• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂心血管介入治疗的过程评估:如何解读我的试验结果?

Process evaluation of complex cardiovascular interventions: How to interpret the results of my trial?

机构信息

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Mar;19(3):269-274. doi: 10.1177/1474515120906561. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1177/1474515120906561
PMID:32054300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7065447/
Abstract

Complex interventions of varying degrees of complexity are commonly used and evaluated in cardiovascular nursing and allied professions. Such interventions are increasingly tested using randomized trial designs. However, process evaluations are seldom used to better understand the results of these trials. Process evaluation aims to understand how complex interventions create change by evaluating implementation, mechanisms of impact, and the surrounding context when delivering an intervention. As such, this method can illuminate important mechanisms and clarify variation in results. In this article, process evaluation is described according to the Medical Research Council guidance and its use exemplified through a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a transition program for adolescents with chronic conditions.

摘要

复杂干预措施在心血管护理和相关专业中被广泛应用和评估,其复杂程度各有不同。此类干预措施越来越多地采用随机试验设计进行测试。然而,很少使用过程评估来更好地理解这些试验的结果。过程评估旨在通过评估实施情况、影响机制以及在实施干预时的周围环境,了解复杂干预措施如何产生变化。因此,这种方法可以阐明重要的机制并澄清结果的差异。本文根据医学研究委员会的指导描述了过程评估,并通过一项评估青少年慢性病过渡项目有效性的随机对照试验说明了其应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/015f/7065447/0bf037d2c651/10.1177_1474515120906561-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/015f/7065447/d88025cdf6e7/10.1177_1474515120906561-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/015f/7065447/83d676c71f49/10.1177_1474515120906561-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/015f/7065447/0bf037d2c651/10.1177_1474515120906561-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/015f/7065447/d88025cdf6e7/10.1177_1474515120906561-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/015f/7065447/83d676c71f49/10.1177_1474515120906561-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/015f/7065447/0bf037d2c651/10.1177_1474515120906561-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Process evaluation of complex cardiovascular interventions: How to interpret the results of my trial?复杂心血管介入治疗的过程评估:如何解读我的试验结果?
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Mar;19(3):269-274. doi: 10.1177/1474515120906561. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Rudiments of subgroup analyses.亚组分析基础。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Jan-Feb;54(4):338-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2011.07.005.
4
Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.生物医学研究文章中你也能发现的20个统计错误。
Croat Med J. 2004 Aug;45(4):361-70.
5
Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?生物医学期刊中的数据呈现与统计检验的应用:我们能达成共识吗?
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2011 May;38(5):285-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2011.05508.x.
6
Cluster randomized trials of individual-level interventions were at high risk of bias.针对个体干预措施的整群随机试验存在较高的偏倚风险。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;138:49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.021. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
7
Guidance on Statistical Reporting to Help Improve Your Chances of a Favorable Statistical Review.统计报告指南,助您提高获得有利统计评审的几率。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 1;201(9):1035-1038. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0477ED.
8
The fragility index can be used for sample size calculations in clinical trials.脆性指数可用于临床试验的样本量计算。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
9
Transition program for adolescents with congenital heart disease in transition to adulthood: protocol for a mixed-method process evaluation study (the STEPSTONES project).先天性心脏病青少年向成年过渡期的过渡项目:混合方法过程评估研究方案(STEPSTONES 项目)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 2;9(8):e028229. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028229.
10
An update on data reporting standards.数据报告标准的最新情况。
Nat Cell Biol. 2014 May;16(5):385. doi: 10.1038/ncb2964.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a team-based versus individual clinician-focused training approach on primary healthcare professionals' intention to have serious illness conversations with patients: A theory-informed process evaluation embedded within a cluster randomized trial.基于团队与以个体临床医生为中心的培训方法对初级医疗保健专业人员与患者进行重病谈话意愿的影响:一项纳入整群随机试验的理论导向过程评估
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 26;20(3):e0298994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298994. eCollection 2025.
2
Children's, parents', and teachers' experiences of the feasibility of a telerehabilitation intervention for children with acquired brain injury in the chronic phase - a qualitative study of acceptability and participation in the Child In Context Intervention (CICI).儿童、家长和教师对脑损伤后慢性期儿童远程康复干预可行性的体验 - 对接受性和参与儿童情境干预(CICI)的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):603. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09589-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A mixed methods process evaluation of a person-centred falls prevention program.一项以个人为中心的跌倒预防计划的混合方法过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 28;19(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4614-z.
2
Tele-rehabilitation and hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation are comparable in increasing patient activation and health literacy: A pilot study.远程康复和医院内心脏康复在提高患者积极性和健康素养方面具有可比性:一项试点研究。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Jun;19(5):376-385. doi: 10.1177/1474515119885325. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
3
Systematic review of the use of process evaluations in knowledge translation research.
What do we want to get out of this? a critical interpretive synthesis of the value of process evaluations, with a practical planning framework.我们想从中学到什么?对过程评估价值的批判性综合分析,以及一个实用的规划框架。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 25;22(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01767-7.
4
Implementation of a Health Promotion Practice Using Individually Targeted Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Health Care: Protocol for the "Act in Time" Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Study.在初级卫生保健中采用个性化生活方式干预措施实施健康促进实践:“及时行动”混合方法过程评估研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Aug 19;11(8):e37634. doi: 10.2196/37634.
5
Actively incorporating lifestyle modifications into daily life: The key to adherence in a lifestyle intervention programme for metabolic syndrome.积极将生活方式改变融入日常生活:代谢综合征生活方式干预计划中坚持的关键。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;10:929043. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.929043. eCollection 2022.
6
Development and feasibility of culturally sensitive family-oriented dignity therapy for Chinese patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy.针对接受化疗的中国肺癌患者的具有文化敏感性的家庭导向尊严疗法的开发与可行性研究
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Apr 30;9(9):100078. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100078. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Technology Acceptance of Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation Programs in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: Systematic Scoping Review.基于家庭的心脏远程康复计划在冠心病患者中的技术接受度:系统范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 7;24(1):e34657. doi: 10.2196/34657.
系统评价知识转化研究中过程评估的使用。
Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 7;8(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1161-y.
4
Empowering Young Persons with Congenital Heart Disease: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop a Transition Program - The STEPSTONES Project.赋能先天性心脏病青年患者:运用干预映射方法开发一项过渡项目——STEPSTONES 项目。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Jan-Feb;50:e8-e17. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2019.09.021. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
5
The development and pilot study of a nurse-led HOMe-based HEart failure self-Management Programme (the HOM-HEMP) for patients with chronic heart failure, following Medical Research Council guidelines.一项遵循医学研究委员会指南,由护士主导的针对慢性心力衰竭患者的居家心力衰竭自我管理项目(HOM-HEMP)的开发与试点研究。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Mar;19(3):212-222. doi: 10.1177/1474515119872853. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
6
Transition program for adolescents with congenital heart disease in transition to adulthood: protocol for a mixed-method process evaluation study (the STEPSTONES project).先天性心脏病青少年向成年过渡期的过渡项目:混合方法过程评估研究方案(STEPSTONES 项目)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 2;9(8):e028229. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028229.
7
Mind-body interactive qigong improves physical and mental aspects of quality of life in inpatients with stroke: A randomized control study.身心互动气功改善脑卒中住院患者身心方面的生活质量:一项随机对照研究。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Dec;18(8):658-666. doi: 10.1177/1474515119860232. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
8
Implementation fidelity in a complex intervention promoting psychosocial well-being following stroke: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study.在一项复杂干预措施中促进中风后心理社会健康的实施保真度:一项解释性顺序混合方法研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 15;19(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0694-z.
9
From complex social interventions to interventions in complex social systems: Future directions and unresolved questions for intervention development and evaluation.从复杂社会干预到复杂社会系统中的干预:干预发展与评估的未来方向及未解决的问题。
Evaluation (Lond). 2019 Jan;25(1):23-45. doi: 10.1177/1356389018803219. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
10
Development and effects of a self-management efficacy promotion program for adult patients with congenital heart disease.先天性心脏病成年患者自我管理效能促进方案的制定与效果
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Feb;18(2):140-148. doi: 10.1177/1474515118800099. Epub 2018 Sep 10.