• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EAT-柳叶刀委员会的饮食构成可能无法预防非传染性疾病死亡率。

The EAT-Lancet Commission's Dietary Composition May Not Prevent Noncommunicable Disease Mortality.

机构信息

EpiX Analytics, Fort Collins, USA.

出版信息

J Nutr. 2020 May 1;150(5):985-988. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa020.

DOI:10.1093/jn/nxaa020
PMID:32061173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7198286/
Abstract

The recently published EAT-Lancet Commission report on dietary impacts on the environment suggested that their proposed diet could prevent more than 10 million annual premature mortalities from noncommunicable diseases globally. The report did not meet standards for transparency and replicability, nor did it fully account for statistical uncertainty. Our attempt to replicate the mortality calculations for the United States revealed flaws in the assumptions and methods used to estimate the avoided mortalities. After correcting some calculation errors and fully accounting for uncertainty in the avoided mortalities, the mortality reduction effect of the EAT-Lancet proposed diet in the USA is no greater than the impact of energy consumption changes that would prevent under-weight, over-weight, and obesity alone. As our findings call into question the global conclusions of the EAT-Lancet report, futher independent validation is needed before it can be used to inform dietary guidelines.

摘要

最近发表的《柳叶刀饮食委员会报告》(EAT-Lancet Commission report)探讨了饮食对环境的影响,该报告指出,他们建议的饮食方案可以预防全球超过 1000 万人因非传染性疾病而过早死亡。然而,该报告不符合透明度和可重复性标准,也没有充分考虑统计不确定性。我们试图复制美国的死亡率计算,结果发现用于估计避免死亡人数的假设和方法存在缺陷。在纠正了一些计算错误并充分考虑避免死亡人数的不确定性之后,EAT-Lancet 所建议的饮食方案在美国对降低死亡率的影响并不大于单独预防体重过轻、超重和肥胖的能量消耗变化的影响。由于我们的研究结果对《柳叶刀饮食委员会报告》的全球结论提出了质疑,因此在将其用于指导饮食建议之前,需要进一步进行独立验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2006/7198286/1aecac160259/nxaa020fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2006/7198286/1aecac160259/nxaa020fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2006/7198286/1aecac160259/nxaa020fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The EAT-Lancet Commission's Dietary Composition May Not Prevent Noncommunicable Disease Mortality.EAT-柳叶刀委员会的饮食构成可能无法预防非传染性疾病死亡率。
J Nutr. 2020 May 1;150(5):985-988. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa020.
2
The healthiness and sustainability of national and global food based dietary guidelines: modelling study.国家和全球基于食物的膳食指南的健康和可持续性:建模研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 15;370:m2322. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2322.
3
The EAT-Lancet Commission's Planetary Health Diet Compared With the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Global Burden of Disease Ecological Data Analysis.与健康指标与评估研究所全球疾病负担生态数据分析相比,《柳叶刀》委员会的全球健康饮食计划。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 6;15(6):e40061. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40061. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Affordability of the EAT-Lancet reference diet: a global analysis.EAT-柳叶刀参考饮食的负担能力:全球分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jan;8(1):e59-e66. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30447-4. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
5
Development of an EAT-Lancet index and its relation to mortality in a Swedish population.开发 EAT-柳叶刀指数及其与瑞典人群死亡率的关系。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar 4;115(3):705-716. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab369.
6
Aligning Santal Tribe Menu Templates with EAT-Lancet Commission's Dietary Guidelines for Sustainable and Healthy Diets: A Comparative Analysis.调整桑塔部落菜单模板以符合 EAT-柳叶刀委员会的可持续和健康饮食指南:比较分析。
Nutrients. 2024 Feb 2;16(3):447. doi: 10.3390/nu16030447.
7
Co-benefits of the EAT-Lancet diet for environmental protection in the framework of the Spanish dietary pattern.在西班牙饮食模式框架下,EAT-柳叶刀饮食对环境保护的共同效益。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 25;836:155683. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155683. Epub 2022 May 5.
8
Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet in relation to mortality and exposure to food contaminants in population-based cohorts of Swedish men and women.基于瑞典男女人群队列的研究显示,遵循 EAT-柳叶刀饮食与死亡率和食物污染物暴露的关系。
Environ Int. 2024 Feb;184:108495. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108495. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
9
Environmental impact of Norwegian self-selected diets: comparing current intake with national dietary guidelines and EAT-Lancet targets.挪威自选饮食的环境影响:当前摄入量与国家饮食指南和 EAT-柳叶刀目标的比较。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Mar 25;27(1):e100. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000715.
10
Modelling impacts of food industry co-regulation on noncommunicable disease mortality, Portugal.模拟食品行业共同监管对葡萄牙非传染性疾病死亡率的影响。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Jul 1;97(7):450-459. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.220566. Epub 2018 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Planetary health diet, mediterranean diet and micronutrient intake adequacy in the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) cohort.纳瓦拉大学跟踪研究(SUN)队列中的行星健康饮食、地中海饮食与微量营养素摄入充足情况
Eur J Nutr. 2025 Apr 9;64(4):149. doi: 10.1007/s00394-025-03657-2.
2
Examining the link between adherence to the planetary health diet pattern and mortality in the us: a prospective cohort study.探究美国遵循行星健康饮食模式与死亡率之间的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Nutr. 2025 Feb 1;64(2):79. doi: 10.1007/s00394-025-03595-z.
3
Plant-based diets-impacts of consumption of little or no animal-source foods on human health.

本文引用的文献

1
Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations From the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) Consortium.未加工的红色肉类和加工肉类的消费:营养建议(NutriRECS)联盟的膳食指南建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 19;171(10):756-764. doi: 10.7326/M19-1621. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
2
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
3
The Challenge of Reforming Nutritional Epidemiologic Research.
植物性饮食——极少或不食用动物源食物对人类健康的影响。
Front Nutr. 2024 Sep 18;11:1423925. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1423925. eCollection 2024.
4
The MED_EAT-IT approach: A modelling study to develop feasible, sustainable and nutritionally targeted dietary patterns based on the Planetary health diet.MED_EAT-IT方法:一项基于行星健康饮食制定可行、可持续且营养目标明确的饮食模式的建模研究。
Curr Res Food Sci. 2024 May 7;8:100765. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100765. eCollection 2024.
5
"Climate-friendly" diets from an allergy point of view.从过敏角度看“气候友好型”饮食。
Allergol Select. 2024 May 3;8:199-205. doi: 10.5414/ALX02471E. eCollection 2024.
6
How to Build Healthy Societies: A Thematic Analysis of Relevant Conceptual Frameworks.如何构建健康社会:相关概念框架的主题分析
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7451. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7451. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
7
Social and economic dimensions of food sustainability - a background paper for the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations.食物可持续性的社会与经济层面——北欧营养建议背景文件
Food Nutr Res. 2024 Feb 5;68. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10450. eCollection 2024.
8
Unacceptable use of substandard metrics in policy decisions which mandate large reductions in animal-source foods.在要求大幅减少动物源食品的政策决策中使用不合格指标的不可接受行为。
NPJ Sci Food. 2024 Feb 5;8(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41538-024-00249-y.
9
Global trends and research hotspots of EAT-Lancet diet: a bibliometric analysis.《柳叶刀-饮食委员会》饮食的全球趋势与研究热点:一项文献计量分析
Front Nutr. 2024 Jan 5;10:1328351. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1328351. eCollection 2023.
10
Sustainable dietary patterns and all-cause mortality among US adults.美国成年人可持续的饮食模式与全因死亡率。
Int J Epidemiol. 2024 Feb 1;53(1). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad176.
营养流行病学研究改革的挑战
JAMA. 2018 Sep 11;320(10):969-970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.11025.
4
Health and nutritional aspects of sustainable diet strategies and their association with environmental impacts: a global modelling analysis with country-level detail.可持续饮食策略的健康和营养方面及其与环境影响的关联:具有国家层面细节的全球建模分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Oct;2(10):e451-e461. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30206-7.
5
Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer.食物种类与结直肠癌风险。
Int J Cancer. 2018 May 1;142(9):1748-1758. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31198. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
6
Red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.红肉及加工肉类的摄入量与结直肠癌风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 6;8(47):83306-83314. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20667. eCollection 2017 Oct 10.
7
Foods and beverages and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies, an update of the evidence of the WCRF-AICR Continuous Update Project.食物和饮料与结直肠癌风险:队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析,对 WCRF-AICR 连续更新项目证据的更新。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1788-1802. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx171.
8
Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1990 - 2015年79种行为、环境与职业及代谢风险或风险群组的全球、区域和国家比较风险评估:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1659-1724. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8.
9
Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement.准确透明健康估计报告指南:GATHER 声明。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):e19-e23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30388-9. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
10
Red Meat and Colorectal Cancer: A Quantitative Update on the State of the Epidemiologic Science.红肉与结直肠癌:流行病学科学现状的定量更新
J Am Coll Nutr. 2015;34(6):521-43. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2014.992553. Epub 2015 May 5.