土耳其语版下背痛结局评分的信效度
Reliability and validation of the Turkish version of the Low Back Outcome Score.
作者信息
Alhomedah Ghofran, Çıtaker Seyit, Günaydın Gürkan, Sezer Refia, Khan Furqan
机构信息
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Gazi University, Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
Department Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, İzzet Baysal Training and Research Hospital, Bolu, Turkey.
出版信息
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Mar;54(2):161-167. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.02.415.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to validate the Turkish version of the Low Back Outcome Score and check its reliability in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP).
METHODS
Overall, 105 patients (81 women and 24 men; mean age: 49.5 years (18-65 years)) with a complaint of LBP for at least 3 months were included in this study. Test-retest reliability was assessed after 7 days. Overall score of LBOS was compared with the overall scores of "Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnaire," "Oswestry Disability Index," "Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale," "SF-36," and "Bournemouth Questionnaire for Back Pain" to calculate the convergent validity by using Pearson correlation coefficient.
RESULTS
The questionnaire was noted to have high internal consistency. The test-retest analysis revealed an excellent correlation (ICC=0.80). Pearson correlation coefficient of the LBOS was assessed using VAS and had an excellent correlation with all the questionnaires included in this study.
CONCLUSION
The Turkish version of the LBOS questionnaire appeared to be a valid and reliable outcome measure.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III, Diagnostic study.
目的
本研究旨在验证土耳其语版的下腰痛结局评分，并检查其在慢性下腰痛（LBP）患者中的可靠性。
方法
本研究共纳入105例主诉LBP至少3个月的患者（81例女性和24例男性；平均年龄：49.5岁（18 - 65岁））。7天后评估重测信度。将LBOS的总分与“罗兰 - 莫里斯残疾问卷”“奥斯维斯特残疾指数”“魁北克腰痛残疾量表”“SF - 36”和“伯恩茅斯背痛问卷”的总分进行比较，使用皮尔逊相关系数计算收敛效度。
结果
该问卷具有较高的内部一致性。重测分析显示相关性极佳（ICC = 0.80）。使用视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评估LBOS的皮尔逊相关系数，其与本研究中纳入的所有问卷均具有极佳的相关性。
结论
土耳其语版的LBOS问卷似乎是一种有效且可靠的结局指标。
证据水平
III级，诊断性研究。
Zotero 插件