• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倾向得分匹配样本中的协变量调整生存分析:估算潜在的事件发生时间结局。

Covariate-adjusted survival analyses in propensity-score matched samples: Imputing potential time-to-event outcomes.

作者信息

Austin Peter C, Thomas Neal, Rubin Donald B

机构信息

ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Institute of Health Management, Policy and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):728-751. doi: 10.1177/0962280218817926. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1177/0962280218817926
PMID:30569832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7082895/
Abstract

Matching on an estimated propensity score is frequently used to estimate the effects of treatments from observational data. Since the 1970s, different authors have proposed methods to combine matching at the design stage with regression adjustment at the analysis stage when estimating treatment effects for continuous outcomes. Previous work has consistently shown that the combination has generally superior statistical properties than either method by itself. In biomedical and epidemiological research, survival or time-to-event outcomes are common. We propose a method to combine regression adjustment and propensity score matching to estimate survival curves and hazard ratios based on estimating an imputed potential outcome under control for each successfully matched treated subject, which is accomplished using either an accelerated failure time parametric survival model or a Cox proportional hazard model that is fit to the matched control subjects. That is, a fitted model is then applied to the matched treated subjects to allow simulation of the missing potential outcome under control for each treated subject. Conventional survival analyses (e.g., estimation of survival curves and hazard ratios) can then be conducted using the observed outcome under treatment and the imputed outcome under control. We evaluated the repeated-sampling bias of the proposed methods using simulations. When using nearest neighbor matching, the proposed method resulted in decreased bias compared to crude analyses in the matched sample. We illustrate the method in an example prescribing beta-blockers at hospital discharge to patients hospitalized with heart failure.

摘要

基于估计的倾向得分进行匹配常用于从观察性数据中估计治疗效果。自20世纪70年代以来,不同的作者提出了在估计连续结果的治疗效果时,将设计阶段的匹配与分析阶段的回归调整相结合的方法。先前的研究一致表明,这种组合通常具有比单独使用任何一种方法更好的统计特性。在生物医学和流行病学研究中,生存或事件发生时间的结果很常见。我们提出了一种将回归调整和倾向得分匹配相结合的方法,基于为每个成功匹配的治疗对象估计一个在对照下的插补潜在结果来估计生存曲线和风险比,这可以使用加速失效时间参数生存模型或拟合匹配对照对象的Cox比例风险模型来实现。也就是说,然后将一个拟合模型应用于匹配的治疗对象,以允许模拟每个治疗对象在对照下缺失的潜在结果。然后可以使用治疗下的观察结果和对照下的插补结果进行传统的生存分析(例如,生存曲线和风险比的估计)。我们使用模拟评估了所提出方法的重复抽样偏差。当使用最近邻匹配时,与匹配样本中的粗略分析相比,所提出的方法导致偏差减小。我们在一个向因心力衰竭住院的患者出院时开具β受体阻滞剂的例子中说明了该方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fa/7082895/319e4a48c018/10.1177_0962280218817926-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fa/7082895/a2fa087372da/10.1177_0962280218817926-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fa/7082895/8a7fd8edadf1/10.1177_0962280218817926-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fa/7082895/e9149fcb74e5/10.1177_0962280218817926-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fa/7082895/2258832eeead/10.1177_0962280218817926-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fa/7082895/3a9ec99bd0d2/10.1177_0962280218817926-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fa/7082895/319e4a48c018/10.1177_0962280218817926-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fa/7082895/a2fa087372da/10.1177_0962280218817926-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fa/7082895/8a7fd8edadf1/10.1177_0962280218817926-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fa/7082895/e9149fcb74e5/10.1177_0962280218817926-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fa/7082895/2258832eeead/10.1177_0962280218817926-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fa/7082895/3a9ec99bd0d2/10.1177_0962280218817926-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fa/7082895/319e4a48c018/10.1177_0962280218817926-fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Covariate-adjusted survival analyses in propensity-score matched samples: Imputing potential time-to-event outcomes.倾向得分匹配样本中的协变量调整生存分析:估算潜在的事件发生时间结局。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):728-751. doi: 10.1177/0962280218817926. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
2
Estimating adjusted risk differences by multiply-imputing missing control binary potential outcomes following propensity score-matching.采用倾向评分匹配后多重插补缺失的对照二分类潜在结局估计调整风险差异。
Stat Med. 2021 Nov 10;40(25):5565-5586. doi: 10.1002/sim.9141. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Optimal full matching for survival outcomes: a method that merits more widespread use.生存结局的最优完全匹配:一种值得更广泛应用的方法。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 30;34(30):3949-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.6602. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
4
Variance estimation when using propensity-score matching with replacement with survival or time-to-event outcomes.在使用带放回的倾向得分匹配法处理生存或事件发生时间结局时的方差估计。
Stat Med. 2020 May 20;39(11):1623-1640. doi: 10.1002/sim.8502. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
5
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.不同倾向评分方法估计边缘风险比的性能。
Stat Med. 2013 Jul 20;32(16):2837-49. doi: 10.1002/sim.5705. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
6
Double propensity-score adjustment: A solution to design bias or bias due to incomplete matching.双重倾向评分调整:设计偏倚或不完全匹配导致的偏倚的一种解决方案。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Feb;26(1):201-222. doi: 10.1177/0962280214543508. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
7
Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses.倾向得分匹配分析中的I型错误率、置信区间覆盖范围和方差估计
Int J Biostat. 2009 Apr 14;5(1):Article 13. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1146.
8
The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.在估计治疗对生存结局的影响时,存在模型误设情况下治疗权重逆概率法和倾向得分完全匹配法的表现。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Aug;26(4):1654-1670. doi: 10.1177/0962280215584401. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
9
Minimizing confounding in comparative observational studies with time-to-event outcomes: An extensive comparison of covariate balancing methods using Monte Carlo simulation.最小化时间至事件结局的比较性观察研究中的混杂因素:使用蒙特卡罗模拟对协变量平衡方法进行广泛比较。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Aug;33(8):1437-1460. doi: 10.1177/09622802241262527. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
10
Propensity-score matching with competing risks in survival analysis.生存分析中存在竞争风险的倾向评分匹配。
Stat Med. 2019 Feb 28;38(5):751-777. doi: 10.1002/sim.8008. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
1-year survival in critically ill elderly medical patients treated with a conservative or an invasive approach (OCTO-REVERSE study): a nationwide observational study.采用保守或侵入性方法治疗的老年重症内科患者的1年生存率(OCTO-REVERSE研究):一项全国性观察性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 May 22;15(5):e089835. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089835.
2
Matching plus regression adjustment for the estimation of the average treatment effect on survival outcomes: a case study with mosunetuzumab in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.用于估计生存结局平均治疗效果的匹配加回归调整:以莫苏奈妥珠单抗治疗复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤为例
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 1;25(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02456-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The treatment of missing data in a large cardiovascular clinical outcomes study.一项大型心血管临床结局研究中缺失数据的处理
Clin Trials. 2016 Jun;13(3):344-51. doi: 10.1177/1740774515626411. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
2
Optimal full matching for survival outcomes: a method that merits more widespread use.生存结局的最优完全匹配:一种值得更广泛应用的方法。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 30;34(30):3949-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.6602. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
3
The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
Combined radiation and chemotherapy versus monotherapy for anaplastic thyroid cancer: A SEER retrospective analysis.
联合放疗与化疗对比单药治疗间变性甲状腺癌:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)回顾性分析
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 5;10(13):e34168. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34168. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
4
Pancreatic mucinous adenocarcinoma has different clinical characteristics and better prognosis compared to non-specific PDAC: A retrospective observational study.胰腺黏液腺癌与非特异性胰腺导管腺癌相比具有不同的临床特征和更好的预后:一项回顾性观察研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 26;10(9):e30268. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30268. eCollection 2024 May 15.
5
Competing risk multistate censored data modeling by propensity score matching method.采用倾向评分匹配法对竞争风险多状态删失数据进行建模。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 22;14(1):4368. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54149-y.
6
Embolization of De Novo Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations Using High-Volume Detachable Non-Fibered Coils: Propensity-Matched Comparison to Traditional Coils.使用大容量可脱卸无纤维线圈栓塞初发性肺动静脉畸形:与传统线圈的倾向匹配比较
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 23;13(3):648. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030648.
7
Post-hospitalization remote monitoring for patients with heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in an accountable care organization.在责任医疗组织中对心力衰竭或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行院后远程监测。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 13;24(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10496-6.
8
High-throughput target trial emulation for Alzheimer's disease drug repurposing with real-world data.基于真实世界数据的阿尔茨海默病药物再利用的高通量目标试验模拟。
Nat Commun. 2023 Dec 11;14(1):8180. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43929-1.
9
Factors Associated With Survival Disparities Between Non-Hispanic Black and White Patients With Uterine Cancer.与非裔美国人和白人女性子宫癌患者生存差异相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238437. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8437.
10
Commentary: Stentless valve for bicuspid aortic valve replacement: Some answers just lead to more questions.评论:用于二尖瓣主动脉瓣置换的无支架瓣膜:有些答案只会引发更多问题。
JTCVS Open. 2021 Nov 6;8:191-192. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.11.005. eCollection 2021 Dec.
在估计治疗对生存结局的影响时,存在模型误设情况下治疗权重逆概率法和倾向得分完全匹配法的表现。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Aug;26(4):1654-1670. doi: 10.1177/0962280215584401. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
4
Double propensity-score adjustment: A solution to design bias or bias due to incomplete matching.双重倾向评分调整:设计偏倚或不完全匹配导致的偏倚的一种解决方案。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Feb;26(1):201-222. doi: 10.1177/0962280214543508. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
5
A multiple imputation method for sensitivity analyses of time-to-event data with possibly informative censoring.一种用于对可能存在信息删失的事件发生时间数据进行敏感性分析的多重填补方法。
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(2):229-53. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2013.860769.
6
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating absolute effects of treatments on survival outcomes: A simulation study.不同倾向评分方法在估计治疗对生存结局的绝对效应方面的表现:一项模拟研究。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Oct;25(5):2214-2237. doi: 10.1177/0962280213519716. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
7
A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score.匹配倾向评分的 12 种算法比较。
Stat Med. 2014 Mar 15;33(6):1057-69. doi: 10.1002/sim.6004. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
8
The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments.倾向评分方法在生存或事件发生时间结局中的应用:报告与随机试验中使用的效应测量指标相似的指标。
Stat Med. 2014 Mar 30;33(7):1242-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.5984. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
9
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.不同倾向评分方法估计边缘风险比的性能。
Stat Med. 2013 Jul 20;32(16):2837-49. doi: 10.1002/sim.5705. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
10
Robust estimation of causal effects of binary treatments in unconfounded studies with dichotomous outcomes.在无混杂研究中具有二分类结局的二项处理因果效应的稳健估计。
Stat Med. 2013 May 20;32(11):1795-814. doi: 10.1002/sim.5627. Epub 2012 Sep 28.