Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 19;20(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08479-x.
Evidence is unclear on whether inequalities in average levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) reflect differences in participation, differences in the amount of time spent active, or both. Using self-reported data from 24,882 adults (Health Survey for England 2008, 2012, 2016), we examined gender-specific inequalities in these separate aspects for total and domain-specific MVPA.
Hurdle models accommodate continuous data with excess zeros and positive skewness. Such models were used to assess differences between income groups in three aspects: (1) the probability of doing any MVPA, (2) the average hours/week spent in MVPA, and (3) the average hours/week spent in MVPA conditional on participation (MVPA-active). Inequalities were summarised on the absolute scale using average marginal effects (AMEs) after confounder adjustment.
Inequalities were robust to adjustment in each aspect for total MVPA and for sports/exercise. Differences between adults in high-income versus low-income households in sports/exercise MVPA were 2.2 h/week among men (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6, 2.8) and 1.7 h/week among women (95% CI: 1.3, 2.1); differences in sports/exercise MVPA-active were 1.3 h/week (95% CI: 0.4, 2.1) and 1.0 h/week (95% CI: 0.5, 1.6) for men and women, respectively. Heterogeneity in associations was evident for the other domains. For example, adults in high-income versus low-income households were more likely to do any walking (men: 13.0% (95% CI: 10.3, 15.8%); women: 10.2% (95% CI: 7.6, 12.8%)). Among all adults (including those who did no walking), the average hours/week spent walking showed no difference by income. Among those who did any walking, adults in high-income versus low-income households walked on average 1 h/week less (men: - 0.9 h/week (95% CI: - 1.7, - 0.2); women: - 1.0 h/week (95% CI: - 1.7, - 0.2)).
Participation and the amount of time that adults spend in MVPA typically favours those in high-income households. Monitoring inequalities in MVPA requires assessing different aspects of the distribution within each domain. Reducing inequalities in sports/exercise requires policy actions and interventions to move adults in low-income households from inactivity to activity, and to enable those already active to do more. Measures to promote walking should focus efforts on reducing the sizeable income gap in the propensity to do any walking.
关于中高强度体力活动(MVPA)的平均水平是否存在差异,其反映的是参与度的差异、活动时间的差异,还是两者兼有,目前尚无明确的证据。本研究使用来自 24882 名成年人(2008 年、2012 年和 2016 年的英国健康调查)的自我报告数据,从整体和特定领域 MVPA 两个方面,考察了不同性别在这两个方面的差异。
门限模型可以适用于存在超额零值和正偏度的连续数据。使用此类模型评估收入组在三个方面的差异:(1)进行任何 MVPA 的概率;(2)每周花费在 MVPA 上的平均小时数;(3)参与 MVPA 时(MVPA-active)每周花费的平均小时数。在进行混杂因素调整后,使用平均边际效应(AME)对绝对尺度上的不平等进行总结。
在整体 MVPA 和运动/锻炼方面,每个方面的差异在调整后都是稳健的。在运动/锻炼 MVPA 方面,高收入家庭和低收入家庭的成年人之间的差异在男性中为 2.2 小时/周(95%置信区间(CI):1.6,2.8),在女性中为 1.7 小时/周(95% CI:1.3,2.1);在运动/锻炼 MVPA-active 方面,男性为 1.3 小时/周(95% CI:0.4,2.1),女性为 1.0 小时/周(95% CI:0.5,1.6)。在其他领域,关联的异质性是显而易见的。例如,高收入家庭的成年人比低收入家庭的成年人更有可能进行任何形式的步行(男性:13.0%(95% CI:10.3,15.8%);女性:10.2%(95% CI:7.6,12.8%))。在所有成年人(包括那些不进行步行的成年人)中,步行的平均每周时间没有差异。对于那些进行了任何步行的成年人,高收入家庭和低收入家庭的成年人平均每周少走 1 小时(男性:-0.9 小时/周(95% CI:-1.7,-0.2);女性:-1.0 小时/周(95% CI:-1.7,-0.2))。
参与度和成年人在 MVPA 上花费的时间通常对高收入家庭有利。监测 MVPA 中的不平等需要评估每个领域内分布的不同方面。减少运动/锻炼方面的不平等需要政策行动和干预措施,以使低收入家庭中的成年人从不活跃转变为活跃,并使已经活跃的成年人增加活动量。促进步行的措施应集中精力减少在进行任何步行的意愿方面存在的巨大收入差距。