• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Survey Assessing Privacy Concerns of Smart-Home Services Provided to Individuals with Disabilities.一项评估向残疾人提供的智能家居服务隐私问题的调查。
Behav Anal Pract. 2019 Jan 7;13(1):11-21. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-00329-y. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?技术与环境:对发育障碍者而言是支持性资源还是障碍?
Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1.
3
Safety assessment of a home-based telecare system for adults with developmental disabilities in Indiana: a multi-stakeholder perspective.印第安纳州基于家庭的远程护理系统对发育障碍成年人的安全性评估:多利益相关者视角。
J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(5):265-9. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.090902. Epub 2010 May 25.
4
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.
5
Smart homes, private homes? An empirical study of technology researchers' perceptions of ethical issues in developing smart-home health technologies.智能家居,私人住宅?一项关于技术研究人员对开发智能家居健康技术中伦理问题认知的实证研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0183-z.
6
Developing a Smart Home Technology Innovation for People With Physical and Mental Health Problems: Considerations and Recommendations.为有身心健康问题的人开发智能家居技术创新:考虑因素和建议。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Apr 29;10(4):e25116. doi: 10.2196/25116.
7
Providing mainstream smart home technology as assistive technology for persons with disabilities: a qualitative study with professionals.为残疾人士提供主流智能家居技术作为辅助技术:一项针对专业人士的定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Oct;18(7):1192-1199. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1998673. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
8
Smart Home-based IoT for Real-time and Secure Remote Health Monitoring of Triage and Priority System using Body Sensors: Multi-driven Systematic Review.基于智能家居的物联网,利用身体传感器实现分诊和优先级系统的实时安全远程健康监测:多驱动系统评价。
J Med Syst. 2019 Jan 15;43(3):42. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1158-z.
9
Privacy, boundaries and smart homes for health: An ethnographic study.健康领域的隐私、界限与智能家居:一项人种志研究。
Health Place. 2018 Mar;50:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
10
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.法定心理健康服务成年客户的护理消费者提供者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Affecting Clinician Readiness to Adopt Smart Home Technology for Remote Health Monitoring: Systematic Review.影响临床医生采用智能家居技术进行远程健康监测意愿的因素:系统评价
JMIR Aging. 2024 Dec 5;7:e64367. doi: 10.2196/64367.
2
A Survey of Barriers Experienced while Providing Supervision via Telehealth: Implications for Future Research and Practice.通过远程医疗提供监督时遇到的障碍调查:对未来研究和实践的启示
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Oct 19;17(1):70-86. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00860-7. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Evaluating Sources of Continuing Education and Professional Development Used by Behavior Analysts.评估行为分析师使用的继续教育和专业发展资源
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Dec 21;16(3):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00769-7.
4
Evaluating Professional Behavior Analysts' Literature Searches.评估专业行为分析师的文献检索情况。
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Jun 3;16(1):284-295. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00720-w. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Applications of machine learning to diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.机器学习在神经退行性疾病诊断和治疗中的应用。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2020 Aug;16(8):440-456. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0377-8. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to Independent Living for Individuals with Disabilities and Seniors.残疾人和老年人独立生活的障碍。
Behav Anal Pract. 2014 Jun 11;7(2):70-7. doi: 10.1007/s40617-014-0011-6. eCollection 2014 Oct.
2
Ethical Considerations Regarding the Use of Smart Home Technologies for Older Adults: An Integrative Review.关于老年人使用智能家居技术的伦理考量:一项综合综述。
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2016;34:155-81. doi: 10.1891/0739-6686.34.155.
3
HomeLink Support Technologies at Community Living Opportunities.社区生活机会组织的家庭联系支持技术
Behav Anal Pract. 2013 Spring;6(1):80-1. doi: 10.1007/BF03391794.
4
Patient safety risks associated with telecare: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the literature.与远程护理相关的患者安全风险:文献的系统评价与叙述性综合分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 25;14:588. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0588-z.
5
The experiences of people with dementia and intellectual disabilities with surveillance technologies in residential care.痴呆症和智力残疾患者在寄宿护理机构中使用监测技术的经历。
Nurs Ethics. 2015 May;22(3):307-20. doi: 10.1177/0969733014533237. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
6
Ethical implications of home telecare for older people: a framework derived from a multisited participative study.老年人居家远程护理的伦理问题:一项多地点参与性研究得出的框架
Health Expect. 2015 Jun;18(3):438-49. doi: 10.1111/hex.12109. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
7
Telecare, remote monitoring and care.远程护理、远程监控和护理。
Bioethics. 2013 Sep;27(7):365-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01961.x. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
8
Safety assessment of a home-based telecare system for adults with developmental disabilities in Indiana: a multi-stakeholder perspective.印第安纳州基于家庭的远程护理系统对发育障碍成年人的安全性评估:多利益相关者视角。
J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(5):265-9. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.090902. Epub 2010 May 25.
9
Ethical perspectives on emerging assistive technologies: insights from focus groups with stakeholders in long-term care facilities.新兴辅助技术的伦理视角:来自长期护理机构利益相关者焦点小组的见解
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Mar;4(1):25-36. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.1.25.
10
Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of "smart home" applications.老龄化社会的技术:对“智能家居”应用的系统综述
Yearb Med Inform. 2008:33-40.

一项评估向残疾人提供的智能家居服务隐私问题的调查。

A Survey Assessing Privacy Concerns of Smart-Home Services Provided to Individuals with Disabilities.

作者信息

Brand Denys, DiGennaro Reed Florence D, Morley Mariah D, Erath Tyler G, Novak Matthew D

机构信息

1Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA.

2Present Address: Department of Psychology, California State University, Sacramento, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819-6007 USA.

出版信息

Behav Anal Pract. 2019 Jan 7;13(1):11-21. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-00329-y. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.1007/s40617-018-00329-y
PMID:32231963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7070117/
Abstract

Privacy has been identified as a primary concern among stakeholders (i.e., service recipients, advocates, administrators, family) when using technology to provide residential services to individuals in need. This paper summarizes a study that distributed a survey to agencies that provide services (e.g., clinical, recreational) and resources (e.g., advocacy groups) to people with various types of disabilities (e.g., physical, sensory, intellectual, developmental) across the United States. The results led to several recommendations about how smart-home service providers can use technology in a way that promotes client privacy. In addition, we make several suggestions for how remote staff (i.e., individuals monitoring the information gathered by technology) can assist in the process of ensuring client privacy.

摘要

在使用技术为有需要的个人提供住宿服务时,隐私已被确定为利益相关者(即服务接受者、倡导者、管理人员、家庭)最为关注的问题。本文总结了一项研究,该研究向美国各地为各类残疾人士(如身体、感官、智力、发育方面的残疾)提供服务(如临床、娱乐)和资源(如倡导团体)的机构分发了一份调查问卷。研究结果就智能家居服务提供商如何以促进客户隐私的方式使用技术提出了若干建议。此外,我们还就远程工作人员(即监控技术收集的信息的人员)如何协助确保客户隐私的过程提出了一些建议。