China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease and National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
These authors are joint first authors.
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jun 4;55(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00562-2020. Print 2020 Jun.
During the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), consistent and considerable differences in disease severity and mortality rate of patients treated in Hubei province compared to those in other parts of China have been observed. We sought to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients being treated inside and outside Hubei province, and explore the factors underlying these differences.
Collaborating with the National Health Commission, we established a retrospective cohort to study hospitalised COVID-19 cases in China. Clinical characteristics, the rate of severe events and deaths, and the time to critical illness (invasive ventilation or intensive care unit admission or death) were compared between patients within and outside Hubei. The impact of Wuhan-related exposure (a presumed key factor that drove the severe situation in Hubei, as Wuhan is the epicentre as well the administrative centre of Hubei province) and the duration between symptom onset and admission on prognosis were also determined.
At the data cut-off (31 January 2020), 1590 cases from 575 hospitals in 31 provincial administrative regions were collected (core cohort). The overall rate of severe cases and mortality was 16.0% and 3.2%, respectively. Patients in Hubei (predominantly with Wuhan-related exposure, 597 (92.3%) out of 647) were older (mean age 49.7 44.9 years), had more cases with comorbidity (32.9% 19.7%), higher symptomatic burden, abnormal radiologic manifestations and, especially, a longer waiting time between symptom onset and admission (5.7 4.5 days) compared with patients outside Hubei. Patients in Hubei (severe event rate 23.0% 11.1%, death rate 7.3% 0.3%, HR (95% CI) for critical illness 1.59 (1.05-2.41)) have a poorer prognosis compared with patients outside Hubei after adjusting for age and comorbidity. However, among patients outside Hubei, the duration from symptom onset to hospitalisation (mean 4.4 4.7 days) and prognosis (HR (95%) 0.84 (0.40-1.80)) were similar between patients with or without Wuhan-related exposure. In the overall population, the waiting time, but neither treated in Hubei nor Wuhan-related exposure, remained an independent prognostic factor (HR (95%) 1.05 (1.01-1.08)).
There were more severe cases and poorer outcomes for COVID-19 patients treated in Hubei, which might be attributed to the prolonged duration of symptom onset to hospitalisation in the epicentre. Future studies to determine the reason for delaying hospitalisation are warranted.
在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)爆发期间,湖北省与中国其他地区的患者在疾病严重程度和死亡率方面存在明显且持续的差异。我们旨在比较湖北省内外患者的临床特征和结局,并探讨这些差异的原因。
我们与国家卫生健康委员会合作,建立了一个回顾性队列,以研究中国的住院 COVID-19 病例。比较了湖北省内外患者的临床特征、严重事件和死亡发生率,以及从发病到出现危急病症(有创通气或重症监护病房入住或死亡)的时间。还确定了与武汉相关的暴露(这是导致湖北省严重情况的一个关键因素,因为武汉既是湖北省的省会,也是湖北省的行政中心)以及从发病到入院的时间对预后的影响。
在数据截止日期(2020 年 1 月 31 日)时,从中国 31 个省级行政区的 575 家医院收集了 1590 例病例(核心队列)。严重病例和死亡率分别为 16.0%和 3.2%。来自湖北省的患者(主要与武汉相关的暴露,647 例中有 597 例,占 92.3%)年龄较大(平均年龄 49.7 岁 44.9 岁),合并症更多(32.9% 19.7%),症状负担更重,放射学表现异常,尤其是从发病到入院的等待时间更长(5.7 天 4.5 天)。与来自湖北省以外的患者相比,来自湖北省的患者(严重事件发生率为 23.0% 11.1%,死亡率为 7.3% 0.3%,危急病的 HR(95%CI)为 1.59(1.05-2.41))预后较差。然而,在调整年龄和合并症后,来自湖北省以外的患者中,从发病到住院的时间(平均 4.4 天 4.7 天)和预后(HR(95%)0.84(0.40-1.80))在有或没有武汉相关暴露的患者之间相似。在总体人群中,等待时间,而不是在湖北或与武汉相关的暴露,仍然是一个独立的预后因素(HR(95%)1.05(1.01-1.08))。
在湖北省治疗的 COVID-19 患者中,严重病例和预后较差,这可能归因于该省发病到住院的时间延长。有必要进一步研究以确定住院延迟的原因。