Lynch Brian A, Kaufman Tara K, Rajjo Tamim I, Mohammed K, Kumar Seema, Murad M Hassan, Gentile Natalie E, Koepp Gabriel A, McCrady-Spitzer Shelly K, Levine James A
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2150132719874252. doi: 10.1177/2150132719874252.
This systematic review evaluated the accuracy of triaxial and omnidirectional accelerometers for measuring physical activity and sedentary behavior in children. Systematic review of the literature. We comprehensively searched several databases for studies published from January 1996 through June 2018 that reported diagnostic accuracy measures in children and adolescents (age 3-18 years) and compared accelerometers with energy expenditure using indirect calorimetry. We included 11 studies that enrolled 570 participants. All studies used indirect calorimetry as the reference standard. Across the studies, median sensitivity ranged from 46% to 96% and median specificity ranged from 71% to 96%. Median area under the curve ranged from 69% to 98%. Accuracy measures were greatest when detecting sedentary behavior and lowest when detecting light physical activity. Accuracy was higher when the accelerometer was placed on the hip compared with the wrist. The current evidence suggests that triaxial and omnidirectional accelerometers are accurate in measuring sedentary behavior and physical activity levels in children.
本系统评价评估了三轴和全向加速度计在测量儿童身体活动和久坐行为方面的准确性。文献系统评价。我们全面检索了多个数据库,以查找1996年1月至2018年6月发表的研究,这些研究报告了儿童和青少年(3至18岁)的诊断准确性指标,并使用间接量热法将加速度计与能量消耗进行了比较。我们纳入了11项研究,共570名参与者。所有研究均使用间接量热法作为参考标准。在各项研究中,中位灵敏度范围为46%至96%,中位特异性范围为71%至96%。曲线下面积中位数范围为69%至98%。检测久坐行为时准确性指标最高,检测轻度身体活动时最低。与手腕相比,将加速度计放置在髋部时准确性更高。目前的证据表明,三轴和全向加速度计在测量儿童久坐行为和身体活动水平方面是准确的。