• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威驾驶员中精神活性物质使用与感觉寻求行为之间的关联。

Associations between psychoactive substance use and sensation seeking behavior among drivers in Norway.

机构信息

Department of Forensic Sciences, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 8;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8087-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-019-8087-0
PMID:31914964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6950984/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Drug use and risky driving is associated with sensation seeking. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between use of psychoactive substances and levels of the sensation seeking personality trait as measured with the Brief Sensation Seeking Scale 4 among drivers in Norway.

METHOD

A cross-sectional design was applied to estimate the association between psychoactive substance use and sensation seeking behavior. Drivers in normal traffic were included in two roadside surveys: one in the north (September 2014 - October 2015) and the other in the south-east of Norway (April 2016 - April 2017). Oral fluid was analyzed for alcohol and psychoactive drugs, and data on sex, age and time of participation were recorded. Participants filled in the Brief Sensation Seeking Scale 4 questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 8053 drivers were included, of which 32% were women and 62% were under 40 years. The prevalence of alcohol was 0.3%, stimulants 0.6%, tetrahydrocannabinol 1.4%, benzodiazepines and/or z-hypnotics 2.0% and polydrug use 0.6%. Associations were found between the use of tetrahydrocannabinol or benzodiazepines and/or z-hypnotics and a low score on the "thrill and adventure seeking" domain of the Brief Sensation Seeking Scale 4 (OR = 1.723, 95% C.I. = 1.001-2.966). Associations were also found between the use of stimulants and the highest scores on the "experience seeking" (OR = 2.085, 95% C.I. = 1.084-4.009) and "disinhibition" (OR = 4.791, 95% C.I. =1.748-13.135) domains of the Brief Sensation Seeking Scale 4. No associations were found between sensation seeking behavior and alcohol or polydrug use.

CONCLUSION

A high degree of sensation seeking was found among drivers who had used stimulating drugs, in contrast to drives who had used tetrahydrocannabinol and benzodiazepines and/or z-hypnotics who showed a low degree of sensation seeking. The combination of sensation seeking behavior and the use of stimulants might lead to increased risky behavior and thus traffic crashes.

摘要

背景/目的:药物使用和危险驾驶与寻求刺激有关。本研究的目的是调查挪威驾驶员中使用精神活性物质与感觉寻求人格特质之间的关系,该特质通过 4 项简短感觉寻求量表进行测量。

方法

采用横断面设计来估计使用精神活性物质与感觉寻求行为之间的关联。正常交通中的驾驶员被纳入两项路边调查中:一项在挪威北部(2014 年 9 月至 2015 年 10 月)进行,另一项在东南部(2016 年 4 月至 2017 年 4 月)进行。对口腔液进行了酒精和精神活性药物分析,并记录了性别、年龄和参与时间的数据。参与者填写了简短感觉寻求量表 4 问卷。

结果

共纳入 8053 名驾驶员,其中 32%为女性,62%年龄在 40 岁以下。酒精的流行率为 0.3%,兴奋剂为 0.6%,四氢大麻酚为 1.4%,苯二氮䓬类和/或 Z 类催眠药为 2.0%,多药使用为 0.6%。发现使用四氢大麻酚或苯二氮䓬类和/或 Z 类催眠药与简短感觉寻求量表 4 的“寻求刺激和冒险”域的低评分之间存在关联(OR=1.723,95%CI=1.001-2.966)。还发现使用兴奋剂与简短感觉寻求量表 4 的“体验寻求”(OR=2.085,95%CI=1.084-4.009)和“去抑制”(OR=4.791,95%CI=1.748-13.135)域的最高评分之间存在关联。感觉寻求行为与酒精或多药使用之间没有关联。

结论

与使用四氢大麻酚和苯二氮䓬类和/或 Z 类催眠药的驾驶员相比,使用兴奋剂的驾驶员表现出较高的感觉寻求程度,而使用兴奋剂的驾驶员则表现出较低的感觉寻求程度。感觉寻求行为与兴奋剂的使用相结合可能会导致危险行为增加,从而导致交通事故。

相似文献

1
Associations between psychoactive substance use and sensation seeking behavior among drivers in Norway.挪威驾驶员中精神活性物质使用与感觉寻求行为之间的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 8;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8087-0.
2
A comparison of alcohol and drug use by random motor vehicle drivers in Brazil and Norway.巴西和挪威随机抽取的机动车驾驶员酒精和药物使用情况的比较。
Int J Drug Policy. 2014 May;25(3):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.019. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
3
Roadside survey on alcohol and drug use among drivers in the Arctic county of Finnmark (Norway).挪威北极地区芬马克郡司机酒精和药物使用情况的路边调查。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Oct 3;18(7):681-687. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1283027. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
4
Alcohol, psychoactive substances and non-fatal road traffic accidents--a case-control study.酒精、精神活性物质与非致命性道路交通伤害——病例对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 3;12:734. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-734.
5
Association between alcohol and drug use and arrest for driving under the influence after crash involvement in a rural area of Norway: a case-control study.挪威农村地区涉及撞车事故后因酒驾被捕与饮酒和吸毒的关联:一项病例对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 3;9(1):e023563. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023563.
6
Roadside survey of alcohol and drug use among Norwegian drivers in 2016-2017: A follow-up of the 2008-2009 survey.2016 - 2017年挪威驾驶员酒精和药物使用情况的路边调查:2008 - 2009年调查的后续研究
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(6):555-562. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1478087. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
7
Which drugs are associated with highest risk for being arrested for driving under the influence? A case-control study.哪些药物与因酒后驾车被捕的风险最高相关?一项病例对照研究。
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Jul;240:21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.03.027. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
8
Trends in the use of psychoactive substances by truck drivers in São Paulo State, Brazil: A time-series cross sectional roadside survey (2009-2016).巴西圣保罗州卡车司机使用精神活性物质的趋势:一项时间序列横断面路边调查(2009 - 2016年)
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(2):122-127. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1552786. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
9
Driver-related risk factors of fatal road traffic crashes associated with alcohol or drug impairment.与酒精或药物损害相关的致命道路交通事故中驾驶员相关的风险因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Oct;131:191-199. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
10
The incidence of psychoactive substances and alcohol among impaired drivers in Denmark in 2015-2019.2015-2019 年丹麦受影响驾驶员中精神活性物质和酒精的发生率。
Forensic Sci Int. 2022 Apr;333:111207. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111207. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of self-assessed likelihood of future drug use among Korean adults: the role of health beliefs and personality traits.韩国成年人未来药物使用自我评估可能性的预测因素:健康信念和人格特质的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):1315. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22289-z.
2
Prevalence of alcohol-impaired driving: a systematic review with a gender-driven approach and meta-analysis of gender differences.酒精所致驾驶障碍的流行率:一种基于性别驱动的系统评价和性别差异荟萃分析。
Int J Legal Med. 2024 Nov;138(6):2523-2540. doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03291-3. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
3
Examining the Association between Psychopathic Traits and Fearlessness among Maximum-Security Incarcerated Male Adolescents.探究高度戒备监狱中被监禁男性青少年的精神病态特质与无畏之间的关联。
Children (Basel). 2024 Jan 3;11(1):65. doi: 10.3390/children11010065.
4
Sensation Seeking and Substance use in Chinese Adolescents: Longitudinal Trajectories and Prospective Within-person Associations.中国青少年的感觉寻求与物质使用:纵向轨迹和前瞻性个体内关联。
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Jul;52(7):1481-1499. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01748-z. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
5
Preschool Exposure to Online Games and Internet Gaming Disorder in Adolescents: A Cohort Study.学龄前儿童接触网络游戏与青少年网络成瘾障碍:一项队列研究。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Nov 23;9:760348. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.760348. eCollection 2021.
6
Mobile Phone Use "on the Road": A Self-Report Study on Young Drivers.在路上使用手机:一项关于年轻驾驶员的自我报告研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 16;12:620653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620653. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The association between sensation seeking and driving outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.感觉寻求与驾驶行为后果的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Feb;123:222-234. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
2
Roadside survey of alcohol and drug use among Norwegian drivers in 2016-2017: A follow-up of the 2008-2009 survey.2016 - 2017年挪威驾驶员酒精和药物使用情况的路边调查:2008 - 2009年调查的后续研究
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(6):555-562. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1478087. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
3
Roadside survey on alcohol and drug use among drivers in the Arctic county of Finnmark (Norway).挪威北极地区芬马克郡司机酒精和药物使用情况的路边调查。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Oct 3;18(7):681-687. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1283027. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
4
Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of d-amphetamine: Dimensions of impulsivity.右旋苯丙胺强化作用和主观效应的个体差异:冲动性维度
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016 Dec;24(6):436-446. doi: 10.1037/pha0000095.
5
Personality, Executive Control, and Neurobiological Characteristics Associated with Different Forms of Risky Driving.与不同形式的危险驾驶相关的人格、执行控制和神经生物学特征。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0150227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150227. eCollection 2016.
6
Traffic Offences: Planned or Habitual? Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour and habit strength to explain frequency and magnitude of speeding and driving under the influence of alcohol.交通违法行为:是蓄意的还是习惯性的?运用计划行为理论和习惯强度来解释超速驾驶和酒后驾车的频率及严重程度。
Br J Psychol. 2016 Feb;107(1):52-71. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12122. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
7
Norwegian roadside survey of alcohol and drug use by drivers (2008-2009).挪威 2008-2009 年的司机酒精和药物使用情况路边调查。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(5):443-52. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.728016.
8
Adolescent exposure to drink driving as a predictor of young adults' drink driving.青少年时期接触酒驾与年轻人酒驾的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Mar;51:185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.016. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
9
Personality, drug preference, drug use, and drug availability.人格、药物偏好、药物使用和药物可获得性。
J Drug Educ. 2011;41(1):45-63. doi: 10.2190/DE.41.1.c.
10
First-time DWI offenders are at risk of recidivating regardless of sanctions imposed.初次酒后驾车违法者无论受到何种制裁,都有再次犯罪的风险。
J Crim Justice. 2011 Mar;39(2):137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.01.001.