Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Adult and Child Consortium of Outcome Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 13;14(11):e0216971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216971. eCollection 2019.
INTRODUCTION: There has been an increasing focus on disseminating research findings, but less about practices specific to disseminating and engaging non-researchers. The present project sought to describe dissemination practices and engagement of stakeholders among dissemination & implementation (D&I) scientists. METHODS: Methods to disseminate to and engage non-research stakeholders were assessed using an online survey sent to a broad, diverse sample of D&I scientists. RESULTS: Surveys were received from 210 participants. The majority of respondents were from university or research settings in the United States. (69%) or Canada (13%), representing a mix of clinical (28%) and community settings (34%). 26% had received formal training in D&I. Respondents indicated routinely engaging in a variety of dissemination-related activities, with academic journal publications (88%), conference presentations (86%), and reports to funders (74%) being the most frequent. Journal publication was identified as the most impactful on respondents' careers (94%), but face-to-face meetings with stakeholders were rated as most impactful on practice or policy (40%). Stakeholder involvement in research was common, with clinical and community-based researchers engaging stakeholder groups in broadly similar ways, but with critical differences noted between researchers with greater seniority, those with more D&I training, those based in the United States vs. Canada, and those in community vs. clinical research settings. CONCLUSIONS: There have been increases in stakeholder engagement, but few other practices since the 2012 survey, and some differences across subgroups. Methods to engage different stakeholders deserve more in-depth investigation. D&I researchers report substantial misalignment of incentives and behaviors related to dissemination to non-research audiences.
简介:越来越关注研究成果的传播,但对于专门针对传播和吸引非研究人员的实践却关注较少。本项目旨在描述传播和实施(D&I)科学家的传播实践和利益相关者的参与情况。
方法:通过向广泛而多样化的 D&I 科学家样本发送在线调查,评估了向非研究利益相关者传播和吸引他们的方法。
结果:共收到 210 名参与者的调查。大多数受访者来自美国或加拿大的大学或研究机构(69%)或加拿大(13%),代表了临床(28%)和社区环境(34%)的混合体。26%的人接受过 D&I 的正规培训。受访者表示经常参与各种与传播相关的活动,其中学术期刊发表(88%)、会议演讲(86%)和向资助者报告(74%)最为频繁。期刊发表被认为对受访者的职业发展最具影响力(94%),但与利益相关者的面对面会议被认为对实践或政策最具影响力(40%)。利益相关者参与研究很常见,临床和社区研究人员以大致相似的方式吸引利益相关者群体,但资深研究人员、接受过更多 D&I 培训的研究人员、来自美国和加拿大的研究人员以及社区和临床研究环境中的研究人员之间存在显著差异。
结论:自 2012 年调查以来,利益相关者的参与度有所增加,但其他实践活动却很少,而且在不同亚组之间存在一些差异。吸引不同利益相关者的方法值得更深入的研究。D&I 研究人员报告称,与向非研究受众传播相关的激励措施和行为存在很大的不一致。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020-12-7
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018-11-12
J Gen Intern Med. 2018-12-18
Clin Trials. 2016-12
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018-11
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025-5-31
Support Care Cancer. 2025-5-15
J Med Internet Res. 2025-1-13
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2025-1-13
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018
Implement Sci. 2017-8-16
Am J Prev Med. 2017-3
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016-4
Public Health Rep. 2014
Am J Public Health. 2013-7-18
Implement Sci. 2013-1-24