Gerson Sheri Mila, Koksvik Gitte H, Richards Naomi, Materstvedt Lars Johan, Clark David
School of Interdisciplinary Studies, Dumfries Campus, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
School of Interdisciplinary Studies, Dumfries Campus, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jun;59(6):1287-1303.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.361. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
A central approach of palliative care has been to provide holistic care for people who are dying, terminally ill, or facing life-limiting illnesses while neither hastening nor postponing death. Assisted dying laws allow eligible individuals to receive medically administered or self-administered medication from a health provider to end their life. The implementation of these laws in a growing number of jurisdictions therefore poses certain challenges for palliative care.
To analyze the research literature about the relationship of assisted dying with palliative care, in countries where it is lawful.
A five-stage scoping review process was adapted from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data sources searched through October 2018 were MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, SCOPUS, and ProQuest dissertations and theses, with additional material identified through hand searching. Research studies of any design were included, but editorials or opinion articles were excluded.
After reviewing 5778 references from searches, 105 were subject to full-text review. About 16 studies were included: from Belgium (n = 4), Canada (n = 1), Switzerland (n = 2), and the U.S. (n = 9). We found that the relationship between assisted dying and palliative care practices in these locations took varied and sometimes combined forms: supportive, neutral, coexisting, not mutually exclusive, integrated, synergistic, cooperative, collaborative, opposed, ambivalent, and conflicted.
The studies in this review cast only partial light on challenges faced by palliative care when assisted dying is legal. There is pressing need for more research on the involvement of palliative care in the developing practices of assisted dying, across a growing number of jurisdictions.
姑息治疗的核心方法是为濒死、身患绝症或面临生命有限疾病的人提供全面护理,既不加速也不推迟死亡。安乐死法律允许符合条件的个人从医疗服务提供者处获得药物治疗或自行服药以结束生命。因此,这些法律在越来越多的司法管辖区实施,给姑息治疗带来了一定挑战。
分析在安乐死合法的国家中,关于安乐死与姑息治疗关系的研究文献。
采用了乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的五阶段范围综述流程。截至2018年10月搜索的数据来源包括MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsychINFO、SCOPUS以及ProQuest学位论文数据库,并通过手工检索确定了其他资料。纳入了任何设计的研究,但排除了社论或评论文章。
在审查了搜索到的5778篇参考文献后,105篇进行了全文审查。纳入了约16项研究:来自比利时(n = 4)、加拿大(n = 1)、瑞士(n = 2)和美国(n = 9)。我们发现这些地区的安乐死与姑息治疗实践之间的关系呈现出多样的形式,有时是多种形式并存:支持、中立、共存、并非相互排斥、整合、协同、合作、协作、对立、矛盾和冲突。
本综述中的研究仅部分揭示了安乐死合法化时姑息治疗所面临的挑战。迫切需要更多关于姑息治疗在越来越多司法管辖区不断发展的安乐死实践中的参与情况的研究。