Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 May 27;23(5):339-347. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa013.
In psychiatry we often speak of constructing "models." Here we try to make sense of what such a claim might mean, starting with the most fundamental question: "What is (and isn't) a model?" We then discuss, in a concrete measurable sense, what it means for a model to be useful. In so doing, we first identify the added value that a computational model can provide in the context of accuracy and power. We then present limitations of standard statistical methods and provide suggestions for how we can expand the explanatory power of our analyses by reconceptualizing statistical models as dynamical systems. Finally, we address the problem of model building-suggesting ways in which computational psychiatry can escape the potential for cognitive biases imposed by classical hypothesis-driven research, exploiting deep systems-level information contained within neuroimaging data to advance our understanding of psychiatric neuroscience.
在精神病学中,我们经常谈到构建“模型”。在这里,我们试图从最基本的问题开始理解这样的说法可能意味着什么:“什么是(不是)模型?” 然后,我们将以具体可衡量的方式讨论模型有用的含义。在这样做的过程中,我们首先确定计算模型在准确性和功率方面可以提供的附加值。然后,我们提出了标准统计方法的局限性,并提出了通过将统计模型重新概念化为动力系统来扩展分析解释能力的建议。最后,我们解决了模型构建的问题——建议计算精神病学如何通过利用神经影像学数据中包含的深层系统级信息来逃避经典假设驱动研究强加的认知偏差的可能性,从而推进对精神神经科学的理解。