Clinical Psychology Program, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel.
Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel.
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Feb;26(1):13-25. doi: 10.1007/s40519-019-00824-3. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
Homosexuality is a clear risk factor for disordered eating in men; however, for women, research has yielded contradictory results. We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the association between sexual orientation and disordered eating in women.
PRISMA guidelines were used. Studies comparing disordered eating between lesbians and heterosexual women were identified using PsycNet database and Google Scholar. Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Overall disordered eating, restricting, binging and purging were examined for heterosexual, lesbian, bisexual and 'mostly heterosexual' women.
Whereas there was no significant difference in overall disordered eating between lesbians and heterosexual women, lesbians reported restricting less and binging more than heterosexual women. Bisexual women were more likely than lesbian women to restrict food intake and purge, and more likely than heterosexual women to have overall disordered eating and restrict food intake. "Mostly heterosexual" women were more likely than heterosexual women to restrict food intake, binge and purge.
Women of different sexual orientations show distinct patterns of disordered eating. Bisexual and "mostly heterosexual" women appear to be particularly at risk. Stress resulting from binegativity and rigid views of sexuality in a dichotomous society, rather than sexual orientation itself, may be associated with disordered eating in women. Findings should be viewed with caution because there were few studies with bisexual and "mostly heterosexual" women. This study elucidates the nature of the association between disordered eating and sexual orientation. Findings provide a possible explanation for previous inconsistencies, since opposing trends for different behaviors cancel each other out.
Level I, systematic review and meta-analysis.
同性恋是男性饮食失调的一个明显危险因素;然而,对于女性,研究结果却相互矛盾。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以检验女性性取向与饮食失调之间的关联。
使用 PRISMA 指南。使用 PsycNet 数据库和 Google Scholar 确定了比较女同性恋者和异性恋女性饮食失调的研究。符合纳入标准的有 21 项研究。对异性恋、女同性恋、双性恋和“主要异性恋”女性的总体饮食失调、限制、暴食和催吐进行了检查。
尽管女同性恋者和异性恋女性在总体饮食失调方面没有显著差异,但女同性恋者报告的限制饮食较少,暴食较多。双性恋女性比女同性恋者更有可能限制食物摄入和催吐,也比异性恋女性更有可能出现总体饮食失调和限制食物摄入。“主要异性恋”女性比异性恋女性更有可能限制食物摄入、暴食和催吐。
不同性取向的女性表现出不同的饮食失调模式。双性恋和“主要异性恋”女性似乎风险特别高。来自于双性恋和二元社会中对性的刻板观念的双性恋厌恶和僵化观点的压力,而不是性取向本身,可能与女性的饮食失调有关。由于双性恋和“主要异性恋”女性的研究较少,因此应谨慎看待这些发现。本研究阐明了饮食失调与性取向之间关联的本质。研究结果为之前的不一致提供了一种可能的解释,因为不同行为的相反趋势相互抵消。
一级,系统评价和荟萃分析。