Suppr超能文献

身体活动和屏幕时间推荐的组合及其与青少年超重/肥胖的关系。

Combinations of physical activity and screen time recommendations and their association with overweight/obesity in adolescents.

机构信息

School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Department of Applied Human Sciences, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2020 Aug;111(4):515-522. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00313-6. Epub 2020 Apr 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the four possible combinations of adherence to physical activity and screen time recommendations in adolescents and how the combinations relate to overweight and obesity.

METHODS

A total of 9913 students in grades 7-12 were included in the present cross-sectional analyses. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), screen time, and body mass index were self-reported. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to test the associations between combinations of MVPA (≥ 60 min/day [active] or < 60 min/day [inactive]) and screen time (≤ 2 h/day [not sedentary] or > 2 h/day [sedentary]) recommendations with overweight/obesity.

RESULTS

We found that 53.1% of students in Ontario were considered "inactive+sedentary", 23.7% were considered "inactive+not sedentary", 12.1% were considered "active+sedentary", and 11.1% were considered "active+not sedentary". Some characteristics of "active+not sedentary" students (optimal category) included younger age, male gender, white ethnicity, higher socio-economic status, optimal sleep duration, and lower prevalence of cannabis use. After adjusting for relevant covariates, the "inactive+sedentary" group was more likely to report overweight/obesity than the "active+not sedentary" group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26-2.32). The "inactive+not sedentary" group was also more likely to report overweight/obesity (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.20-1.97) while the "active+sedentary" group was not significantly associated with overweight/obesity (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.88-1.83).

CONCLUSION

Children meeting both the physical activity and screen time recommendations are less likely to be classified as overweight/obese compared with any other combination. Future efforts are needed to target both MVPA and sedentary behaviour to address public health concerns such as excess weight.

摘要

目的

研究青少年中遵循体力活动和屏幕时间建议的四种可能组合方式,以及这些组合方式与超重和肥胖的关系。

方法

本横断面分析共纳入了 9913 名 7-12 年级的学生。采用多变量逻辑回归分析,检验了体力活动(MVPA)(≥60 分钟/天[活跃]或<60 分钟/天[不活跃])和屏幕时间(≤2 小时/天[不静坐]或>2 小时/天[静坐])建议的组合与超重/肥胖之间的关联。

结果

我们发现,安大略省有 53.1%的学生被认为是“不活跃+静坐”,23.7%的学生被认为是“不活跃+不静坐”,12.1%的学生被认为是“活跃+静坐”,11.1%的学生被认为是“活跃+不静坐”。“活跃+不静坐”学生的一些特征(最佳类别)包括年龄较小、男性、白人、社会经济地位较高、最佳睡眠时间和较低的大麻使用率。调整相关协变量后,与“活跃+不静坐”组相比,“不活跃+静坐”组报告超重/肥胖的可能性更高(比值比[OR] 1.71,95%置信区间[CI] 1.26-2.32)。“不活跃+不静坐”组报告超重/肥胖的可能性也更高(OR 1.54,95% CI 1.20-1.97),而“活跃+静坐”组与超重/肥胖无显著相关性(OR 1.27,95% CI 0.88-1.83)。

结论

与任何其他组合相比,同时符合体力活动和屏幕时间建议的儿童更不容易被归类为超重/肥胖。未来需要努力同时针对体力活动和久坐行为,以解决超重等公共卫生问题。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验