• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酒精税相关观点。

Perspectives on Alcohol Taxation.

作者信息

Kenkel Donald, Manning Willard

机构信息

Donald Kenkel, Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Consumer Economics and Housing, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. Willard Manning, Ph.D., is a professor in the Institute for Health Services Research, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

Alcohol Health Res World. 1996;20(4):230-238.

PMID:31798166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6876520/
Abstract

The issue of alcohol taxation can be viewed from several angles: public health, revenue generation, economic efficiency, fairness, and effects on employment. Conclusions about when an alcohol tax increase is appropriate or effective-or by how much a tax should be increased-differ widely, however, depending on which of these perspectives is taken. Policymakers trying to find a balance among the different perspectives must weigh the multiple trade-offs involved when a tax increase is proposed. Considerations include how different drinking populations respond to tax-induced higher alcohol prices, the equity of a tax for all members of society, and the effects of displacement for workers in alcohol-related industries.

摘要

酒精税问题可以从多个角度来看待

公共卫生、税收创收、经济效率、公平性以及对就业的影响。然而,关于何时提高酒精税是合适的或有效的——或者应该提高多少税收——结论差异很大,这取决于所采用的这些观点中的哪一个。试图在不同观点之间找到平衡的政策制定者在提议提高税收时必须权衡其中涉及的多重权衡。需要考虑的因素包括不同饮酒人群如何应对税收导致的更高酒精价格、税收对社会所有成员的公平性,以及对酒精相关行业工人的替代效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255c/6876520/3cad4a9f0c78/arhw-20-4-230f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255c/6876520/94e99837861b/arhw-20-4-230f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255c/6876520/cef37ec15780/arhw-20-4-230f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255c/6876520/3cad4a9f0c78/arhw-20-4-230f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255c/6876520/94e99837861b/arhw-20-4-230f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255c/6876520/cef37ec15780/arhw-20-4-230f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255c/6876520/3cad4a9f0c78/arhw-20-4-230f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Perspectives on Alcohol Taxation.酒精税相关观点。
Alcohol Health Res World. 1996;20(4):230-238.
2
Estimated impacts of alternative Australian alcohol taxation structures on consumption, public health and government revenues.澳大利亚不同酒类税收结构对酒类消费、公共健康和政府税收的影响评估。
Med J Aust. 2013 Nov 4;199(9):619-22. doi: 10.5694/mja13.10605.
3
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
4
The efficiency of a volumetric alcohol tax in Australia.澳大利亚容积酒精税的效率。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012 Jan 1;10(1):37-49. doi: 10.2165/11594850-000000000-00000.
5
Cost-effectiveness of volumetric alcohol taxation in Australia.澳大利亚容积酒精税的成本效益。
Med J Aust. 2010 Apr 19;192(8):439-43. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03581.x.
6
Alcohol taxes' contribution to prices in high and middle-income countries: Data from the International Alcohol Control Study.高收入和中等收入国家酒类税收对价格的贡献:国际酒精控制研究的数据。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Aug;37 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):S27-S35. doi: 10.1111/dar.12638. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
7
8
The recent and projected public health and economic benefits of cigarette taxation in Greece.希腊香烟税近期及预计的公共卫生和经济效益。
Tob Control. 2014 Sep;23(5):452-4. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050857. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
9
Effects of changes to the taxation of beer on alcohol consumption and government revenue in Australia.澳大利亚啤酒税收政策变化对酒精消费和政府收入的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Aug;70:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 May 1.
10
Are Alcohol Taxation and Pricing Policies Regressive? Product-Level Effects of a Specific Tax and a Minimum Unit Price for Alcohol.酒精税和定价政策是否具有累退性?酒精从量税和最低单位价格的产品层面影响。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2016 Jul;51(4):493-502. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agv133. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating environmental change strategies: challenges and solutions.评估环境变化策略:挑战与解决方案。
Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Mar;51(1-2):217-21. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9556-0.
2
Interventions for alcohol use and alcohol use disorders in youth.青少年饮酒及酒精使用障碍的干预措施。
Alcohol Res Health. 2004;28(3):163-74.
3
Environmental and contextual considerations.环境和背景因素。

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of price on alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems.价格对酒精消费及与酒精相关问题的影响。
Alcohol Res Health. 2002;26(1):22-34.
2
The demand for alcohol: the differential response to price.酒精需求:对价格的差异反应。
J Health Econ. 1995 Jun;14(2):123-48. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00042-3.
3
Alcohol beverage price spectra: opportunities for substitution.酒精饮料价格范围:替代机会。
Alcohol Res Health. 2004;28(3):155-62.
4
Economic analysis aids alcohol research.经济分析有助于酒精研究。
Alcohol Res Health. 2000;24(1):62-71.
5
Preventing impaired driving.防止酒驾。
Alcohol Res Health. 1999;23(1):31-9.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1993 Jun;17(3):675-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00818.x.
4
Effects of prices, civil and criminal sanctions, and law enforcement on alcohol-related mortality.价格、民事和刑事制裁以及执法对与酒精相关死亡率的影响。
J Stud Alcohol. 1994 Jul;55(4):454-65. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1994.55.454.
5
Patterns of self-reported drinking and driving in Michigan.密歇根州自我报告的酒后驾车模式。
Am J Prev Med. 1987 Sep-Oct;3(5):271-5.
6
The taxes of sin. Do smokers and drinkers pay their way?罪恶的代价。吸烟者和饮酒者付出了代价吗?
JAMA. 1989 Mar 17;261(11):1604-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.261.11.1604.