Suppr超能文献

育儿科学团队:由幼儿家长主导的研究项目的激进共创。

Parenting Science Gang: radical co-creation of research projects led by parents of young children.

作者信息

Collins Sophia, Brueton Rebecca, Graham Tamasin Greenough, Organ Stephanie, Strother Amy, West Sarah Elizabeth, McKendree Jean

机构信息

Lauder, UK.

Eastbourne, UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Mar 2;6:9. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-0181-z. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parents are increasingly searching online for information supported by research but can find it difficult to identify results relevant to their own experiences. More troublingly, a number of studies indicate that parenting information found online often can be misleading or wrong. The goal of the Parenting Science Gang (PSG) project was to use the power of the Internet to help parents ask questions they wanted to have answered by scientific research and to feel confident in assessing research evidence.

METHODS

By using Facebook to recruit groups and facilitate interactions, PSG was able to engage fully the target public of parents of young children in the radical co-production of scientific studies, while not creating an undue burden on time or restricting participants due to disability, financial status or location. By giving parents true partnership and control of creation of projects, PSG ensured that the chosen questions were ones that were of most relevance and interest to them.

RESULTS

This paper presents a summary of eight projects, with three in more detail, designed and implemented by PSG Facebook groups in collaboration with experts. Most projects had health related themes, often prompted by dissatisfaction with treatment of parents by health professionals or by feelings of being marginalised by pregnancy and motherhood, as well as by the lack of evidence for their questions and concerns. The PSG approach meant that these frustrations were channelled into actions. All eight of the PSG groups engaged in meaningful interactions with experts and co-produced studies with the groups defining the questions of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

This radically user-led design meant that the PSG staff and the collaborating experts had to live with a high degree of uncertainty. Nevertheless, PSG achieved its goal of academically productive, truly co-produced projects, but as important were the positive effects it had on many of the participants, both parents and experts. At the point of writing this paper, PSG projects have led to outputs including at least eight papers published, in press or in preparation, seven conference presentations, testimony to the Infant Feeding All-Party Parliamentary Group, and with more to come.

摘要

背景

家长们越来越多地在网上搜索有研究依据的信息,但发现很难找到与自身经历相关的结果。更麻烦的是,一些研究表明,网上找到的育儿信息往往具有误导性或错误。育儿科学团队(PSG)项目的目标是利用互联网的力量,帮助家长提出他们希望通过科学研究得到解答的问题,并让他们有信心评估研究证据。

方法

通过利用脸书招募群组并促进互动,PSG能够让幼儿家长这一目标群体充分参与科学研究的深度共同制作,同时不会给他们造成过度的时间负担,也不会因残疾、经济状况或地理位置而限制参与者。通过给予家长真正的合作伙伴关系以及对项目创建的控制权,PSG确保所选择的问题是对他们最相关且最感兴趣的问题。

结果

本文概述了由PSG脸书群组与专家合作设计并实施的八个项目,其中三个项目有更详细的介绍。大多数项目都有与健康相关的主题,这些主题往往是由于家长对医疗专业人员的治疗不满、因怀孕和为人母而感到被边缘化,以及他们的问题和担忧缺乏证据而引发的。PSG的方法意味着这些挫折被转化为行动。所有八个PSG群组都与专家进行了有意义的互动,并与定义感兴趣问题的群组共同制作了研究。

结论

这种完全由用户主导的设计意味着PSG工作人员和合作专家不得不面对高度的不确定性。尽管如此,PSG实现了其在学术上富有成效、真正共同制作项目的目标,但同样重要的是它对许多参与者(包括家长和专家)产生的积极影响。在撰写本文时,PSG项目已产生的成果包括至少八篇已发表、正在审核或正在撰写的论文、七次会议报告、向婴儿喂养全党派议会小组提供的证词,而且还有更多成果即将推出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45a9/7053073/a9365572c5e3/40900_2020_181_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验