Perrakis Aristotelis, Vassos Nikolaos, Weber Klaus, Matzel Klaus E, Papadopoulos Konstantinos, Koukis Georgios, Perrakis Evangelos, Croner Roland S, Hohenberger Werner
Department of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Arch Med Sci. 2019 Sep;15(5):1269-1277. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2018.80040. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is generally accepted as state of the art in colon cancer surgery. However, the long-term impact of CME has not been systematically examined. Therefore cohort studies might be a possible way to clarify any differences between conventional resections and CME. Following bilateral cooperation between the Department of Surgery/University Hospital of Erlangen and the 1 Surgical Department of the General Hospital of Nikaia/Piraeus, including teaching activities for introduction of CME, a cohort study was performed, considering surgical quality criteria and clinical outcome.
All patients with colon carcinomas (CME group, = 31) referred to the 1 Surgical Department of General Hospital, Nikaia/Piraeus, Greece for surgery from January 2012 to December 2013 were prospectively analyzed and compared with patients who underwent conventional surgery for colon cancer between January 2008 and December 2011 (non-CME group, = 35). Patients' follow-up was at least 48 months.
There were significantly better results in terms of lymph node yield (CME group: 29.6 vs. non-CME group: 17.85; < 0.001) and lymph node ratio (LNR) (CME group: 0.12 vs. non-CME group: 0.24; < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival in favor of the CME group (CME group: = 0 vs. non-CME group: = 5) without any increase in surgical morbidity (CME group: = 6 vs. non-CME group: = 11; = 0.10).
Complete mesocolic excision appears to offer a superior oncological result without any increase of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, CME represents a surgical technique which can be established in a surgical department after previous teaching without increasing the postoperative complication rate.
完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)被普遍认为是结肠癌手术的先进技术。然而,CME的长期影响尚未得到系统研究。因此,队列研究可能是阐明传统切除术与CME之间差异的一种可行方法。在埃尔朗根大学医院外科与比雷埃夫斯尼凯亚总医院第一外科开展双边合作(包括引入CME的教学活动)之后,进行了一项考虑手术质量标准和临床结果的队列研究。
前瞻性分析了2012年1月至2013年12月转诊至希腊比雷埃夫斯尼凯亚总医院第一外科接受手术的所有结肠癌患者(CME组,n = 31),并与2008年1月至2011年12月期间接受结肠癌传统手术的患者(非CME组,n = 35)进行比较。患者的随访时间至少为48个月。
在淋巴结获取数量(CME组:29.6 vs.非CME组:17.85;P < 0.001)、淋巴结比率(LNR)(CME组:0.12 vs.非CME组:0.24;P < 0.001)以及无复发生存方面,CME组的结果明显更好(CME组:n = 0 vs.非CME组:n = 5),且手术并发症并未增加(CME组:n = 6 vs.非CME组:n = 11;P = 0.10)。
完整结肠系膜切除术似乎能提供更优的肿瘤学结果,且不会增加术后发病率和死亡率。此外,CME是一种在经过前期教学后可在外科科室开展且不增加术后并发症发生率的手术技术。