University of Washington, 119a Guthrie Hall, Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1 Bowdoin Square, Room 656, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jan;29(1):127-139. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02298-3. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
Humans are fundamentally social beings, and the relationships we form with others are crucial for our well-being. Research across a variety of domains has established the association between a variety of interpersonal factors and health outcomes, including quality-of-life. However, there is a need for a more integrative, holistic analysis of these variables and how they relate to one another.
Undergraduate students (n = 1456) from four universities across the United States completed self-report measures of their quality-of-life and a variety of interpersonal factors identified as important predictors across the literature. We examined zero-order correlations between these measures and quality-of-life, estimated a path model to look at unique variance accounted for by each, and finally used network analysis to examine the network of direct and indirect associations among these variables and quality-of-life.
Loneliness had the strongest association with quality-of-life across all analyses. When examining the unique association between quality-of-life and each interpersonal variable, six remained statistically significant: loneliness, social support, social connectedness, emotional intelligence, intimacy with one's romantic partner, and empathic concern. These results were supported by the network model, which found direct associations between quality-of-life and these six variables as well as indirect associations with all other interpersonal variables in the model.
Results from this research suggest that interpersonal factors in general, and loneliness in particular, are strongly associated with quality-of-life. Future research is needed to establish the direction of these effects and examine for whom these findings are generalizable.
人类本质上是社会性的动物,我们与他人建立的关系对我们的幸福至关重要。跨多个领域的研究已经确定了各种人际关系因素与健康结果(包括生活质量)之间的关联。然而,需要更综合、更全面的分析这些变量以及它们之间的相互关系。
来自美国四所大学的本科生(n=1456)完成了自我报告的生活质量和多种人际关系因素的测量,这些因素被认为是文献中重要的预测因素。我们检查了这些测量指标与生活质量之间的零阶相关性,估计了一个路径模型来观察每个因素所解释的独特方差,最后使用网络分析来检查这些变量与生活质量之间的直接和间接关联网络。
在所有分析中,孤独感与生活质量的关联最强。当检查生活质量与每个人际关系变量之间的独特关联时,有六个变量仍然具有统计学意义:孤独感、社会支持、社交联系、情绪智力、与浪漫伴侣的亲密关系和共情关怀。网络模型支持了这些结果,该模型发现生活质量与这六个变量之间存在直接关联,以及与模型中所有其他人际关系变量之间的间接关联。
这项研究的结果表明,人际关系因素,特别是孤独感,与生活质量密切相关。需要进一步的研究来确定这些影响的方向,并研究这些发现对谁具有普遍性。