• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在使用带放回的倾向得分匹配法处理生存或事件发生时间结局时的方差估计。

Variance estimation when using propensity-score matching with replacement with survival or time-to-event outcomes.

作者信息

Austin Peter C, Cafri Guy

机构信息

ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Institute of Health Management, Policy and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2020 May 20;39(11):1623-1640. doi: 10.1002/sim.8502. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1002/sim.8502
PMID:32109319
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7217182/
Abstract

Propensity-score matching is a popular analytic method to estimate the effects of treatments when using observational data. Matching on the propensity score typically requires a pool of potential controls that is larger than the number of treated or exposed subjects. The most common approach to matching on the propensity score is matching without replacement, in which each control subject is matched to at most one treated subject. Failure to find a matched control for each treated subject can lead to "bias due to incomplete matching." To avoid this bias, it is important to identify a matched control subject for each treated subject. An alternative to matching without replacement is matching with replacement, in which control subjects are allowed to be matched to multiple treated subjects. A limitation to the use of matching with replacement is that variance estimation must account for both the matched nature of the sample and for some control subjects being included in multiple matched sets. While a variance estimator has been proposed for when outcomes are continuous, no such estimator has been proposed for use with time-to-event outcomes, which are common in medical and epidemiological research. We propose a variance estimator for the hazard ratio when matching with replacement. We conducted a series of Monte Carlo simulations to examine the performance of this estimator. We illustrate the utility of matching with replacement to estimate the effect of smoking cessation counseling on survival in smokers discharged from hospital with a heart attack.

摘要

倾向得分匹配是一种在使用观察性数据时估计治疗效果的常用分析方法。基于倾向得分进行匹配通常需要一组潜在对照,其数量要多于接受治疗或暴露的受试者数量。基于倾向得分进行匹配最常见的方法是无放回匹配,即每个对照受试者最多与一个接受治疗的受试者匹配。未能为每个接受治疗的受试者找到匹配的对照可能会导致“因不完全匹配而产生的偏差”。为避免这种偏差,为每个接受治疗的受试者确定一个匹配的对照受试者很重要。无放回匹配的一种替代方法是有放回匹配,即允许对照受试者与多个接受治疗的受试者匹配。有放回匹配使用的一个限制是方差估计必须同时考虑样本的匹配性质以及一些对照受试者被纳入多个匹配组的情况。虽然已经针对连续结局提出了一种方差估计器,但对于医学和流行病学研究中常见的事件发生时间结局,尚未提出这样的估计器。我们提出了一种用于有放回匹配时风险比的方差估计器。我们进行了一系列蒙特卡罗模拟来检验该估计器的性能。我们举例说明了有放回匹配在估计戒烟咨询对因心脏病发作出院的吸烟者生存影响方面的效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/44a7c02b03cb/SIM-39-1623-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/7b1e5dfac8cc/SIM-39-1623-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/b00af3348480/SIM-39-1623-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/fda8391c90c8/SIM-39-1623-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/7140d37847f1/SIM-39-1623-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/d2896f6cb61f/SIM-39-1623-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/0a3678644e6a/SIM-39-1623-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/e0f584211329/SIM-39-1623-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/c8a85954723a/SIM-39-1623-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/0a881dbf7083/SIM-39-1623-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/c2807a4571bf/SIM-39-1623-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/0328767506ff/SIM-39-1623-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/669ac5a66bb7/SIM-39-1623-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/44a7c02b03cb/SIM-39-1623-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/7b1e5dfac8cc/SIM-39-1623-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/b00af3348480/SIM-39-1623-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/fda8391c90c8/SIM-39-1623-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/7140d37847f1/SIM-39-1623-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/d2896f6cb61f/SIM-39-1623-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/0a3678644e6a/SIM-39-1623-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/e0f584211329/SIM-39-1623-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/c8a85954723a/SIM-39-1623-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/0a881dbf7083/SIM-39-1623-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/c2807a4571bf/SIM-39-1623-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/0328767506ff/SIM-39-1623-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/669ac5a66bb7/SIM-39-1623-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cacb/7217182/44a7c02b03cb/SIM-39-1623-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
Variance estimation when using propensity-score matching with replacement with survival or time-to-event outcomes.在使用带放回的倾向得分匹配法处理生存或事件发生时间结局时的方差估计。
Stat Med. 2020 May 20;39(11):1623-1640. doi: 10.1002/sim.8502. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
2
Covariate-adjusted survival analyses in propensity-score matched samples: Imputing potential time-to-event outcomes.倾向得分匹配样本中的协变量调整生存分析:估算潜在的事件发生时间结局。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):728-751. doi: 10.1177/0962280218817926. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
3
Optimal full matching for survival outcomes: a method that merits more widespread use.生存结局的最优完全匹配:一种值得更广泛应用的方法。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 30;34(30):3949-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.6602. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
4
Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses.倾向得分匹配分析中的I型错误率、置信区间覆盖范围和方差估计
Int J Biostat. 2009 Apr 14;5(1):Article 13. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1146.
5
Propensity-score matching with competing risks in survival analysis.生存分析中存在竞争风险的倾向评分匹配。
Stat Med. 2019 Feb 28;38(5):751-777. doi: 10.1002/sim.8008. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Propensity score applied to survival data analysis through proportional hazards models: a Monte Carlo study.通过比例风险模型将倾向得分应用于生存数据分析:一项蒙特卡洛研究。
Pharm Stat. 2012 May-Jun;11(3):222-9. doi: 10.1002/pst.537. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
7
Oversampling and replacement strategies in propensity score matching: a critical review focused on small sample size in clinical settings.倾向评分匹配中的过采样和替换策略:侧重于临床环境中小样本量的批判性回顾。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 22;21(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01454-z.
8
The effect of a constraint on the maximum number of controls matched to each treated subject on the performance of full matching on the propensity score when estimating risk differences.在使用倾向得分进行风险差异估计时,约束对每个处理对象匹配的最大控制数的影响。
Stat Med. 2021 Jan 15;40(1):101-118. doi: 10.1002/sim.8764. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
9
Double propensity-score adjustment: A solution to design bias or bias due to incomplete matching.双重倾向评分调整:设计偏倚或不完全匹配导致的偏倚的一种解决方案。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Feb;26(1):201-222. doi: 10.1177/0962280214543508. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
10
The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.在估计治疗对生存结局的影响时,存在模型误设情况下治疗权重逆概率法和倾向得分完全匹配法的表现。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Aug;26(4):1654-1670. doi: 10.1177/0962280215584401. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Early and Delayed Treatment With Remdesivir on Mortality in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19.瑞德西韦早期和延迟治疗对COVID-19住院患者死亡率的影响。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 27;12(2):ofae740. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae740. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Propensity Score Matching: should we use it in designing observational studies?倾向得分匹配:我们应该在设计观察性研究时使用它吗?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jan 29;25(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02481-w.
3
Comparison of mitral valve repair vs. replacement for mitral valve regurgitation.

本文引用的文献

1
Covariate-adjusted survival analyses in propensity-score matched samples: Imputing potential time-to-event outcomes.倾向得分匹配样本中的协变量调整生存分析:估算潜在的事件发生时间结局。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):728-751. doi: 10.1177/0962280218817926. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
2
Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis.在生存分析中使用治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)时的方差估计。
Stat Med. 2016 Dec 30;35(30):5642-5655. doi: 10.1002/sim.7084. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
3
Optimal full matching for survival outcomes: a method that merits more widespread use.
二尖瓣反流的二尖瓣修复术与置换术的比较。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2025 Aug 11;11(5):587-603. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae108.
4
A comparison of time-varying propensity score vs sequential stratification approaches to longitudinal matching with a time-varying treatment.比较时变倾向评分与序贯分层方法在时变治疗下的纵向匹配。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02391-3.
5
Real-world evidence of survival benefit of remdesivir: study of 419 propensity score-matched patients hospitalized over the alpha and delta waves of COVID-19 in New Orleans, LA.瑞德西韦生存获益的真实世界证据:对路易斯安那州新奥尔良市419例在新冠疫情阿尔法和德尔塔波期间住院的倾向评分匹配患者的研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 16;11:1390164. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1390164. eCollection 2024.
6
Propensity score matching for estimating a marginal hazard ratio.倾向评分匹配法估计边缘风险比。
Stat Med. 2024 Jun 30;43(14):2783-2810. doi: 10.1002/sim.10103. Epub 2024 May 5.
7
Interpersonal violent injury and subsequent risk of suicide and deliberate self-harm: a register-based national cohort study from Norway, 2010-2018.人际暴力伤害与随后的自杀和故意自伤风险:一项基于挪威2010 - 2018年登记数据的全国队列研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Feb 1;68:102442. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102442. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Comparing quality indicator rates for home care clients receiving palliative and end-of-life care before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.比较新冠疫情前后居家护理临终关怀客户的质量指标率。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 5;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01336-9.
9
How to perform prespecified subgroup analyses when using propensity score methods in the case of imbalanced subgroups.如何在亚组不平衡的情况下使用倾向评分方法进行预设的亚组分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 31;23(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02071-8.
10
Economic evaluation of a multimorbidity patient centered care model implemented in the Chilean public health system.在智利公共卫生系统中实施的一种以多病种患者为中心的护理模式的经济评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 29;23(1):1041. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09970-y.
生存结局的最优完全匹配:一种值得更广泛应用的方法。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 30;34(30):3949-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.6602. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
4
The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.在估计治疗对生存结局的影响时,存在模型误设情况下治疗权重逆概率法和倾向得分完全匹配法的表现。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Aug;26(4):1654-1670. doi: 10.1177/0962280215584401. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
5
The use of bootstrapping when using propensity-score matching without replacement: a simulation study.在无放回倾向得分匹配时使用自助法:一项模拟研究。
Stat Med. 2014 Oct 30;33(24):4306-19. doi: 10.1002/sim.6276. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
6
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating absolute effects of treatments on survival outcomes: A simulation study.不同倾向评分方法在估计治疗对生存结局的绝对效应方面的表现:一项模拟研究。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Oct;25(5):2214-2237. doi: 10.1177/0962280213519716. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
7
A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score.匹配倾向评分的 12 种算法比较。
Stat Med. 2014 Mar 15;33(6):1057-69. doi: 10.1002/sim.6004. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
8
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.不同倾向评分方法估计边缘风险比的性能。
Stat Med. 2013 Jul 20;32(16):2837-49. doi: 10.1002/sim.5705. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
9
Propensity score applied to survival data analysis through proportional hazards models: a Monte Carlo study.通过比例风险模型将倾向得分应用于生存数据分析:一项蒙特卡洛研究。
Pharm Stat. 2012 May-Jun;11(3):222-9. doi: 10.1002/pst.537. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
10
A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on Mortality.倾向得分分析教程与案例研究:应用于估计住院戒烟咨询对死亡率的影响
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(1):119-151. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.540480.