Health Sciences Library, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Faculty of Information & Media Studies, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 18;15(2):e0228786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228786. eCollection 2020.
Wikipedia's health content is the most frequently visited resource for health information on the internet. While the literature provides strong evidence for its high usage, a comprehensive literature review of Wikipedia's role within the health context has not yet been reported.
To conduct a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed, published literature to learn what the existing body of literature says about Wikipedia as a health information resource and what publication trends exist, if any.
A comprehensive literature search in OVID Medline, OVID Embase, CINAHL, LISTA, Wilson's Web, AMED, and Web of Science was performed. Through a two-stage screening process, records were excluded if: Wikipedia was not a major or exclusive focus of the article; Wikipedia was not discussed within the context of a health or medical topic; the article was not available in English, the article was irretrievable, or; the article was a letter, commentary, editorial, or popular media article.
89 articles and conference proceedings were selected for inclusion in the review. Four categories of literature emerged: 1) studies that situate Wikipedia as a health information resource; 2) investigations into the quality of Wikipedia, 3) explorations of the utility of Wikipedia in education, and 4) studies that demonstrate the utility of Wikipedia in research.
The literature positions Wikipedia as a prominent health information resource in various contexts for the public, patients, students, and practitioners seeking health information online. Wikipedia's health content is accessed frequently, and its pages regularly rank highly in Google search results. While Wikipedia itself is well into its second decade, the academic discourse around Wikipedia within the context of health is still young and the academic literature is limited when attempts are made to understand Wikipedia as a health information resource. Possibilities for future research will be discussed.
维基百科的健康内容是互联网上最常被访问的健康信息资源。尽管文献提供了强有力的证据表明其使用率很高,但尚未有关于维基百科在健康背景下作用的全面文献综述。
对同行评议的已发表文献进行全面综述,了解现有文献对维基百科作为健康信息资源的看法,以及是否存在任何出版趋势。
在 OVID Medline、OVID Embase、CINAHL、LISTA、Wilson's Web、AMED 和 Web of Science 中进行了全面的文献检索。通过两阶段筛选过程,排除了以下记录:维基百科不是文章的主要或唯一重点;维基百科未在健康或医学主题背景下讨论;文章不是英文的;文章无法获取;或文章是信件、评论、社论或大众媒体文章。
有 89 篇文章和会议论文被选入综述。出现了四类文献:1)将维基百科定位为健康信息资源的研究;2)对维基百科质量的调查;3)探索维基百科在教育中的实用性;4)展示维基百科在研究中的实用性的研究。
文献将维基百科定位为公众、患者、学生和从业者在各种背景下在线获取健康信息的重要资源。维基百科的健康内容经常被访问,其页面在谷歌搜索结果中经常排名很高。虽然维基百科本身已经进入第二个十年,但在健康背景下围绕维基百科的学术讨论仍然很年轻,当试图理解维基百科作为健康信息资源时,学术文献是有限的。将讨论未来的研究可能性。