Draper D L, Barry A L
J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Apr;5(4):439-43. doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.4.439-443.1977.
A simple screening test is described for separating Bacteroides fragilis from other anaerobic gram-negative bacilli. The test utilizes filter paper disks impregnated with 25 mg of oxgall (Difco), tested in conjunction with antibiotic identification disks. The bile disks and antibiotic disks are placed on a supplemented brucella blood agar plate which has been inoculated by swabbing with a standardized cell suspension. After 24 h at 35 degrees C in a GasPak jar, resistance to kanamycin and bile is taken as a presumptive identification of B. fragilis. Susceptibility to one or both disks indicates the need for further identification and additional biochemical tests are required. Those strains that produce insufficient growth within 24 h are not likely to be B. fragilis. The reliability of the bile disk method was tested by comparing results with 100 clinical isolates versus results with bile in thioglycolate broth, peptone-yeast extract-glucose broth, and tryptic soy agar. All four bile test methods gave equilvalent results, but the broth media required much longer periods of incubation.
本文描述了一种简单的筛选试验,用于从其他厌氧革兰氏阴性杆菌中分离脆弱拟杆菌。该试验采用浸渍有25mg牛胆汁(Difco)的滤纸圆盘,并与抗生素鉴定圆盘联合使用。将胆汁圆盘和抗生素圆盘放置在已用标准化细胞悬液接种的补充布鲁氏菌血琼脂平板上。在GasPak罐中于35℃培养24小时后,对卡那霉素和胆汁的耐药性被视为脆弱拟杆菌的初步鉴定。对一个或两个圆盘敏感表明需要进一步鉴定,并需要进行额外的生化试验。那些在24小时内生长不足的菌株不太可能是脆弱拟杆菌。通过将100株临床分离株的结果与硫乙醇酸盐肉汤、蛋白胨 - 酵母提取物 - 葡萄糖肉汤和胰蛋白胨大豆琼脂中胆汁的结果进行比较,测试了胆汁圆盘法的可靠性。所有四种胆汁测试方法都给出了等效结果,但肉汤培养基需要更长的孵育时间。