• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证德克萨斯州莱克城健康社区设计综合规划评分系统。

Validating a comprehensive plan scoring system for healthy community design in League City, Texas.

作者信息

Horney Jennifer A, Dwyer Caroline, Vendrell-Velez Bea, Newman Galen

机构信息

Epidemiology, University of Delaware College of Health Sciences, Newark, DE, USA.

Renaissance Planning Group, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Urban Des (Abingdon). 2020;25(2):203-217. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2019.1572453. Epub 2019 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1080/13574809.2019.1572453
PMID:32132860
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7055687/
Abstract

Comprehensive plans provide an overall vision for a city's land use and development and influence community health conditions. As part of a community-engaged research project, a Healthy Living and Active Design Scorecard was applied to the comprehensive plan of League City, Texas, to identify health-promoting design and planning strategies. Although the plan scored similarly to published examples, several areas of improvement aligned with priorities from a community health assessment were identified, including improving public transportation and access to exercise and recreation. Future revisions of the plans and neighbourhood scaled designs targeting these issues could improve the health of the community.

摘要

综合规划为城市的土地利用和发展提供了总体愿景,并影响社区健康状况。作为一项社区参与研究项目的一部分,一份《健康生活与积极设计计分卡》被应用于得克萨斯州莱克城的综合规划,以确定促进健康的设计和规划策略。尽管该规划的得分与已发表的案例类似,但仍确定了几个与社区健康评估优先事项一致的改进领域,包括改善公共交通以及增加锻炼和娱乐设施的可及性。针对这些问题对规划和社区规模设计进行未来修订,可能会改善社区的健康状况。

相似文献

1
Validating a comprehensive plan scoring system for healthy community design in League City, Texas.验证德克萨斯州莱克城健康社区设计综合规划评分系统。
J Urban Des (Abingdon). 2020;25(2):203-217. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2019.1572453. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
2
A comprehensive scoring system to measure healthy community design in land use plans and regulations.
Prev Med. 2017 Feb;95 Suppl:S141-S147. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.031. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
3
Urban planning and public health at CDC.美国疾病控制与预防中心的城市规划与公共卫生
MMWR Suppl. 2006 Dec 22;55(2):34-8.
4
Partnership moves community toward complete streets.合作推动社区迈向完整街道。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6 Suppl 2):S420-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.009.
5
Prevalence of master plans supportive of active living in US municipalities.支持积极生活的美国市政总规划的流行度。
Prev Med. 2018 Oct;115:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
6
Local Health Department Engagement in Community Physical Activity Policy.地方卫生部门参与社区体育活动政策制定
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jan;50(1):57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.033. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
7
Promoting active community environments through land use and transportation planning.通过土地利用和交通规划促进积极的社区环境。
Am J Health Promot. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(4 Suppl):397-407. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.397.
8
Supporting Active Living Through Community Plans: The Association of Planning Documents With Design Standards and Features.通过社区规划支持积极生活:规划文件与设计标准和特征的关联。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Feb;33(2):191-198. doi: 10.1177/0890117118779011. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
9
Get Active Orlando: changing the built environment to increase physical activity.奥兰多活力行动:改变建筑环境以增加身体活动。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6 Suppl 2):S395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.013.
10
Community and multisector partner engagement in US Vision Zero plan development.社区及多部门合作伙伴参与美国零愿景计划的制定。
Inj Prev. 2025 Jan 23;31(1):60-65. doi: 10.1136/ip-2023-045148.

引用本文的文献

1
Inclusive and intersectoral: community health improvement planning opportunities to advance the social determinants of health and health equity.包容和跨部门的:社区卫生改善规划机会,以推进健康的社会决定因素和健康公平。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 13;24(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17496-5.
2
Subtypes of Park Use and Self-Reported Psychological Benefits Among Older Adults: A Multilevel Latent Class Analysis Approach.老年人公园使用的亚型与自我报告的心理益处:一种多层次潜在类别分析方法。
Landsc Urban Plan. 2019 Oct;190. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103605. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

1
A comprehensive scoring system to measure healthy community design in land use plans and regulations.
Prev Med. 2017 Feb;95 Suppl:S141-S147. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.031. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
2
The impact of green stormwater infrastructure installation on surrounding health and safety.绿色雨水基础设施安装对周边健康与安全的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105(3):e114-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302314. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis of reduction in all-cause mortality from walking and cycling and shape of dose response relationship.步行和骑行对全因死亡率降低的系统评价及剂量反应关系形态的荟萃分析
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Oct 24;11:132. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0132-x.
4
What are the health benefits of active travel? A systematic review of trials and cohort studies.积极出行的健康益处有哪些?试验和队列研究的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 15;8(8):e69912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069912. eCollection 2013.
5
Role of physical activity in the relationship between urban green space and health.体力活动在城市绿地与健康关系中的作用。
Public Health. 2013 Apr;127(4):318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
6
Does distance decay modelling of supermarket accessibility predict fruit and vegetable intake by individuals in a large metropolitan area?超市可达性的距离衰减模型能否预测大城市地区个人的果蔬摄入量?
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013 Feb;24(1 Suppl):172-85. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0049.
7
The relationship between built environments and physical activity: a systematic review.建筑环境与身体活动之间的关系:系统评价。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Oct;102(10):e7-e13. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300740. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
8
The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence.城市绿地的健康益处:证据回顾。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2011 Jun;33(2):212-22. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdq068. Epub 2010 Sep 10.
9
The Epidemiologic Transition: Changing Patterns of Mortality and Population Dynamics.流行病学转变:死亡率和人口动态的变化模式
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2009 Jul 1;3(1 Suppl):19S-26S. doi: 10.1177/1559827609335350.
10
A systematic review of built environment and health.系统综述:建筑环境与健康。
Fam Community Health. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):68-78. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3181c4e2e5.