文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

传播与实施科学家的传播和利益相关者参与实践:一项在线调查的结果。

Dissemination and stakeholder engagement practices among dissemination & implementation scientists: Results from an online survey.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America.

Adult and Child Consortium of Outcome Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Nov 13;14(11):e0216971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216971. eCollection 2019.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0216971
PMID:31721784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6853327/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There has been an increasing focus on disseminating research findings, but less about practices specific to disseminating and engaging non-researchers. The present project sought to describe dissemination practices and engagement of stakeholders among dissemination & implementation (D&I) scientists. METHODS: Methods to disseminate to and engage non-research stakeholders were assessed using an online survey sent to a broad, diverse sample of D&I scientists. RESULTS: Surveys were received from 210 participants. The majority of respondents were from university or research settings in the United States. (69%) or Canada (13%), representing a mix of clinical (28%) and community settings (34%). 26% had received formal training in D&I. Respondents indicated routinely engaging in a variety of dissemination-related activities, with academic journal publications (88%), conference presentations (86%), and reports to funders (74%) being the most frequent. Journal publication was identified as the most impactful on respondents' careers (94%), but face-to-face meetings with stakeholders were rated as most impactful on practice or policy (40%). Stakeholder involvement in research was common, with clinical and community-based researchers engaging stakeholder groups in broadly similar ways, but with critical differences noted between researchers with greater seniority, those with more D&I training, those based in the United States vs. Canada, and those in community vs. clinical research settings. CONCLUSIONS: There have been increases in stakeholder engagement, but few other practices since the 2012 survey, and some differences across subgroups. Methods to engage different stakeholders deserve more in-depth investigation. D&I researchers report substantial misalignment of incentives and behaviors related to dissemination to non-research audiences.

摘要

简介:越来越关注研究成果的传播,但对于专门针对传播和吸引非研究人员的实践却关注较少。本项目旨在描述传播和实施(D&I)科学家的传播实践和利益相关者的参与情况。

方法:通过向广泛而多样化的 D&I 科学家样本发送在线调查,评估了向非研究利益相关者传播和吸引他们的方法。

结果:共收到 210 名参与者的调查。大多数受访者来自美国或加拿大的大学或研究机构(69%)或加拿大(13%),代表了临床(28%)和社区环境(34%)的混合体。26%的人接受过 D&I 的正规培训。受访者表示经常参与各种与传播相关的活动,其中学术期刊发表(88%)、会议演讲(86%)和向资助者报告(74%)最为频繁。期刊发表被认为对受访者的职业发展最具影响力(94%),但与利益相关者的面对面会议被认为对实践或政策最具影响力(40%)。利益相关者参与研究很常见,临床和社区研究人员以大致相似的方式吸引利益相关者群体,但资深研究人员、接受过更多 D&I 培训的研究人员、来自美国和加拿大的研究人员以及社区和临床研究环境中的研究人员之间存在显著差异。

结论:自 2012 年调查以来,利益相关者的参与度有所增加,但其他实践活动却很少,而且在不同亚组之间存在一些差异。吸引不同利益相关者的方法值得更深入的研究。D&I 研究人员报告称,与向非研究受众传播相关的激励措施和行为存在很大的不一致。

相似文献

[1]
Dissemination and stakeholder engagement practices among dissemination & implementation scientists: Results from an online survey.

PLoS One. 2019-11-13

[2]
Understanding the Gap: A Cross-Sectional Survey of ELSI Scholars' Dissemination Practices and Translation Goals.

AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024

[3]
Perspectives of scientists on disseminating research findings to non-research audiences.

J Clin Transl Sci. 2020-12-7

[4]
Application of the i-PARIHS framework for enhancing understanding of interactive dissemination to achieve wide-scale improvement in Indigenous primary healthcare.

Health Res Policy Syst. 2018-11-29

[5]
Network Engagement in Action: Stakeholder Engagement Activities to Enhance Patient-centeredness of Research.

Med Care. 2020-6

[6]
Evaluating the impact of a network of research partnerships: a longitudinal multiple case study protocol.

Health Res Policy Syst. 2018-11-12

[7]
Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research.

J Gen Intern Med. 2018-12-18

[8]
Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.

Clin Trials. 2016-12

[9]
Stakeholder engagement opportunities in systematic reviews: knowledge transfer for policy and practice.

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008

[10]
Brief Report: A Survey of Autism Research Priorities Across a Diverse Community of Stakeholders.

J Autism Dev Disord. 2018-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Leveraging research steering committees for stakeholder engagement: a multifaceted strategy in Brazilian implementation projects.

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025-5-31

[2]
Dissemination planning in exercise oncology trials-a systematic review of trial protocols.

Support Care Cancer. 2025-5-15

[3]
Demonstrating Feasibility of Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS)-Guided Inpatient Transthoracic Echo Triage Decision Pathway.

POCUS J. 2025-4-15

[4]
Advancing the impact of research through a dissemination-focused special interest group.

BMJ Open. 2025-4-27

[5]
Improving cancer prevention and control through implementing academic-local public health department partnerships - protocol for a cluster-randomized implementation trial using a positive deviance approach.

Implement Sci Commun. 2025-2-24

[6]
Jargon and Readability in Plain Language Summaries of Health Research: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-1-13

[7]
Supporting teams with designing for dissemination and sustainability: the design, development, and usability of a digital interactive platform.

Implement Sci. 2024-12-31

[8]
Incorporating Systems-Level Stakeholder Perspectives into the Design of Mobile Integrated Health Programs.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2025-1-13

[9]
Community-based psychosocial support interventions to reduce stigma and improve mental health of people with infectious diseases: a scoping review.

Infect Dis Poverty. 2024-12-3

[10]
The Acceptability, Safety and Impact of a Play Co-Developed With Public Contributors as a Format for Disseminating Research on a Sensitive Subject.

Health Expect. 2024-12

本文引用的文献

[1]
Training scholars in dissemination and implementation research for cancer prevention and control: a mentored approach.

Implement Sci. 2018-1-22

[2]
Getting the Word Out: New Approaches for Disseminating Public Health Science.

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018

[3]
Building capacity for dissemination and implementation research: one university's experience.

Implement Sci. 2017-8-16

[4]
Learning About and Using Research Evidence Among Public Health Practitioners.

Am J Prev Med. 2017-3

[5]
Authentic Engagement Of Patients And Communities Can Transform Research, Practice, And Policy.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2016-4

[6]
Mapping training needs for dissemination and implementation research: lessons from a synthesis of existing D&I research training programs.

Transl Behav Med. 2017-9

[7]
A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project.

Implement Sci. 2015-2-12

[8]
What predicts dissemination efforts among public health researchers in the United States?

Public Health Rep. 2014

[9]
Designing for dissemination among public health researchers: findings from a national survey in the United States.

Am J Public Health. 2013-7-18

[10]
The U.S. training institute for dissemination and implementation research in health.

Implement Sci. 2013-1-24

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索