Suppr超能文献

美国的埃博拉危机应对:沟通管理与标准操作程序

Ebola crisis response in the USA: Communication management and SOPs.

作者信息

Andrew Simon A, Arlikatti Sudha, Chatterjee Vaswati, Ismayilov Orkhan

机构信息

Department of Public Administration, University of North Texas, 410 Avenue C, Chilton Hall Suite 204, Denton, TX 76203, USA.

Business Continuity Management and Integrated Emergency Management Programs, Faculty of Resilience, Rabdan Academy, P.O. Box. 114646, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018 Oct;31:243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.028. Epub 2018 May 1.

Abstract

This research focuses on the 2014 Ebola crisis response by emergency managers in the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) Metropolitan region in the State of Texas, U.S.A. It examines the patterns of crisis communication and the use of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) during the first month of the crisis. Primary data collected from 24 face-to-face interviews and 12 online surveys are analyzed. The research identifies elements contributing to organizational failures, which by their very nature gain public and media attention, and also explicates the less mentioned successful decisions made by response agencies in the DFW region. It is important to investigate both failures and successes to help inform organizational learning for better preparedness to future health crises. Findings suggest that, although there was a breakdown in communication between small city governments/ municipalities and higher levels of government at the State and Federal levels, prior training and collaborative relationships helped in improvised decision-making. Takeaways for practitioners include reiterating the importance of establishing SOPs, merits of flexibility, and improvisational decisions for shared learning.

摘要

本研究聚焦于美国得克萨斯州达拉斯 - 沃思堡(DFW)大都市地区应急管理人员对2014年埃博拉危机的应对。它考察了危机第一个月期间的危机沟通模式以及标准操作程序(SOPs)的使用情况。对从24次面对面访谈和12次在线调查中收集的原始数据进行了分析。该研究确定了导致组织失败的因素,这些因素因其性质而引起公众和媒体关注,同时也阐述了DFW地区应对机构做出的较少被提及的成功决策。调查失败和成功案例对于帮助组织学习以便更好地应对未来健康危机很重要。研究结果表明,尽管小城市政府/市政当局与州和联邦层面的上级政府之间存在沟通不畅的情况,但先前的培训和合作关系有助于临时决策。给从业者的启示包括重申建立标准操作程序的重要性、灵活性的优点以及为共同学习而进行的即兴决策。

相似文献

1
Ebola crisis response in the USA: Communication management and SOPs.美国的埃博拉危机应对:沟通管理与标准操作程序
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018 Oct;31:243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.028. Epub 2018 May 1.

引用本文的文献

6
Biodefence research two decades on: worth the investment?生物防御研究二十年:值得投资吗?
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;21(8):e222-e233. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00382-0.

本文引用的文献

2
Knowledge and risk perceptions of the Ebola virus in the United States.美国对埃博拉病毒的认知与风险感知
Prev Med Rep. 2015 Apr 16;2:262-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.04.005. eCollection 2015.
5
What is Ebola?什么是埃博拉?
Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Jan;69(1):49-58. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12593. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验