜曲率参数及前房深度是否具有良好的一致性以及能否相互替代。

方法

本研究纳入70例年龄在19至53岁之间患者的140只眼。所有眼睛均接受了全面的眼科检查,分别使用VX120系统(法国沙特尔Visionix-Luneau Technologies公司)和Pentacam(德国Oculus Optikgerate GmbH公司)进行眼前节分析。采用聚类符号秩检验对Pentacam和VX120的角膜曲率参数进行比较;计算Pentacam和VX120各参数的组内相关系数(ICC)及其95%置信区间(CI);补充各参数的Bland-Altman图。

结果

VX120测量的前角膜曲率为Ks:44.00±1.78 D,KsAt:89.45±22.18,Kf:42.84±1.58 D,KfAt:93.91±79.34;Pentacam测量的为Ks:43.80±1.82 D,KsAt:91.17±21.40,Kf:42.61±1.64 D,KfAt:91.16±78.69。Pentacam和VX120在前角膜曲率参数方面存在统计学差异(<0.001)。VX120测量的后角膜曲率为Ks:-6.42±1.23 D,KsAt:91.00±23.45,Kf:-5.85±1.24 D,KfAt:95.93±79.11;Pentacam测量的为Ks:-6.44±0.32 D,KsAt:92.24±11.75,Kf:-6.01±1.05 D,KfAt:74.43±80.64。Pentacam和VX120在后角膜曲率参数方面存在统计学差异(<0.001)。Pentacam和VX120测量的前房深度(ACD)存在统计学差异。Pentacam和VX120仅在角膜前表面(包括Ks和Kf)具有较高的一致性,ICC分别为0.96(95%CI:0.95,0.97)和0.95(95%CI:0.94,0.97)。对于其他角膜表面曲率参数,Pentacam和VX120之间的所有ICC均低于0.87。Bland-Altman图表明Pentacam和VX120测量的角膜表面曲率参数一致性较低。

结论

Pentacam和VX120测量的角膜曲率参数及前房深度存在统计学差异。不建议Pentacam和VX120的数据相互替代,也不建议将Pentacam和VX120测量的数据混合使用。