Suppr超能文献

在河南农村队列研究中,FFQ 的可重复性和有效性。

Reproducibility and validity of an FFQ in the Henan Rural Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan450001, People's Republic of China.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan450001, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2020 Jan;23(1):34-40. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019002416. Epub 2019 Sep 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of a thirteen-item FFQ regarding identification of dietary conditions in a rural population in China.

DESIGN

A reproducibility study repeated the first FFQ (FFQ1) approximately 4 weeks later (FFQ2). A validity study evaluated the mean of three consecutive 24 h diet recalls as the reference measure.

SETTING

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Residents of a rural area in Henan Province, which is located in the central region of China.

RESULTS

A total of 295 individuals participated in the reproducibility study. In addition, 123 people agreed to participate in the validity study. Spearman's correlation coefficients between the two FFQ ranged from 0·06 (vegetables) to 0·58 (eggs). Spearman's correlation coefficients between the two methods of collection ranged from 0·01 for cereal to 0·49 for staple foods. The mean of the intraclass correlation coefficients of the two FFQ (FFQ1 v. FFQ2) was 0·19. Bland-Altman analysis indicated good agreement for most food groups across the range of intake for the two studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated that our FFQ design could be used as a representative tool to conduct a dietary evaluation of a rural population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估一份包含十三个项目的 FFQ 在中国农村人群中识别饮食状况的有效性和可重复性。

设计

一项重复性研究在大约四周后重复第一次 FFQ(FFQ1)(FFQ2)。一项有效性研究将连续三天的 24 小时饮食回忆的平均值作为参考测量值进行评估。

地点

横断面研究。

参与者

居住在中国中部河南省农村地区的居民。

结果

共有 295 人参加了重复性研究。此外,有 123 人同意参加有效性研究。两个 FFQ 之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数范围从 0.06(蔬菜)到 0.58(鸡蛋)。两种采集方法之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数范围从谷物的 0.01 到主食的 0.49。两个 FFQ(FFQ1 v. FFQ2)的组内相关系数的平均值为 0.19。Bland-Altman 分析表明,两种研究的摄入量范围内,大多数食物组之间具有良好的一致性。

结论

该研究表明,我们的 FFQ 设计可以作为对农村人群进行饮食评估的代表性工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验