Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, UK.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, UK.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 May;90(2):424-448. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12303. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
Aspects of the school environment, such as school attachment levels, are linked to adolescent offending. Previous research has not clarified whether a school- or individual-level intervention approach to improving pupil school attachment and commitment is most likely to reduce adolescent offending.
The present study assessed the impact of individual- and school-level variables on offending behaviour from ages 14-16 years.
The participants were 4,049 young people from 42 mainstream schools who took part in the Belfast Youth Development Study.
Multilevel modelling was used to examine the relative influence of individual- and school-level variables on offending behaviour in adolescence.
Pupils who had high levels of school commitment and attachment and were involved in fewer fights at age 13 reported lower levels of offending at age 14 years. Differences between schools accounted for 7% of the variation in offending. Lower individual-level commitment was associated with higher initial levels of offending at age 14 if the school-level ethos was of higher commitment. Lack of safety at the school level appeared to be detrimental for young people not exposed to socio-economic deprivation.
Individual-level targeted interventions are likely to be a more cost-effective approach of reducing offending behaviour in adolescence. Additional, albeit smaller, reductions in offending levels could be achieved through school-level interventions in some school types (e.g., deprived areas).
学校环境的各个方面,如学校归属感水平,与青少年犯罪有关。先前的研究尚未明确提高学生学校归属感和承诺的学校或个体干预方法最有可能减少青少年犯罪。
本研究评估了个体和学校层面的变量对 14-16 岁青少年犯罪行为的影响。
42 所主流学校的 4049 名年轻人参加了贝尔法斯特青年发展研究。
使用多层次模型来检查个体和学校层面变量对青少年犯罪行为的相对影响。
13 岁时表现出高水平学校承诺和归属感、参与打架较少的学生,在 14 岁时报告的犯罪行为水平较低。学校之间的差异占犯罪行为变异的 7%。如果学校风气具有更高的承诺,那么较低的个体承诺水平与 14 岁时更高的初始犯罪水平相关。在没有安全保障的学校环境中,社会经济剥夺程度较低的年轻人可能会受到不利影响。
针对个体的目标干预措施可能是减少青少年犯罪行为的更具成本效益的方法。通过在某些学校类型(如贫困地区)进行学校层面的干预,可以进一步减少犯罪水平,但效果较小。