Stetter Bernd J, Krafft Frieder C, Ringhof Steffen, Stein Thorsten, Sell Stefan
Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Department of Sport and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Jan 24;8:9. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00009. eCollection 2020.
Joint moment measurements represent an objective biomechanical parameter of knee joint load in knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Wearable sensors in combination with machine learning techniques may provide solutions to develop assistive devices in KOA patients to improve disease treatment and to minimize risk of non-functional overreaching (e.g., pain). The purpose of this study was to develop an artificial neural network (ANN) that estimates external knee flexion moments (KFM) and external knee adduction moments (KAM) during various locomotion tasks, based on data obtained by two wearable sensors. Thirteen participants were instrumented with two inertial measurement units (IMUs) located on the right thigh and shank. Participants performed six different locomotion tasks consisting of linear motions and motions with a change of direction, while IMU signals as well as full body kinematics and ground reaction forces were synchronously recorded. KFM and KAM were determined using a full body biomechanical model. An ANN was trained to estimate the KFM and KAM time series using the IMU signals as input. Evaluation of the ANN was done using a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. Concordance of the ANN-estimated KFM and reference data was categorized for five tasks (walking straight, 90° walking turn, moderate running, 90° running turn and 45° cutting maneuver) as strong ( ≥ 0.69, rRMSE ≤ 23.1) and as moderate for fast running ( = 0.65 ± 0.43, rRMSE = 25.5 ± 7.0%). For all locomotion tasks, KAM yielded a lower concordance in comparison to the KFM, ranging from weak ( ≤ 0.21, rRMSE ≥ 33.8%) in cutting and fast running to strong ( = 0.71 ± 0.26, rRMSE = 22.3 ± 8.3%) for walking straight. Smallest mean difference of classical discrete load metrics was seen for KFM impulse, 10.6 ± 47.0%. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using only two IMUs to estimate KFM and KAM to a limited extent. This methodological step facilitates further work that should aim to improve the estimation accuracy to provide valuable biofeedback systems for KOA patients. Greater accuracy of effective implementation could be achieved by a participant- or task-specific ANN modeling.
关节力矩测量是膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)中膝关节负荷的客观生物力学参数。可穿戴传感器与机器学习技术相结合,可能为开发KOA患者的辅助设备提供解决方案,以改善疾病治疗并将非功能性过度训练(如疼痛)的风险降至最低。本研究的目的是基于两个可穿戴传感器获得的数据,开发一种人工神经网络(ANN),用于估计各种运动任务期间的外部膝关节屈曲力矩(KFM)和外部膝关节内收力矩(KAM)。13名参与者在右大腿和小腿上安装了两个惯性测量单元(IMU)。参与者执行了六种不同的运动任务,包括直线运动和方向改变的运动,同时同步记录IMU信号以及全身运动学和地面反作用力。使用全身生物力学模型确定KFM和KAM。训练一个ANN,以IMU信号作为输入来估计KFM和KAM时间序列。使用留一法交叉验证对ANN进行评估。对于五项任务(直线行走、90°行走转弯、适度跑步、90°跑步转弯和45°切入动作),ANN估计的KFM与参考数据的一致性被分类为强(≥0.69,rRMSE≤23.1),对于快速跑步则为中等(=0.65±0.43,rRMSE=25.5±7.0%)。对于所有运动任务,与KFM相比,KAM的一致性较低,从切入和快速跑步时的弱(≤0.21,rRMSE≥33.8%)到直线行走时的强(=0.71±0.26,rRMSE=22.3±8.3%)。KFM冲量的经典离散负荷指标的平均差异最小,为10.6±47.0%。结果表明,仅使用两个IMU在有限程度上估计KFM和KAM是可行的。这一方法步骤有助于进一步开展工作,旨在提高估计精度,为KOA患者提供有价值的生物反馈系统。通过针对参与者或任务的ANN建模可以实现更高的有效实施精度。