The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Caritas Institute of Higher Education, Hong Kong.
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Jun;27(4):924-934. doi: 10.1177/0969733019895804. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
Fifteen years have passed since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. At that time, there were reports of heroic acts among professionals who cared for these patients, whose bravery and professionalism were highly praised. However, there are concerns about changes in new generation of nursing professionals.
We aimed to examine the attitude of nursing students, should they be faced with severe acute respiratory syndrome patients during their future work.
A questionnaire survey was carried out to examine the attitude among final-year nursing students to three ethical areas, namely, duty of care, resource allocation, and collateral damage.
This study was carried out in accordance with the requirements and recommendations of the Central Research and Ethics Committee, School of Health Sciences at Caritas Institute of Higher Education.
Complete responses from 102 subjects were analyzed. The overwhelming majority (96.1%) did not agree to participate in the intubation of severe acute respiratory syndrome patients if protective measures, that is, N95 mask and gown, were not available. If there were insufficient N95 masks for all the medical, nursing, and allied health workers in the hospital (resource allocation), 37.3% felt that the distribution of N95 masks should be by casting lot, while the rest disagreed. When asked about collateral damage, more than three-quarters (77.5%) said that severe acute respiratory syndrome patients should be admitted to intensive care unit. There was sex difference in nursing students' attitude toward severe acute respiratory syndrome care during pregnancy and influence of age in understanding intensive care unit care for these patients. Interestingly, 94.1% felt that there should be a separate intensive care unit for severe acute respiratory syndrome patients.
As infection control practice and isolation facilities improved over the years, relevant knowledge and nursing ethical issues related to infectious diseases should become part of nursing education and training programs, especially in preparation for outbreaks of infectious diseases or distress.
自香港爆发严重急性呼吸系统综合征以来,已经过去了 15 年。当时,有报道称照顾这些患者的专业人员表现出英勇行为,他们的勇敢和专业精神受到高度赞扬。然而,人们对新一代护理专业人员的变化表示担忧。
我们旨在考察护理专业学生在未来工作中面对严重急性呼吸综合征患者时的态度。
采用问卷调查法,考察护理专业最后一年学生在三个伦理领域(护理责任、资源分配和附带损害)的态度。
本研究按照明爱专上学院医护及健康科学学院中心研究及伦理委员会的要求和建议进行。
分析了 102 名受试者的完整回复。绝大多数(96.1%)表示,如果没有提供保护措施(即 N95 口罩和手术服),他们不同意参与严重急性呼吸综合征患者的插管。如果医院内所有医护和辅助医疗人员的 N95 口罩不足(资源分配),37.3%的人认为 N95 口罩的分配应通过抽签决定,其余人不同意。当被问及附带损害时,超过四分之三(77.5%)的人表示应将严重急性呼吸综合征患者收入重症监护病房。护理学生对妊娠期间照顾严重急性呼吸综合征患者的态度存在性别差异,年龄对理解这些患者的重症监护病房护理也有影响。有趣的是,94.1%的人认为应该为严重急性呼吸综合征患者设立单独的重症监护病房。
随着感染控制实践和隔离设施的改善,传染病相关知识和护理伦理问题应成为护理教育和培训计划的一部分,特别是在为传染病爆发或困境做准备时。