• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学校氛围和风气对犯罪轨迹的影响:来自贝尔法斯特青年发展研究的结果。

School bonding and ethos in trajectories of offending: Results from the Belfast Youth Development Study.

机构信息

Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, UK.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, UK.

出版信息

Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 May;90(2):424-448. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12303. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1111/bjep.12303
PMID:32065389
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7317740/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aspects of the school environment, such as school attachment levels, are linked to adolescent offending. Previous research has not clarified whether a school- or individual-level intervention approach to improving pupil school attachment and commitment is most likely to reduce adolescent offending.

AIM

The present study assessed the impact of individual- and school-level variables on offending behaviour from ages 14-16 years.

SAMPLE

The participants were 4,049 young people from 42 mainstream schools who took part in the Belfast Youth Development Study.

METHOD

Multilevel modelling was used to examine the relative influence of individual- and school-level variables on offending behaviour in adolescence.

RESULTS

Pupils who had high levels of school commitment and attachment and were involved in fewer fights at age 13 reported lower levels of offending at age 14 years. Differences between schools accounted for 7% of the variation in offending. Lower individual-level commitment was associated with higher initial levels of offending at age 14 if the school-level ethos was of higher commitment. Lack of safety at the school level appeared to be detrimental for young people not exposed to socio-economic deprivation.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual-level targeted interventions are likely to be a more cost-effective approach of reducing offending behaviour in adolescence. Additional, albeit smaller, reductions in offending levels could be achieved through school-level interventions in some school types (e.g., deprived areas).

摘要

背景

学校环境的各个方面,如学校归属感水平,与青少年犯罪有关。先前的研究尚未明确提高学生学校归属感和承诺的学校或个体干预方法最有可能减少青少年犯罪。

目的

本研究评估了个体和学校层面的变量对 14-16 岁青少年犯罪行为的影响。

样本

42 所主流学校的 4049 名年轻人参加了贝尔法斯特青年发展研究。

方法

使用多层次模型来检查个体和学校层面变量对青少年犯罪行为的相对影响。

结果

13 岁时表现出高水平学校承诺和归属感、参与打架较少的学生,在 14 岁时报告的犯罪行为水平较低。学校之间的差异占犯罪行为变异的 7%。如果学校风气具有更高的承诺,那么较低的个体承诺水平与 14 岁时更高的初始犯罪水平相关。在没有安全保障的学校环境中,社会经济剥夺程度较低的年轻人可能会受到不利影响。

结论

针对个体的目标干预措施可能是减少青少年犯罪行为的更具成本效益的方法。通过在某些学校类型(如贫困地区)进行学校层面的干预,可以进一步减少犯罪水平,但效果较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed93/7317740/9d285be9c46e/BJEP-90-424-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed93/7317740/1d80a8c38f1f/BJEP-90-424-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed93/7317740/9d285be9c46e/BJEP-90-424-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed93/7317740/1d80a8c38f1f/BJEP-90-424-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed93/7317740/9d285be9c46e/BJEP-90-424-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
School bonding and ethos in trajectories of offending: Results from the Belfast Youth Development Study.学校氛围和风气对犯罪轨迹的影响:来自贝尔法斯特青年发展研究的结果。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 May;90(2):424-448. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12303. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
Disrupting the link between maltreatment and delinquency: how school, family, and community factors can be protective.破坏虐待与犯罪之间的联系:学校、家庭和社区因素如何起到保护作用。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 17;19(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6906-y.
3
Is This Kid a Likely Experimenter or a Likely Persister? An Analysis of Individual-Level and Family-Level Risk Factors Predicting Multiple Offending Among a Group of Adjudicated Youth.这个孩子是一个可能的冒险者还是一个可能的坚持者?对一组被判定有罪的青少年中预测多次犯罪的个人层面和家庭层面风险因素的分析。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Oct;62(13):4024-4045. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18755917. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
4
Links between trajectories of self-reported violent and nonviolent offending and official offending during adolescence and adulthood.青少年期及成年期自我报告的暴力及非暴力犯罪轨迹与官方犯罪记录之间的关联。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2014 Oct;24(4):277-90. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1935.
5
Trajectories of offending over 9 years after youths' first arrest: What predicts who desists and who continues to offend?青少年首次被捕后 9 年的犯罪轨迹:是什么预测了谁会停止犯罪,谁会继续犯罪?
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Dec;34(4):1312-1325. doi: 10.1111/jora.12926. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
6
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
7
Childhood predictors and age 48 outcomes of self-reports and official records of offending.童年期预测因素以及48岁时自我报告和官方犯罪记录的结果。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2014 Oct;24(4):291-304. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1929.
8
Race, Sex, and Discrimination in School Settings: A Multilevel Analysis of Associations With Delinquency.种族、性别与学校环境中的歧视:与犯罪行为关联的多层次分析。
J Sch Health. 2018 Feb;88(2):159-166. doi: 10.1111/josh.12589.
9
How effective are severe disciplinary policies? School policies and offending from adolescence into young adulthood.严厉的纪律政策有多有效?学校政策与青少年到青年初期的犯罪行为。
J Sch Psychol. 2011 Oct;49(5):555-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
10
Offending behaviours of child and adolescent firesetters over a 10-year follow-up.儿童和青少年纵火犯的冒犯行为:10 年随访研究
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;54(12):1295-307. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12126. Epub 2013 Aug 9.

本文引用的文献

1
The Belfast Youth Development Study (BYDS): A prospective cohort study of the initiation, persistence and desistance of substance use from adolescence to adulthood in Northern Ireland.贝尔法斯特青年发展研究(BYDS):北爱尔兰青少年至成年期物质使用的起始、持续和终止的前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0195192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195192. eCollection 2018.
2
Peer Influences on Adolescent Decision Making.同伴对青少年决策的影响。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr;22(2):114-120. doi: 10.1177/0963721412471347.
3
Incarcerated Youths' Perspectives on Protective Factors and Risk Factors for Juvenile Offending: A Qualitative Analysis.
被监禁青少年对青少年犯罪保护因素和风险因素的看法:一项定性分析。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jul;105(7):1365-71. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302228. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
4
Adolescent gang involvement: The role of individual, family, peer, and school factors in a multilevel perspective.青少年参与帮派活动:从多层次视角看个人、家庭、同伴和学校因素的作用。
Aggress Behav. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):386-97. doi: 10.1002/ab.21562. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
5
From the school yard to the squad car: school discipline, truancy, and arrest.从校园到警车:学校纪律、逃学和逮捕。
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Jul;43(7):1110-22. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0103-1. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
6
The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence.父母和同伴依恋量表:青少年个体差异及其与心理健康的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 1987 Oct;16(5):427-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02202939.
7
The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention.社会发展模式:预防犯罪的综合方法。
J Prim Prev. 1985 Dec;6(2):73-97. doi: 10.1007/BF01325432.
8
The influence of school demographic factors and perceived student discrimination on delinquency trajectory in adolescence.学校人口统计学因素和感知到的学生歧视对青少年犯罪轨迹的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2011 Oct;49(4):407-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 May 25.
9
Poor school bonding and delinquency over time: bidirectional effects and sex differences.较差的学校归属感和随着时间的推移而出现的犯罪行为:双向影响和性别差异。
J Adolesc. 2011 Feb;34(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.03.008. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
10
Biological, behavioral, and relational levels of resilience in the context of risk for early childhood behavior problems.幼儿行为问题风险背景下复原力的生物、行为和关系层面
Dev Psychopathol. 2007 Summer;19(3):675-700. doi: 10.1017/S095457940700034X.