Furber Matthew James Walter, Roberts Justin Dene, Roberts Michael George
1Department of Sport, University of Hertfordshire, School of Life & Medical Sciences, Health & Exercise Science, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB UK.
2Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Cambridge, CB1 1PT UK.
BMC Nutr. 2017 Apr 12;3:36. doi: 10.1186/s40795-017-0156-0. eCollection 2017.
Establishing an understanding of an athlete's nutrition knowledge can inform the coach/practitioner and support the development of the athlete. Thus the purpose of the study was to develop a psychometrically valid and reliable tool to assess general and sport nutrition knowledge.
An 85 question questionnaire was developed in consultation with a panel of experts. Ninety-eight participants from the UK completed the questionnaire, and again 3 weeks later. The participants were classified into two groups: those with nutrition (NUT, = 53) training (sport nutritionists and dietitians who were either practicing or undertaking a postgraduate qualification in the field), and those without (NONUT, = 48) training (professionals and postgraduate students with no exposure to any form of nutrition training). The questionnaire was then administered to a pilot cohort of UK based track and field athletes ( = 59) who were requested to time how long it took to complete the questionnaire.
Psychometric statistical analysis of the results was completed, resulting in the removal of 23 questions for a total of 62 questions in the final questionnaire. The validated questionnaire was then administered to 58 track and field athletes. Internal consistency was assessed using Chronbach's alpha (α > 0.7), Pearson's correlation ( < 0.05) was used to assess reliability. Construct validity was evaluated using a -test ( < 0.05). A total test retest correlation of 0.95 was achieved (sub-section range: 0.87-0.97). Internal consistency was accepted in each sub-section (α = 0.78-0.92) and the nutrition-trained group scored significantly higher on the overall questionnaire (80.4 vs 49.6%). The overall score for the athletic group was 61.0%.
The questionnaire satisfied all psychometric measures and provides a new valid and reliable tool to assess general and sport nutrition knowledge of track and field athlete.
了解运动员的营养知识可以为教练/从业者提供信息,并支持运动员的发展。因此,本研究的目的是开发一种心理测量学上有效且可靠的工具,以评估一般和运动营养知识。
与专家小组协商后编制了一份包含85个问题的问卷。98名来自英国的参与者完成了问卷,并在3周后再次填写。参与者被分为两组:接受过营养培训的(NUT,n = 53)(从事该领域工作或正在攻读该领域研究生资格的运动营养学家和营养师),以及未接受过培训的(NONUT,n = 48)(未接触过任何形式营养培训的专业人员和研究生)。然后,该问卷被发放给一组以英国为基地的田径运动员试点群体(n = 59),他们被要求记录完成问卷所需的时间。
完成了对结果的心理测量统计分析,最终问卷共删除了23个问题,剩下62个问题。然后,经过验证的问卷被发放给58名田径运动员。使用克朗巴赫α系数(α>0.7)评估内部一致性,使用皮尔逊相关系数(<0.05)评估信度。使用t检验(<0.05)评估结构效度。重测总相关系数达到0.95(各子部分范围:0.87 - 0.97)。每个子部分的内部一致性均被接受(α = 0.78 - 0.92),接受过营养培训的组在总体问卷上的得分显著更高(80.4%对49.6%)。运动员组的总体得分是61.0%。
该问卷满足所有心理测量指标,为评估田径运动员的一般和运动营养知识提供了一种新的有效且可靠的工具。