Department of Biological Sciences, University of Embu, P.O BOX 6, Embu, 60100, Kenya.
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O BOX 30709, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Ecohealth. 2019 Dec;16(4):712-725. doi: 10.1007/s10393-019-01453-z. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the seroprevalence of Brucella spp. and Leptospira spp. and risk factors of exposure in cattle in three zones with varying land use types and wildlife-livestock interactions. Five villages were selected purposively; two in areas with intensive livestock-wildlife interactions (zone 1), another two in areas with moderate livestock-wildlife interactions (zone 2) and one in areas where wildlife-livestock interactions are rarer (zone 3). Sera samples were collected from 1170 cattle belonging to 390 herds in all the zones and tested for antibodies against Brucella abortus and Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo using ELISA kits. Data on putative risk factors for seropositivity of these pathogens in cattle were collected using a questionnaire. The overall apparent animal-level seroprevalence of brucellosis and leptospirosis was, respectively, 36.9% (95% CI 34.1-39.8) and 23.5% (95% CI 21.1-26.0). Brucella spp. seroprevalence was higher in zone 1 than in zones 2 and 3 (χ = 25.1, df = 2, P < 0.001). Zones 1 and 2 had significantly higher Leptospira spp. seroprevalence than zone 3 (χ = 7.0, df = 2, P = 0.029). Results of multivariable analyses identified animal sex (female) and zones (high interface area) as significant predictors (P < 0.05) of animal-level seropositivity of Brucella spp. For Leptospira spp., important predictors of animal-level seropositivity were animal sex (female), zones (moderate interface area) and herds utilizing a communal grazing reserve. The seroprevalences of Brucella spp. and Leptospira spp. in cattle were higher in areas with moderate to high wildlife-livestock interactions than those with rare interactions.
本研究采用横断面调查方法,旨在确定在具有不同土地利用类型和野生动物-家畜相互作用的三个区域中,牛布鲁氏菌病和钩端螺旋体病的血清流行率及其暴露的危险因素。我们选择了五个村庄,两个位于野生动物-家畜相互作用强烈的地区(1 区),两个位于野生动物-家畜相互作用中度的地区(2 区),一个位于野生动物-家畜相互作用较少的地区(3 区)。从所有三个区域的 390 个牛群中采集了 1170 份血清样本,并使用 ELISA 试剂盒检测针对布鲁氏菌 abortus 和钩端螺旋体 interrogans serovar hardjo 的抗体。使用问卷收集了这些病原体在牛群中血清阳性的潜在危险因素数据。牛布鲁氏菌病和钩端螺旋体病的总表观动物水平血清流行率分别为 36.9%(95%CI 34.1-39.8)和 23.5%(95%CI 21.1-26.0)。1 区的布鲁氏菌病血清流行率高于 2 区和 3 区(χ²=25.1,df=2,P<0.001)。1 区和 2 区的钩端螺旋体病血清流行率明显高于 3 区(χ²=7.0,df=2,P=0.029)。多变量分析结果表明,动物性别(雌性)和区域(高界面面积)是动物布鲁氏菌病血清阳性的显著预测因素(P<0.05)。对于钩端螺旋体病,动物性别(雌性)、区域(中度界面面积)和利用公共放牧保护区的畜群是动物血清阳性的重要预测因素。在野生动物-家畜相互作用中度至强烈的地区,牛布鲁氏菌病和钩端螺旋体病的血清流行率高于野生动物-家畜相互作用较少的地区。