Salcedo Juan C, Jiménez-Leal William
Laboratorio de Cognición, Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 3;10:1883. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01883. eCollection 2019.
In this paper, we investigated how justifications for price increases are associated with risky decision making and emotional responses. Across two studies with paired lottery choices and sequential decisions, we found that participants presented with a justification for price increases based on increasing demand decided to invest in a comparatively riskier asset more often than participants presented with a justification for price increases based on increasing tax or those presented with no justification at all. We also found that participants presented with justifications for price increases based on increasing demand also reported higher arousal and displayed higher galvanic skin response than people in the other two justification conditions. Together, these studies provide evidence that only the increasing demand condition underlying a price increase of a risky asset can influence the decision to buy and suggests that emotional activation has a crucial role in such a decision process.
在本文中,我们研究了价格上涨的理由如何与风险决策和情绪反应相关联。在两项涉及配对彩票选择和顺序决策的研究中,我们发现,与那些基于税收增加或根本没有理由而给出价格上涨理由的参与者相比,面对基于需求增加而给出价格上涨理由的参与者更频繁地决定投资于风险相对更高的资产。我们还发现,与处于其他两种理由条件下的人相比,面对基于需求增加而给出价格上涨理由的参与者也报告了更高的唤醒水平,并表现出更高的皮肤电反应。总之,这些研究提供了证据,表明只有风险资产价格上涨背后的需求增加条件才能影响购买决策,并表明情绪激活在这一决策过程中起着关键作用。