American Physical Society, Ridge, NY 11961;
David Rittenhouse Laboratories, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 10;117(10):5144-5151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903666117. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
Some bacteria and archaea possess an immune system, based on the CRISPR-Cas mechanism, that confers adaptive immunity against viruses. In such species, individual prokaryotes maintain cassettes of viral DNA elements called spacers as a memory of past infections. Typically, the cassettes contain several dozen expressed spacers. Given that bacteria can have very large genomes and since having more spacers should confer a better memory, it is puzzling that so little genetic space would be devoted by prokaryotes to their adaptive immune systems. Here, assuming that CRISPR functions as a long-term memory-based defense against a diverse landscape of viral species, we identify a fundamental tradeoff between the amount of immune memory and effectiveness of response to a given threat. This tradeoff implies an optimal size for the prokaryotic immune repertoire in the observational range.
一些细菌和古菌拥有基于 CRISPR-Cas 机制的免疫系统,可针对病毒提供适应性免疫。在这些物种中,单个原核生物将病毒 DNA 元件的盒称为间隔序列作为过去感染的记忆。通常,盒中包含几十个表达的间隔序列。鉴于细菌的基因组可能非常大,并且由于拥有更多的间隔序列应该可以提供更好的记忆,因此原核生物用于适应性免疫系统的遗传空间如此之小令人费解。在这里,我们假设 CRISPR 作为一种基于长期记忆的防御机制,针对多样化的病毒物种发挥作用,从而确定了免疫记忆量与针对特定威胁的反应有效性之间的基本权衡。这种权衡意味着原核生物免疫库在观测范围内具有最佳的大小。