Clarke Joseph, Draper Steve
University of Glasgow, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Internet Interv. 2019 Nov 16;19:100293. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100293. eCollection 2020 Mar.
Despite a weak evidence base, daily use of mindfulness-based self-help smartphone applications (apps) is said to promote wellbeing. However, many do not use these apps in the way that app developers and mindfulness proponents recommend. We sought to determine whether the "Calm" app works, and whether it does so even when it is used intermittently.
Employing a mixed-methods design, we recruited a self-selected sample of 269 students from a Scottish university (81% female, 84% white, mean age 23.89) to engage with a seven-day introductory mindfulness course, delivered using Calm, currently one of the most popular, yet under-researched, apps.
Daily course engagement was associated with significant gains in wellbeing ( ≤.001, = 0.42), trait mindfulness ( ≤.001, = 0.50) and self-efficacy ( ≤.014, = 0.21). Intermittent course engagement was also associated with significant gains in wellbeing ( ≤.028, = 0.34), trait mindfulness ( ≤.010, = 0.47) and self-efficacy ( ≤.028, = 0.32). This study is therefore the first to demonstrate that the Calm app is associated with positive mental health outcomes. It also shows that regular use is not essential. A thematic analysis of qualitative data supported these quantitative findings. However it also revealed that some participants had negative experiences with the app.
Mindfulness-based self-help apps such as Calm have the potential to both enhance and diminish users' wellbeing. Intermittent mindfulness practice can lead to tangible benefits. Therefore, mindfulness proponents should not recommend daily practice, should increase awareness of the potential for negative outcomes, and resist the idea that mindfulness practice works for everyone. Developers of mindfulness apps ought to make specific features customisable in order to enhance their effectiveness.
尽管证据基础薄弱,但据说基于正念的自助智能手机应用程序(应用)的日常使用能促进幸福感。然而,许多人并未按照应用开发者和正念支持者推荐的方式使用这些应用。我们试图确定“Calm”应用是否有效,以及即使间歇性使用时是否也能如此。
采用混合方法设计,我们从一所苏格兰大学招募了269名学生的自我选择样本(81%为女性,84%为白人,平均年龄23.89岁),参与为期七天的正念入门课程,该课程使用Calm应用进行授课,Calm是目前最受欢迎但研究不足的应用之一。
每日课程参与与幸福感(p≤.001,d = 0.42)、特质正念(p≤.001,d = 0.50)和自我效能感(p≤.014,d = 0.21)的显著提升相关。间歇性课程参与也与幸福感(p≤.028,d = 0.34)、特质正念(p≤.010,d = 0.47)和自我效能感(p≤.028,d = 0.32)的显著提升相关。因此,本研究首次证明Calm应用与积极的心理健康结果相关。它还表明定期使用并非必不可少。对定性数据的主题分析支持了这些定量研究结果。然而,它也揭示了一些参与者对该应用有负面体验。
像Calm这样基于正念的自助应用既有可能增强也有可能降低用户的幸福感。间歇性正念练习可以带来切实的益处。因此,正念支持者不应推荐每日练习,应提高对负面结果可能性的认识,并抵制正念练习对每个人都有效的观点。正念应用开发者应该使特定功能可定制,以提高其有效性。