Department of Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Jena (University Hospital Jena), Jena, Germany.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Jena (University Hospital Jena), Jena, Thüringen, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 9;10(2):e030088. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030088.
Q fever is a zoonosis caused by the bacterium . It is recognised as an occupational hazard for individuals who are in regular contact with animal birth products. Data from the literature are not comparable because different serological assays perform very differently in detecting past infections. It is therefore essential to choose the right assay for obtaining reliable data of seroprevalence. Obstetricians are another profession potentially at risk of Q fever. They can be infected from birth products of women with Q fever during pregnancy. There is little data, however, for Q fever in this occupational group. Our study therefore had two purposes. The first was to obtain reliable seroprevalence data for occupational groups in regular contact with animal birth products by using an assay with proven excellent sensitivity and specificity for detecting past infections. The second purpose was to obtain primary data for obstetricians.
We carried out a cross-sectional study.
The study included shepherds, cattle farmers, veterinarians and obstetricians from Thuringia.
77 shepherds, 74 veterinarians, 14 cattle farmers, 17 office employees and 68 obstetricians participated. The control group consisted of 92 blood donors.
The primary outcome measure was phase II specific IgG. The assay used was evaluated for this purpose in a previous study.
Of the 250 blood samples we analysed, the very highest seroprevalences (64%-77%) occurred in individuals with frequent animal contact. There were no significant differences between shepherds, cattle farmers and veterinarians. The seroprevalence in people working in administration was lower but still significantly greater than the control. No obstetricians or midwives tested positive.
Shepherds, cattle farmers and veterinarians have a high risk of infection. However, our study clearly proves that there was no increased risk for people working in an obstetric department.
Q 热是由细菌引起的一种动物传染病。它被认为是与动物分娩产品经常接触的个体的职业危害。由于不同的血清学检测方法在检测过去感染方面的表现差异很大,因此文献中的数据不可比。因此,选择正确的检测方法对于获得可靠的血清流行率数据至关重要。妇产科医生是另一个可能面临 Q 热风险的职业。他们可能会在孕妇分娩产品中感染 Q 热。然而,对于这个职业群体的 Q 热,数据很少。因此,我们的研究有两个目的。第一个目的是通过使用一种具有出色敏感性和特异性的检测方法,为经常接触动物分娩产品的职业群体获得可靠的血清流行率数据,该检测方法已被证明可用于检测过去的感染。第二个目的是为妇产科医生获得原始数据。
我们进行了一项横断面研究。
研究包括来自图林根州的牧羊人、奶牛农民、兽医和妇产科医生。
77 名牧羊人、74 名兽医、14 名奶牛农民、17 名办公室员工和 68 名妇产科医生参加了研究。对照组由 92 名献血者组成。
主要观察指标为 II 期特异性 IgG。为此目的,我们在之前的一项研究中评估了所使用的检测方法。
在我们分析的 250 份血样中,接触动物最频繁的个体的血清阳性率(64%-77%)最高。牧羊人、奶牛农民和兽医之间没有显著差异。在行政管理部门工作的人的血清阳性率较低,但仍明显高于对照组。没有妇产科医生或助产士检测呈阳性。
牧羊人、奶牛农民和兽医感染 Q 热的风险很高。然而,我们的研究清楚地证明,妇产科部门工作人员的风险没有增加。