Abdolkhani Robab, Gray Kathleen, Borda Ann, DeSouza Ruth
Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
JAMIA Open. 2019 Sep 20;2(4):471-478. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz036. eCollection 2019 Dec.
Patient-Generated Health Data (PGHD) in remote monitoring programs is a promising source of precise, personalized data, encouraged by expanding growth in the health technologies market. However, PGHD utilization in clinical settings is low. One of the critical challenges that impedes confident clinical use of PGHD is that these data are not managed according to any recognized approach for data quality assurance.
This article aims to identify the PGHD management and quality challenges that such an approach must address, as these are expressed by key PGHD stakeholder groups.
In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 experts who have experience in the use of PGHD in remote patient monitoring, including: healthcare providers, health information professionals within clinical settings, and commercial providers of remote monitoring solutions. Participants were asked to describe PGHD management processes in the remote monitoring programs in which they are involved, and to express their perspectives on PGHD quality challenges during the data management stages.
The remote monitoring programs in the study did not follow clear PGHD management or quality assurance approach. Participants were not fully aware of all the considerations of PGHD quality. Digital health literacy, wearable accuracy, difficulty in data interpretation, and lack of PGHD integration with electronic medical record systems were among the key challenges identified that impact PGHD quality.
Co-development of PGHD quality guidelines with relevant stakeholders, including patients, is needed to ensure that quality remote monitoring data from wearables is available for use in more precise and personalized patient care.
在健康技术市场不断发展的推动下,远程监测项目中的患者生成健康数据(PGHD)是精确、个性化数据的一个有前景的来源。然而,PGHD在临床环境中的利用率较低。阻碍PGHD在临床中得到可靠应用的关键挑战之一是,这些数据没有按照任何公认的数据质量保证方法进行管理。
本文旨在确定这种方法必须解决的PGHD管理和质量挑战,这些挑战由关键的PGHD利益相关者群体提出。
对20位在远程患者监测中使用PGHD方面有经验的专家进行了深入访谈,包括:医疗服务提供者、临床环境中的健康信息专业人员以及远程监测解决方案的商业提供者。参与者被要求描述他们所参与的远程监测项目中的PGHD管理流程,并就数据管理阶段的PGHD质量挑战发表看法。
研究中的远程监测项目没有遵循明确的PGHD管理或质量保证方法。参与者并未充分意识到PGHD质量的所有考量因素。数字健康素养、可穿戴设备的准确性、数据解读困难以及PGHD与电子病历系统缺乏整合是所确定的影响PGHD质量的关键挑战。
需要与包括患者在内的相关利益者共同制定PGHD质量指南,以确保来自可穿戴设备的高质量远程监测数据可用于更精确和个性化的患者护理。