TSW XP Lab, Via Terraglio, Treviso, Italy.
Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 22;14(11):e0225592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225592. eCollection 2019.
Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) allows contactless monitoring of human cardiac activity through a video camera. In this study, we assessed the accuracy and precision for heart rate measurements of the only consumer product available on the market, namely the FacereaderTM rPPG by Noldus, with respect to a gold standard electrocardiograph. Twenty-four healthy participants were asked to sit in front of a computer screen and alternate two periods of rest with two stress tests (i.e. Go/No-Go task), while their heart rate was simultaneously acquired for 20 minutes using the ECG criterion measure and the FacereaderTM rPPG. Results show that the FacereaderTM rPPG tends to overestimate lower heart rates and underestimate higher heart rates compared to the ECG. The Facereader™ rPPG revealed a mean bias of 9.8 bpm, the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) ranged from almost -30 up to +50 bpm. These results suggest that whilst the rPPG FacereaderTM technology has potential for contactless heart rate monitoring, its predictions are inaccurate for higher heart rates, with unacceptable precision across the entire range, rendering its estimates unreliable for monitoring individuals.
远程光电容积脉搏波描记术(rPPG)可通过摄像机实现对人体心脏活动的非接触式监测。在本研究中,我们评估了市面上唯一一款可用的消费类产品——Noldus 的 FacereaderTM rPPG 进行心率测量的准确性和精密度,将其与心电图金标准进行对比。24 名健康参与者被要求坐在电脑屏幕前,在两次休息期间交替进行两次应激测试(即 Go/No-Go 任务),同时使用 ECG 标准测量和 FacereaderTM rPPG 对他们的心率进行 20 分钟的同步采集。结果表明,与 ECG 相比,FacereaderTM rPPG 往往会高估较低的心率,低估较高的心率。Facereader™ rPPG 显示平均偏差为 9.8 bpm,95%的一致性界限(LoA)范围从几乎 -30 到 +50 bpm。这些结果表明,尽管 rPPG FacereaderTM 技术具有非接触式心率监测的潜力,但它对较高心率的预测不准确,在整个范围内精度不高,使得其估计值不可靠,无法用于监测个体。