• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威自选饮食的环境影响:当前摄入量与国家饮食指南和 EAT-柳叶刀目标的比较。

Environmental impact of Norwegian self-selected diets: comparing current intake with national dietary guidelines and EAT-Lancet targets.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo0316, Norway.

SINTEF Ocean, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2024 Mar 25;27(1):e100. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000715.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980024000715
PMID:38523532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11010176/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Dietary environmental impact in a Norwegian adult population was estimated for six environmental impact categories. Moreover, environmental benefits of scenario diets complying with the Norwegian Food-Based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG) and the EAT-Lancet reference diet were assessed.

DESIGN

The current diet of Norwegian adults was estimated according to 24-h dietary recall data from a national dietary surveillance survey (Norkost 3). Scenario diets were modelled to represent the Norwegian FBDG and the EAT-Lancet healthy reference diet. Dietary environmental impact in terms of global warming potential, freshwater and marine eutrophication, terrestrial acidification, water use and transformation and use of land was estimated for the current and scenario diets using environmental impact data representative of the Norwegian market. Significant associations between impact and gender/educational attainment were assessed at < 0·05.

SETTING

Norway.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (=1787) aged 18-70 years who participated in the Norkost 3 survey (2010-2011).

RESULTS

Environmental impact varied significantly by gender and educational attainment. The food groups contributing most to environmental impact of Norwegian diets were meat, dairy, beverages, grains and composite dishes. Compared with the current Norwegian diet, the FBDG scenario reduced impacts from 2 % (freshwater eutrophication) to 32 % (water use), while the EAT-Lancet scenario reduced impacts from 7 % (marine eutrophication) to 61 % (land use). The EAT-Lancet scenario resulted in 3-48 % larger reductions in impact than the FBDG scenario.

CONCLUSIONS

The Norwegian FBDG, while not as environmentally friendly as the EAT-Lancet reference diet, can still be an important tool in lessening environmental burden of Norwegian diets.

摘要

目的

估计了挪威成年人中六种环境影响类别下的饮食环境影响。此外,还评估了符合挪威食物为基础的饮食指南(FBDG)和 EAT-柳叶刀参考饮食的情景饮食的环境效益。

设计

根据国家饮食监测调查(Norkost 3)的 24 小时饮食回忆数据,估计了挪威成年人的当前饮食。为了代表挪威 FBDG 和 EAT-柳叶刀健康参考饮食,模拟了情景饮食。使用代表挪威市场的环境影响数据,估算了当前和情景饮食的全球变暖潜势、淡水和海洋富营养化、陆地酸化、水利用和转化以及土地利用方面的饮食环境影响。在 < 0·05 水平上评估了影响与性别/教育程度之间的显著关联。

地点

挪威。

参与者

参加 Norkost 3 调查(2010-2011 年)的年龄在 18-70 岁的成年人(1787 人)。

结果

环境影响因性别和教育程度而异。对挪威饮食环境影响贡献最大的食物组是肉类、奶制品、饮料、谷物和综合菜肴。与当前的挪威饮食相比,FBDG 情景减少了 2%(淡水富营养化)至 32%(水利用)的影响,而 EAT-柳叶刀情景减少了 7%(海洋富营养化)至 61%(土地利用)的影响。EAT-柳叶刀情景的影响减少幅度比 FBDG 情景大 3-48%。

结论

尽管挪威 FBDG 不如 EAT-柳叶刀参考饮食环保,但它仍然是减轻挪威饮食环境负担的重要工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/141d/11010176/f0b5f63be522/S1368980024000715_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/141d/11010176/c0a2d25352ae/S1368980024000715_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/141d/11010176/f0b5f63be522/S1368980024000715_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/141d/11010176/c0a2d25352ae/S1368980024000715_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/141d/11010176/f0b5f63be522/S1368980024000715_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Environmental impact of Norwegian self-selected diets: comparing current intake with national dietary guidelines and EAT-Lancet targets.挪威自选饮食的环境影响:当前摄入量与国家饮食指南和 EAT-柳叶刀目标的比较。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Mar 25;27(1):e100. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000715.
2
Environmental and nutritional assessment of young children's diets in Norway: comparing the current diet with national dietary guidelines and the EAT-Lancet reference diet.挪威幼儿饮食的环境和营养评估:比较现行饮食与国家饮食指南和 EAT-柳叶刀参考饮食。
Eur J Nutr. 2023 Dec;62(8):3383-3396. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03243-4. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
3
Differences in the cost and environmental impact between the current diet in Brazil and healthy and sustainable diets: a modeling study.巴西现行饮食与健康可持续饮食的成本和环境影响差异:建模研究。
Nutr J. 2024 Jul 9;23(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12937-024-00973-x.
4
Towards healthier and more sustainable diets in the Australian context: comparison of current diets with the Australian Dietary Guidelines and the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet.在澳大利亚背景下实现更健康、更可持续的饮食:当前饮食与澳大利亚饮食指南和 EAT-柳叶刀星球健康饮食的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;22(1):1939. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14252-z.
5
The healthiness and sustainability of national and global food based dietary guidelines: modelling study.国家和全球基于食物的膳食指南的健康和可持续性:建模研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 15;370:m2322. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2322.
6
The Environmental Footprint Associated With the Mediterranean Diet, EAT-Lancet Diet, and the Sustainable Healthy Diet Index: A Population-Based Study.与地中海饮食、EAT-柳叶刀饮食及可持续健康饮食指数相关的环境足迹:一项基于人群的研究
Front Nutr. 2022 May 19;9:870883. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.870883. eCollection 2022.
7
Balancing a sustained pursuit of nutrition, health, affordability and climate goals: exploring the case of Indonesia.平衡对营养、健康、可负担性和气候目标的持续追求:以印度尼西亚为例进行探讨。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Nov 8;114(5):1686-1697. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab258.
8
Dietary environmental impacts of French adults are poorly related to their income levels or food insecurity status.法国成年人的饮食对环境的影响与其收入水平或食物保障状况关系不大。
Eur J Nutr. 2023 Sep;62(6):2541-2553. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03163-3. Epub 2023 May 16.
9
Co-benefits of the EAT-Lancet diet for environmental protection in the framework of the Spanish dietary pattern.在西班牙饮食模式框架下,EAT-柳叶刀饮食对环境保护的共同效益。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 25;836:155683. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155683. Epub 2022 May 5.
10
Development of a Danish Adapted Healthy Plant-Based Diet Based on the EAT-Lancet Reference Diet.基于 EAT-柳叶刀参考饮食开发丹麦适应性健康植物性饮食。
Nutrients. 2020 Mar 11;12(3):738. doi: 10.3390/nu12030738.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental impact of food consumption and sociodemographic factors in Northern Norway through an intersectional lens: a cross-sectional study.从交叉视角看挪威北部食物消费的环境影响及社会人口因素:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):2978. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23899-3.
2
Nutritionally adequate, healthy, and climate-friendly diets following the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023: an optimization study for Norway.遵循《2023年北欧营养建议》的营养充足、健康且气候友好型饮食:挪威的一项优化研究
Front Nutr. 2025 May 14;12:1485287. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1485287. eCollection 2025.
3
Exploring environmental and cardiometabolic impacts associated with adherence to the sustainable EAT-Lancet reference diet: findings from the China Health and Nutrition Survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Shifts towards healthy diets in the US can reduce environmental impacts but would be unaffordable for poorer minorities.在美国,转向健康饮食可以减少对环境的影响,但对较贫困的少数族裔来说可能难以承受。
Nat Food. 2021 Sep;2(9):664-672. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00350-5. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
2
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products.估算 57000 种食品的环境影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 16;119(33):e2120584119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120584119. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
3
Carbon Footprint Reduction by Transitioning to a Diet Consistent with the Danish Climate-Friendly Dietary Guidelines: A Comparison of Different Carbon Footprint Databases.
探索与坚持可持续的EAT-柳叶刀参考饮食相关的环境和心血管代谢影响:来自中国健康与营养调查的结果
Environ Health Perspect. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1289/EHP15006.
通过转向符合丹麦气候友好型饮食指南的饮食来减少碳足迹:不同碳足迹数据库的比较
Foods. 2022 Apr 13;11(8):1119. doi: 10.3390/foods11081119.
4
The Climate and Nutritional Impact of Beef in Different Dietary Patterns in Denmark.丹麦不同饮食模式中牛肉对气候和营养的影响。
Foods. 2020 Aug 25;9(9):1176. doi: 10.3390/foods9091176.
5
Traditional Self-Reported Dietary Instruments Are Prone to Inaccuracies and New Approaches Are Needed.传统的自我报告饮食工具容易出现不准确的情况,因此需要新的方法。
Front Nutr. 2020 Jul 3;7:90. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00090. eCollection 2020.
6
The healthiness and sustainability of national and global food based dietary guidelines: modelling study.国家和全球基于食物的膳食指南的健康和可持续性:建模研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 15;370:m2322. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2322.
7
Changes in dietary carbon footprint over ten years relative to individual characteristics and food intake in the Västerbotten Intervention Programme.十年间饮食碳足迹的变化与个体特征和食物摄入的关系——维斯特博滕干预项目。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 8;10(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56924-8.
8
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
9
Health and nutritional aspects of sustainable diet strategies and their association with environmental impacts: a global modelling analysis with country-level detail.可持续饮食策略的健康和营养方面及其与环境影响的关联:具有国家层面细节的全球建模分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Oct;2(10):e451-e461. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30206-7.
10
Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits.在环境限度内保持食物系统的选择。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):519-525. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0. Epub 2018 Oct 10.