• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嗅觉功能障碍的味觉教育与训练:一项初步研究。

Flavor education and training in olfactory dysfunction: a pilot study.

作者信息

Besser Gerold, Oswald Michaela M, Liu David T, Renner Bertold, Mueller Christian A

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jul;277(7):1987-1994. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05950-8. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00405-020-05950-8
PMID:32248300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7286942/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Olfactory training is recommended in olfactory dysfunction (OD) showing promising results. OD patients frequently ask for training modifications in the hope of a better outcome. Also, a lack of knowledge of the flavor system is evident. This investigation sought to implement flavor education (FE) and encourage patients to experience flavors in terms of a flavor training (FT).

METHODS

In included patients (n = 30), OD was either of postinfectious (86.7%) or posttraumatic (13.3%) cause. Chemosensory abilities were tested orthonasally (using Sniffin Sticks = TDI) and retronasally (using the Candy Smell Test = CST). Key points of flavor perception were demonstrated in an educative session. Subjects were instructed to consciously experience flavors out of a list of 50. Effects of FT were explored in two groups (group A and B), with group B starting FT 17 weeks later.

RESULTS

FE was appreciated and drop-out rate stayed very low (one participant). Compliance was high and 30.4 ± 12.9 flavors were tried. Overall TDI scores improved in 10 patients (6 group A, 4 group B) in a clinically significant way (> 5.5). For group A (starting FT earlier) rm-ANOVA showed a significant effect of session (timepoint) on CST (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Flavor education is demonstrated as feasible and appreciated in a clinical setting. FT seems to be a welcomed second-line therapy in patients with olfactory dysfunction. This study shows beneficial trends of FT; however, further studies with larger sample sizes and standardized training protocols are needed.

摘要

目的

嗅觉训练被推荐用于嗅觉功能障碍(OD),已显示出有前景的结果。OD患者经常要求对训练进行调整,以期获得更好的结果。此外,对味觉系统缺乏了解的情况也很明显。本研究旨在实施味觉教育(FE),并鼓励患者通过味觉训练(FT)来体验味道。

方法

纳入的患者(n = 30)中,OD的病因要么是感染后(86.7%),要么是创伤后(13.3%)。通过鼻腔前部(使用嗅棒=嗅觉辨别力测试)和鼻腔后部(使用糖果嗅觉测试=CST)测试化学感觉能力。在一次教育课程中展示了味觉感知的关键点。指导受试者有意识地体验50种味道清单中的味道。在两组(A组和B组)中探索FT的效果,B组在17周后开始FT。

结果

FE受到欢迎,脱落率非常低(一名参与者)。依从性很高,尝试了30.4±12.9种味道。10名患者(A组6名,B组4名)的总体嗅觉辨别力测试分数有临床显著改善(>5.5)。对于A组(更早开始FT),重复测量方差分析显示训练阶段(时间点)对CST有显著影响(p<0.01)。

结论

味觉教育在临床环境中被证明是可行的且受到欢迎。FT似乎是嗅觉功能障碍患者受欢迎的二线治疗方法。本研究显示了FT的有益趋势;然而,需要进一步开展更大样本量和标准化训练方案的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71d/7286942/868c309ab181/405_2020_5950_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71d/7286942/a872f706b99b/405_2020_5950_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71d/7286942/4de0c7ea4491/405_2020_5950_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71d/7286942/868c309ab181/405_2020_5950_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71d/7286942/a872f706b99b/405_2020_5950_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71d/7286942/4de0c7ea4491/405_2020_5950_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71d/7286942/868c309ab181/405_2020_5950_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Flavor education and training in olfactory dysfunction: a pilot study.嗅觉功能障碍的味觉教育与训练:一项初步研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jul;277(7):1987-1994. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05950-8. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
2
Retronasal olfactory function in patients with smell loss but subjectively normal flavor perception.嗅觉丧失但主观味觉正常患者的鼻后嗅觉功能。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Jul;130(7):1629-1633. doi: 10.1002/lary.28258. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
3
Long-lasting olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients.新冠病毒感染患者的持久嗅觉功能障碍。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul;279(7):3485-3492. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07153-1. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
Association Between Orthonasal Olfaction and Chemosensory Perception in Patients With Smell Loss.嗅觉丧失患者的鼻前嗅觉与化学感觉感知之间的关联。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Sep;130(9):2213-2219. doi: 10.1002/lary.28773. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
Effects of classical olfactory training in patients with COVID-19-related persistent loss of smell.COVID-19 相关持续性嗅觉丧失患者的经典嗅觉训练效果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Feb;280(2):757-763. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07570-w. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
6
Symptoms of Depression in Patients with Chemosensory Disorders.化学感觉障碍患者的抑郁症状。
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2021;83(3):135-143. doi: 10.1159/000513751. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
7
Self-perceived Taste and Flavor Perception: Associations With Quality of Life in Patients With Olfactory Loss.自我感知的味觉和风味感知:与嗅觉丧失患者生活质量的关联。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jun;164(6):1330-1336. doi: 10.1177/0194599820965242. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
8
Chemosensory Functions After Glossectomy-A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.舌切除术后的化学感觉功能:一项横断面初步研究。
Laryngoscope. 2023 Feb;133(2):375-382. doi: 10.1002/lary.30454. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
9
Characteristics of Olfactory Disorder With and Without Reported Flavor Loss.有和没有报告味觉丧失的嗅觉障碍特征。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130(12):2869-2873. doi: 10.1002/lary.29070. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
10
[Clinical application of Sniffin' Sticks olfactory psychophysical measurements].[嗅觉棒嗅觉心理物理学测量的临床应用]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;48(9):741-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing modified olfactory training to prevent cognitive decline in MCI high-risk individuals: a multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol in Beijing tertiary hospitals.评估改良嗅觉训练对轻度认知障碍高危个体认知功能衰退的预防作用:一项北京三级医院的多中心随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 13;15(8):e100880. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100880.
2
Statistical overview of the Sniffin' sticks olfactory test from the perspectives of anosmia and hyposmia.从嗅觉丧失和嗅觉减退角度看嗅觉棒嗅觉测试的统计概述
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 15;15(1):8984. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93380-z.
3
Four odorants for olfactory training are enough: a pilot study.

本文引用的文献

1
Retronasal olfactory function in patients with smell loss but subjectively normal flavor perception.嗅觉丧失但主观味觉正常患者的鼻后嗅觉功能。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Jul;130(7):1629-1633. doi: 10.1002/lary.28258. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
2
Perceptual learning in the chemical senses: A review.化学感觉的知觉学习:综述。
Food Res Int. 2019 Sep;123:746-761. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
3
The use of freeze-dried retronasal stimuli to assess olfactory function.使用冻干逆行嗅觉刺激评估嗅觉功能。
四种气味用于嗅觉训练已足够:一项初步研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Dec;281(12):6445-6458. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08930-4. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
4
Eating behavior in patients with smell loss.嗅觉丧失患者的饮食行为。
Front Nutr. 2022 Nov 9;9:993639. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.993639. eCollection 2022.
5
Improving taste sensitivity in healthy adults using taste recall training: a randomized controlled trial.利用味觉回忆训练提高健康成年人的味觉灵敏度:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 16;12(1):13849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18255-z.
6
Effect of early olfactory training on olfactory recovery after nasal endoscopy in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and olfactory impairment.早期嗅觉训练对慢性鼻窦炎伴嗅觉障碍患者鼻内镜术后嗅觉恢复的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Apr 15;14(4):2600-2608. eCollection 2022.
7
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.国际过敏与鼻科学学会共识声明:嗅觉。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Apr;12(4):327-680. doi: 10.1002/alr.22929.
8
Olfaction: Sensitive indicator of inflammatory burden in chronic rhinosinusitis.嗅觉:慢性鼻-鼻窦炎炎症负荷的敏感指标。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Oct 28;5(6):992-1002. doi: 10.1002/lio2.485. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 Sep;44(5):770-777. doi: 10.1111/coa.13389. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
4
Clinical Usefulness of Self-Rated Olfactory Performance-A Data Science-Based Assessment of 6000 Patients.基于自我评估嗅觉表现的临床实用性——对 6000 名患者的数据分析评估。
Chem Senses. 2019 Jul 17;44(6):357-364. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjz029.
5
Quality of Life in Patients With Olfactory Loss Is Better Predicted by Flavor Identification Than by Orthonasal Olfactory Function.嗅觉丧失患者的生活质量由味觉识别预测优于由鼻前嗅觉功能预测。
Chem Senses. 2019 Jul 17;44(6):371-377. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjz027.
6
Effectiveness of olfactory training on different severities of posttraumatic loss of smell.嗅觉训练对不同严重程度创伤后嗅觉丧失的有效性。
Laryngoscope. 2019 Aug;129(8):1737-1743. doi: 10.1002/lary.27832. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
7
Restoration of olfaction: is there light at the end of the tunnel?嗅觉恢复:隧道尽头有曙光吗?
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Feb;9(2):129-130. doi: 10.1002/alr.22292. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
8
Retronasal Odor Perception Requires Taste Cortex, but Orthonasal Does Not.经鼻嗅觉感知需要味觉皮质,但非经鼻嗅觉则不需要。
Curr Biol. 2019 Jan 7;29(1):62-69.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
9
Updated Sniffin' Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects.基于9139名受试者的扩展样本更新的嗅觉棒常模数据。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;276(3):719-728. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5248-1. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
10
Etiology of subjective taste loss.主观味觉丧失的病因。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Apr;9(4):409-412. doi: 10.1002/alr.22263. Epub 2018 Dec 10.