Arias Franchesca, Wiggins Margaret, Urman Richard D, Armstrong Rebecca, Pfeifer Kurt, Bader Angela M, Libon David J, Chopra Anita, Price Catherine C
Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence (PRICE), 101 S. Newell Drive, PO Box 100165, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States of America; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, The University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32603, United States of America; Perioperative Cognitive Anesthesia Network (PeCAN), UF Health Shands Hospital, 1600 SW Archer Road Suite 1111, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States of America; Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, PO Box 100254, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States of America.
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, The University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32603, United States of America; Perioperative Cognitive Anesthesia Network (PeCAN), UF Health Shands Hospital, 1600 SW Archer Road Suite 1111, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States of America.
J Clin Anesth. 2020 Jun;62:109724. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109724. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
There are few cognitive screening tools appropriate for fast-paced settings with limited staffing, and particularly in preoperative evaluation clinics. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) convened experts in neuropsychology, geriatric medicine, and anesthesiology to conduct a review of the literature and compile a comprehensive list of cognitive screening tools used within primary care and preoperative settings. This Recommendations Statement: 1. summarizes a review of the literature on existing cognitive screening tools used within preoperative settings; 2. discusses factors to consider when selecting cognitive screening tools in a preoperative environment; and 3. includes a work flow diagram to guide use of these screening measures. Methodology involved searching peer-reviewed literature for 29 cognitive screening tools which were identified from the literature that fit inclusion criteria. Of these 29, seven tests have been used in preoperative settings and are discussed. These seven had an average administration time ranging from one to ten minutes. Memory, language, and attention were the most commonly evaluated cognitive domains. Most had adequate sensitivity and specificity to detect cognitive impairment/dementia. While information on the psychometric properties of these tools is limited, the tools discussed are appropriate for lay examiners, are short in duration, and accessible for free or at a low cost. We describe factors that must be considered prior to instrument selection.
适合人员配备有限的快节奏环境,尤其是术前评估诊所的认知筛查工具很少。围手术期评估与质量改进协会(SPAQI)召集了神经心理学、老年医学和麻醉学领域的专家,对文献进行综述,并编制了一份在初级保健和术前环境中使用的认知筛查工具综合清单。本推荐声明:1. 总结了对术前环境中使用的现有认知筛查工具的文献综述;2. 讨论了在术前环境中选择认知筛查工具时应考虑的因素;3. 包括一个工作流程图,以指导这些筛查措施的使用。方法包括在同行评审文献中搜索29种认知筛查工具,这些工具是从符合纳入标准的文献中确定的。在这29种工具中,有7种测试已在术前环境中使用并进行了讨论。这7种测试的平均施用时间为1至10分钟。记忆、语言和注意力是最常评估的认知领域。大多数工具对检测认知障碍/痴呆具有足够的敏感性和特异性。虽然关于这些工具心理测量特性的信息有限,但所讨论的工具适合外行检查人员,持续时间短,可免费或以低成本获取。我们描述了在选择工具之前必须考虑的因素。