van Niekerk Gustav, Meaker Charné, Engelbrecht Anna-Mart
Department of Physiological Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Crit Care. 2020 Feb 14;24(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2771-4.
Despite sound basis to suspect that aggressive and early administration of nutritional support may hold therapeutic benefits during sepsis, recommendations for nutritional support have been somewhat underwhelming. Current guidelines (ESPEN and ASPEN) recognise a lack of clear evidence demonstrating the beneficial effect of nutritional support during sepsis, raising the question: why, given the perceived low efficacy of nutritionals support, are there no high-quality clinical trials on the efficacy of permissive underfeeding in sepsis? Here, we review clinically relevant beneficial effects of permissive underfeeding, motivating the urgent need to investigate the clinical benefits of delaying nutritional support during sepsis.
尽管有充分的理由怀疑在脓毒症期间积极且早期给予营养支持可能具有治疗益处,但营养支持的相关建议却有些不尽人意。当前的指南(欧洲临床营养和代谢学会及美国肠外肠内营养学会)认识到缺乏明确证据表明营养支持在脓毒症期间具有有益效果,这就引发了一个问题:鉴于营养支持的疗效被认为较低,为何没有关于脓毒症中允许性低热量喂养疗效的高质量临床试验呢?在此,我们回顾允许性低热量喂养的临床相关有益效果,从而促使迫切需要研究在脓毒症期间延迟营养支持的临床益处。