Khaneshi Raha, Rasooli Sousan, Moslemi Farnaz, Fakour Sanam
Department of Anesthesiology, Alzahra Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Alzahra Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
J Reprod Infertil. 2020 Jan-Mar;21(1):42-48.
To diminish labor pain, several techniques have been used in developed countries. In the current randomized controlled trial, the use of epidural analgesia via PCEA pump with and without background infusion of analgesic was studied.
In this double-blinded controlled trial, 60 women were enrolled and randomly assigned to study groups for receiving epidural analgesia during labor. All patients received initial bullous dose including 125 bupivacaine and 3 fentanyl, and the first group patient (CI) received background infusion of 8 and the second group (PCEA) received 10 bullous dose of 125 bupivacaine combined with 100 fentanyl (2 ) via epidural catheter. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 0-10 was measured 20 after drug injection. The chi-square and student T-test were used for comparing variables between groups, and 0.05 was considered as the level of significance.
There was no significant difference in terms of demographic variables. Mean duration of the second stage of labor was significantly lower in patients received continuous infusion (CI) (p<0.0001). However, the total administered fentanyl dose was significantly higher in patients who underwent PCEA (p<0.0001). Besides, the CI group had a significantly lower rate of patient-controlled injection compared to PCEA patients (p<0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between patients' satisfaction and VAS in study groups.
Epidural analgesia using PCEA combined with continuous infusion did not provide higher analgesia or patients' satisfaction compared to PCEA alone; however, it led to a decreased rate of drug injection and total administered dosage.
在发达国家,为减轻分娩疼痛已采用了多种技术。在当前的随机对照试验中,研究了使用经皮连续硬膜外镇痛泵(PCEA)且有或无背景镇痛输注的情况。
在这项双盲对照试验中,招募了60名妇女并将她们随机分配到研究组,以便在分娩期间接受硬膜外镇痛。所有患者均接受初始大剂量注射,包括125毫克布比卡因和3微克芬太尼,第一组患者(CI)接受8微克的背景输注,第二组(PCEA)通过硬膜外导管接受10次大剂量的125毫克布比卡因与100微克芬太尼(2微克/次)联合注射。在注射药物20分钟后测量0至10的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。采用卡方检验和学生t检验比较组间变量,以0.05作为显著性水平。
在人口统计学变量方面无显著差异。接受持续输注(CI)的患者第二产程的平均持续时间显著缩短(p<0.0001)。然而,接受PCEA的患者芬太尼总给药剂量显著更高(p<0.0001)。此外,与PCEA患者相比,CI组患者自控注射率显著更低(p<0.0001)。然而,研究组患者的满意度和VAS之间无显著差异。
与单独使用PCEA相比,PCEA联合持续输注的硬膜外镇痛并未提供更高的镇痛效果或患者满意度;然而,它导致了药物注射率和总给药剂量的降低。