Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Global Nutrition and Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Int Breastfeed J. 2020 Apr 8;15(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13006-020-00268-x.
The marketing practices of the breastmilk substitutes industry have been known for decades, but little is known about the influence of the baby food industry, more generally, on public health policy, research and practice, also known as 'corporate political activity' (CPA). In this study, the baby food industry refers to for-profit companies that manufacture, market or distribute breastmilk substitutes and food products for infants and young children under two years. In addition, trade associations, public relations firms, marketing agencies and individuals or groups affiliated with the baby food industry are also considered to be part of the baby food industry. The aim of the current study was to systematically identify and monitor the CPA of the baby food industry in the USA, shown by the activities of Nestlé, the largest industry actor in this sector in the country.
The case study consisted of an analysis of publicly available information for data published between January and November 2018. We included documents from the industry, the government and other sources, including professional organisations, charities and consumer associations. We analysed data using an existing framework to classify the CPA of the food industry.
During the period of data collection, Nestlé employed a list of action-based 'instrumental strategies'. The most prominent strategy was 'information strategy', used to fund, produce and disseminate industry-preferred information. Nestlé was further found to 'establish relationships with key opinion leaders and health organisations, and the media', 'seek involvement in community' and directly influence policies and programs through indirect access and the placement of actors in government policy settings. The company also used argument-based 'discursive strategies' to frame the debate on diet- and public health-related issues.
This study showed that Nestlé used various CPA strategies which may have influenced public health policy, research and practice in ways favourable to the baby food industry. These results could be used to further recognise and pre-empt the influence of corporations on health, in order to ensure that commercial interests do not prevail over public health goals.
几十年来,人们一直都知道母乳代用品行业的营销手段,但对于婴儿食品行业(通常称为“企业政治活动”)对公共卫生政策、研究和实践的影响却知之甚少。在本研究中,婴儿食品行业是指制造、营销或分销母乳代用品和 2 岁以下婴幼儿食品产品的营利性公司。此外,贸易协会、公关公司、营销机构以及与婴儿食品行业相关的个人或团体也被视为婴儿食品行业的一部分。本研究旨在系统地识别和监测美国婴儿食品行业的企业政治活动,以雀巢公司(该国该行业最大的参与者)的活动为例。
本案例研究包括对 2018 年 1 月至 11 月期间公布的公开信息进行分析。我们纳入了来自行业、政府和其他来源(包括专业组织、慈善机构和消费者协会)的文件。我们使用现有框架分析数据,对食品行业的企业政治活动进行分类。
在数据收集期间,雀巢公司采用了一系列基于行动的“策略”。最突出的策略是“信息策略”,用于资助、制作和传播行业偏好的信息。研究还发现雀巢公司“与关键意见领袖和卫生组织以及媒体建立关系”“参与社区活动”,并通过间接介入和在政府政策制定中安置行为体,直接影响政策和项目。该公司还使用基于论点的“话语策略”来构建与饮食和公共卫生相关问题的辩论。
本研究表明,雀巢公司使用了各种企业政治活动策略,这些策略可能以有利于婴儿食品行业的方式影响公共卫生政策、研究和实践。这些结果可用于进一步认识和防范企业对健康的影响,以确保商业利益不会凌驾于公共卫生目标之上。