Parnell Laura K S, Volk Susan W
Precision Consulting, Missouri City, Texas.
Department of Clinical Studies and Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2019 Dec 1;8(12):692-702. doi: 10.1089/wound.2019.1098. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
Wound healing is a complex and dynamic series of events influenced by a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Problematic wounds, particularly chronic wounds and pathologic scars, remain clinically significant burdens. Modeling physiologic and aberrant wound repair processes using or models have contributed to (); however, the fidelity of each model used, particularly with respect to its species-specific limitations, must be taken into account for extrapolation to human patients. Twenty-five years of wound healing models published in (1993-2017) and (2012-2017) were collected and analyzed to determine trends in species utilization and models used. In 25 years, 1,521 original research articles utilizing one or more wound models were published (total of 1,665 models). Although 20 different species were used over the course of 25 years, 5 species were most commonly utilized: human, mouse, rat, pig, and rabbit. modeling was used most frequently, followed by , , and modeling of wound healing processes. A comparison of articles from 1993 to 1997 and 2013 to 2017 periods showed notable differences in model and species usage. Experiments utilizing mouse and human models increased, while the usage of pig models remained constant, rabbit and rat models declined in the more recent time period examined compared to the time period two decades before. This analysis shows notable changes in types of models and species used over time which may be attributed to new knowledge, techniques, technology, and/or reagents. Explorations into mechanisms of limb regeneration and wound healing of noncutaneous tissues have also contributed to a shift in modeling over time. Changes within the journals (, page expansion and increased rejection rates), research funding, and model expense may also influence the observed shifts.
伤口愈合是一系列复杂且动态的事件,受到多种内在和外在因素的影响。有问题的伤口,尤其是慢性伤口和病理性瘢痕,仍然是临床上的重大负担。使用细胞或动物模型模拟生理和异常的伤口修复过程有助于理解(相关机制);然而,为了将研究结果外推至人类患者,必须考虑所使用的每种模型的逼真度,尤其是其物种特异性局限性。收集并分析了在《伤口修复与再生》(1993 - 2017年)和《伤口护理进展》(2012 - 2017年)上发表的25年伤口愈合模型相关研究,以确定物种利用和所使用模型的趋势。在这25年中,发表了1521篇使用一种或多种伤口模型的原创研究文章(总共1665个模型)。尽管在这25年中使用了20种不同的物种,但最常用的5种物种是:人类、小鼠、大鼠、猪和兔子。细胞建模使用最为频繁,其次是伤口愈合过程的组织工程、动物和基因编辑建模。对1993年至1997年以及2013年至2017年期间文章的比较显示,在模型和物种使用方面存在显著差异。使用小鼠和人类模型的实验有所增加,而猪模型的使用保持不变,与二十年前的时间段相比,在最近研究的时间段内,兔子和大鼠模型的使用有所下降。该分析表明,随着时间的推移,所使用的模型类型和物种发生了显著变化,这可能归因于新知识、技术、工艺和/或试剂。对肢体再生机制和非皮肤组织伤口愈合的探索也导致了随着时间推移建模的转变。期刊内部的变化(如页面扩充和拒稿率增加)、研究资金和模型成本也可能影响所观察到的转变。