Comparison of human and bovine enamel in a microbial caries model at different biofilm maturations.

OBJECTIVES

To compare human versus bovine enamel when used in microbial caries models; and to evaluate the use of nylon mesh to support biofilm growth over enamel.

METHODS

Twenty-four sub-subgroups were included (time factor: 4, 8, and 12 days; substrate factor: human/bovine; mesh factor: yes/no; treatment factor: 18.4 mM NaF (350 ppm F), de-ionized water [DIW]; n = 9/sub-subgroup). Microcosm biofilm from human saliva (IRB approval #1,406,440,799) was grown on enamel specimens for 24-h (Brain Heart Infusion media; 0.2 % sucrose), using active attachment model. Then, pH-cycling took place. At the end of each pH-cycling period, enamel specimens were analyzed: surface microhardness (VHN); transverse microradiography (integrated mineral loss [ΔZ], lesion depth [L]). Biofilm was analyzed: lactic acid production (LDH activity); exopolysaccharide (EPS) amount; and viability (12-day sub-groups). Data were analyzed using ANOVA at a 5 % level of significance.

RESULTS

The three-way interaction between pH-cycling duration, substrate type, and treatment type was significant for (VHN [p < 0.0005], ΔZ [p = 0.0027], and L [p < 0.0001]). VHN exhibited increased lesion severity as pH-cycling time increases, in both treatments. VHN data indicated a treatment effect in all timepoints. ΔZ and L exhibited higher values with more mature biofilms. ANOVA analyses for LDH and EPS indicated a significance between variables (LDH p = 0.0100; EPS p < 0.0001). Mesh-covered specimens resulted in lower LDH and EPS values in all maturations. ANOVA analyses of viability (12 days) between variables was significant.

CONCLUSION

within the study's limitations, human or bovine enamel can be used in microbial in vitro caries models to study biofilm's maturation and anticaries agents.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study demonstrated how a known cariostatic effect of a fluoride concentration in toothpastes can be modulated by the maturation stage of oral biofilm. This can represent hard to reach areas in the oral cavity (e.g. in orthodontic patients or patients with intermaxillary fixation following oral and maxillofacial surgeries).