• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析与道路安全相关的驾驶员行为标准在不同驾驶文化中的重要性。

Analyzing the Importance of Driver Behavior Criteria Related to Road Safety for Different Driving Cultures.

机构信息

Department of Transport Technology and Economics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1111 Budapest, Hungary.

Department of Civil Engineering, Comsats University Islamabad, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 14;17(6):1893. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061893.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17061893
PMID:32183323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7143796/
Abstract

Driver behavior has been considered as the most critical and uncertain criteria in the study of traffic safety issues. Driver behavior identification and categorization by using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) can overcome the uncertainty of driver behavior by capturing the ambiguity of driver thinking style. The main goal of this paper is to examine the significant driver behavior criteria that influence traffic safety for different traffic cultures such as Hungary, Turkey, Pakistan and China. The study utilized the FAHP framework to compare and quantify the driver behavior criteria designed on a three-level hierarchical structure. The FAHP procedure computed the weight factors and ranked the significant driver behavior criteria based on pairwise comparisons (PCs) of driver's responses on the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ). The study results observed "violations" as the most significant driver behavior criteria for level 1 by all nominated regions except Hungary. While for level 2, "aggressive violations" is observed as the most significant driver behavior criteria by all regions except Turkey. Moreover, for level 3, Hungary and Turkey drivers evaluated the "drive with alcohol use" as the most significant driver behavior criteria. While Pakistan and China drivers evaluated the "fail to yield pedestrian" as the most significant driver behavior criteria. Finally, Kendall's agreement test was performed to measure the agreement degree between observed groups for each level in a hierarchical structure. The methodology applied can be easily transferable to other study areas and our results in this study can be helpful for the drivers of each region to focus on highlighted significant driver behavior criteria to reduce fatal and seriously injured traffic accidents.

摘要

驾驶员行为一直被认为是交通安全问题研究中最关键和最不确定的标准。通过使用模糊层次分析法(FAHP)对驾驶员行为进行识别和分类,可以通过捕捉驾驶员思维方式的模糊性来克服驾驶员行为的不确定性。本文的主要目的是研究不同交通文化(如匈牙利、土耳其、巴基斯坦和中国)中影响交通安全的显著驾驶员行为标准。该研究利用 FAHP 框架对基于三级层次结构设计的驾驶员行为标准进行了比较和量化。FAHP 程序根据驾驶员对驾驶员行为问卷(DBQ)的回答进行两两比较(PCs),计算了权重因素,并根据权重对显著驾驶员行为标准进行了排序。研究结果观察到,除了匈牙利,所有被提名的地区都将“违规”视为一级最显著的驾驶员行为标准。而对于二级,除了土耳其,所有地区都将“攻击性违规”视为最显著的驾驶员行为标准。此外,对于三级,匈牙利和土耳其的驾驶员将“酒后驾车”评估为最显著的驾驶员行为标准。而巴基斯坦和中国的驾驶员则将“不让行人”评估为最显著的驾驶员行为标准。最后,进行了 Kendall 一致性检验,以衡量层次结构中每个级别观察到的组之间的一致性程度。所应用的方法可以很容易地转移到其他研究领域,我们在这项研究中的结果可以帮助每个地区的驾驶员关注突出的显著驾驶员行为标准,以减少致命和严重的交通事故。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ca/7143796/a03dc29bdf06/ijerph-17-01893-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ca/7143796/a24e99b06b8a/ijerph-17-01893-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ca/7143796/fc7565ab36bf/ijerph-17-01893-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ca/7143796/485002723ac6/ijerph-17-01893-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ca/7143796/2b532628d2ad/ijerph-17-01893-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ca/7143796/a03dc29bdf06/ijerph-17-01893-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ca/7143796/a24e99b06b8a/ijerph-17-01893-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ca/7143796/fc7565ab36bf/ijerph-17-01893-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ca/7143796/485002723ac6/ijerph-17-01893-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ca/7143796/2b532628d2ad/ijerph-17-01893-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ca/7143796/a03dc29bdf06/ijerph-17-01893-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Analyzing the Importance of Driver Behavior Criteria Related to Road Safety for Different Driving Cultures.分析与道路安全相关的驾驶员行为标准在不同驾驶文化中的重要性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 14;17(6):1893. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061893.
2
Traffic climate and driver behaviors: The moderating role of driving skills in Turkey and China.交通气候与驾驶行为:驾驶技能在土耳其和中国的调节作用。
J Safety Res. 2020 Dec;75:87-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
3
Driving anger dimensions and their relationship with aberrant driver behavior in Lebanon: Results from a national self-reported survey.黎巴嫩的驾驶愤怒维度及其与异常驾驶行为的关系:一项全国性自我报告调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 17;18(3):e0283293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283293. eCollection 2023.
4
Road traffic accidents and self-reported Portuguese car driver's attitudes, behaviors, and opinions: Are they related?道路交通事故与葡萄牙汽车驾驶员自我报告的态度、行为和观点:它们之间有关联吗?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):705-11. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1150591. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
5
Analyzing fault and severity in pedestrian-motor vehicle accidents in China.分析中国行人-机动车事故中的故障和严重程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
6
An application of the driver behavior questionnaire to Chinese carless young drivers.驾驶员行为问卷在中国无驾龄年轻驾驶员中的应用。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(8):867-73. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.775432.
7
Analysis of factors influencing aggressive driver behavior and crash involvement.分析影响攻击性驾驶行为和碰撞事故发生的因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(sup1):S21-S26. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1965590. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
8
Attitudinal segmentaion of drivers in Pakistan: The potential for effective road safety campaigns.巴基斯坦驾驶员态度细分:有效道路安全运动的潜力。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 May;114:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
9
Assessment of Significant Factors Affecting Frequent Lane-Changing Related to Road Safety: An Integrated Approach of the AHP-BWM Model.评估影响频繁变道相关道路安全的显著因素:层次分析法-逼近理想解排序法的综合方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;18(20):10628. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010628.
10
Effects of safety measures on driver's speed behavior at pedestrian crossings.安全措施对驾驶员在行人横道处的速度行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Oct;83:111-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning a Memory-Enhanced Multi-Stage Goal-Driven Network for Egocentric Trajectory Prediction.学习用于自我中心轨迹预测的记忆增强多阶段目标驱动网络。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;9(8):462. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9080462.
2
Exploring the knowledge and practices on road safety measures among motorbikers in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.孟加拉国达卡摩托车骑行者道路安全措施知识与实践探索:一项横断面研究
Inj Prev. 2023 Nov 28. doi: 10.1136/ip-2023-045071.
3
Modelling and Mitigating Secondary Crash Risk for Serial Tunnels on Freeway via Lighting-Related Microscopic Traffic Model with Inter-Lane Dependency.

本文引用的文献

1
Drivers' visual scanning behavior at signalized and unsignalized intersections: A naturalistic driving study in China.驾驶员在信号和无信号交叉口的视觉扫描行为:中国的自然驾驶研究。
J Safety Res. 2019 Dec;71:219-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
2
The effectiveness and influencing factors of a penalty point system in China from the perspective of risky driving behaviors.从危险驾驶行为角度看中国违章扣分制度的有效性及其影响因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Oct;131:171-179. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
3
Comparing Classic and Interval Analytical Hierarchy Process Methodologies for Measuring Area-Level Deprivation to Analyze Health Inequalities.
基于具有车道间相关性的与照明相关的微观交通模型对高速公路连续隧道的二次事故风险进行建模和缓解
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(4):3066. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043066.
4
Modeling Driver Behavior in Road Traffic Simulation.道路交通模拟中的驾驶员行为建模。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 14;22(24):9801. doi: 10.3390/s22249801.
5
Entropy Method of Road Safety Management: Case Study of the Russian Federation.道路安全管理的熵方法:以俄罗斯联邦为例
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jan 25;24(2):177. doi: 10.3390/e24020177.
6
Understanding Traffic Accidents among Young Drivers in Qatar.理解卡塔尔年轻驾驶员的交通事故。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 4;19(1):514. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010514.
7
Global impact of COVID-19 pandemic on road traffic collisions.全球 COVID-19 大流行对道路交通碰撞的影响。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Sep 28;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00395-8.
8
Road Safety Perception Questionnaire (RSPQ) in Latin America: A Development and Validation Study.道路安全感知问卷(RSPQ)在拉丁美洲:一项开发和验证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 2;18(5):2433. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052433.
9
Predicting Risky and Aggressive Driving Behavior among Taxi Drivers: Do Spatio-Temporal Attributes Matter?预测出租车司机的高风险驾驶行为和侵略性驾驶行为:时空属性重要吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 2;17(11):3937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113937.
比较经典分析法和区间分析法在衡量区域贫困程度以分析健康不平等方面的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 16;15(1):140. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010140.
4
Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement.驾驶失误、交通违规及事故参与情况。
Ergonomics. 1995 May;38(5):1036-1048. doi: 10.1080/00140139508925170.
5
Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based statistical models and Remote sensing data in tropical environment.在热带环境中使用基于GIS的统计模型和遥感数据进行滑坡易发性制图。
Sci Rep. 2015 Apr 22;5:9899. doi: 10.1038/srep09899.
6
How to identify the key factors that affect driver perception of accident risk. A comparison between Italian and Spanish driver behavior.如何识别影响驾驶员感知事故风险的关键因素。意大利和西班牙驾驶员行为的比较。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:225-35. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
7
The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire as a predictor of accidents: a meta-analysis.驾驶员行为问卷在预测事故中的作用:荟萃分析。
J Safety Res. 2010 Dec;41(6):463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.10.007. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
8
Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?道路上的错误和违规:真正的区别?
Ergonomics. 1990 Oct-Nov;33(10-11):1315-32. doi: 10.1080/00140139008925335.
9
The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire in Arab Gulf countries: Qatar and United Arab Emirates.阿拉伯海湾国家的驾驶员行为问卷:卡塔尔和阿拉伯联合酋长国
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jul;40(4):1411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
10
Combining road safety information in a performance index.将道路安全信息纳入绩效指标。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jul;40(4):1337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Mar 11.