Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany; Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) Adiposity Diseases - Behavioral Medicine, Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Mar;130:109933. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109933. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
As sleep disorders have become a major concern in public health, there is strong need for a brief and sound measure for sleep problems. The purposes of the study were to 1) evaluate factor structure and measurement invariance, 2) validate the scale based on sociodemographic data and distress, and 3) provide norm values for the general population.
In a representative survey of the German population N = 2515 participants (14 to 95 years) filled in the 4-item Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS-4), sociodemographic questions and the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (anxiety, depression, somatic symptom load). The JSS-4 was analyzed by principal component analysis, confirmatory and multi-group confirmatory factor analyses. A multiple-indicator-multiple-cause model was tested to investigate the relationship of the JSS-4 to distress and sociodemographic variables.
The one-factor structure of JSS-4 was confirmed. Given the heterogeneity of facets of sleep problems captured in the four items, internal consistency of the JSS-4 was remarkably high. The JSS-4 was strictly invariant across both sexes, and partially strictly invariant across income groups and individuals living with or without a partner. With regard to the full age range, it showed partial scalar invariance.
Female sex, higher age, living without a partner, lower education, lower income and increased distress were associated with more sleep problems. Calculated normative data of sleep problems allow comparisons of JSS-4 scores stratified by sex and age.
由于睡眠障碍已成为公众健康的主要关注点,因此非常需要一种简短且合理的睡眠问题衡量标准。本研究的目的是:1)评估因素结构和测量不变性;2)根据社会人口统计学数据和痛苦验证量表;3)为普通人群提供正常数值。
在德国代表性人群调查中,共有 2515 名参与者(14 至 95 岁)填写了 4 项詹金斯睡眠量表(JSS-4)、社会人口学问题和简要症状清单-18(焦虑、抑郁、躯体症状负荷)。采用主成分分析、验证性和多组验证性因子分析对 JSS-4 进行分析。采用多指标-多原因模型来研究 JSS-4 与痛苦和社会人口学变量的关系。
JSS-4 的单因素结构得到了证实。考虑到四个项目中捕捉到的睡眠问题特征的异质性,JSS-4 的内部一致性非常高。JSS-4 在性别、收入群体和是否有伴侣方面具有严格不变性。在整个年龄范围内,它表现出部分标度不变性。
女性、年龄较大、没有伴侣、教育程度较低、收入较低和痛苦程度增加与更多的睡眠问题相关。计算出的睡眠问题正常数据允许按性别和年龄对 JSS-4 分数进行分层比较。