• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婚姻强奸判决作为荣誉文化、男性声誉威胁和观察者性别影响的函数:土耳其、德国和英国之间的跨文化比较。

Judgments of marital rape as a function of honor culture, masculine reputation threat, and observer gender: A cross-cultural comparison between Turkey, Germany, and the UK.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Department of Education and Psychology, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Aggress Behav. 2020 Jul;46(4):341-353. doi: 10.1002/ab.21893. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1002/ab.21893
PMID:32350879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7318317/
Abstract

Previous research has shown that there is higher tolerance of violence against women in cultures with salient gender-specific honor norms, especially when the violence occurs in intimate relationships and in response to threat to male honor. The present cross-cultural study (N = 398) extended these findings to sexual aggression (i.e., marital rape) by comparing participants from a culture that emphasizes honor (Turkey) and participants from cultures without strong honor traditions (Germany and Britain). Turkish participants blamed the victim and exonerated the perpetrator more than did German and British participants. In all cultural groups, participants blamed the victim and exonerated the perpetrator more when the husband's reputation was threatened than in the absence of such threat, and in all cultural groups, men blamed the victim and exonerated the perpetrator more than women. Yet, the effect of masculine reputation threat and this pattern of gender differences were somewhat more pronounced among Turkish than German or British participants. Results exploring the predictive role of honor norms at the individual level beyond rape myth acceptance and traditional gender role attitudes revealed that honor norms were the primary predictor of rape perceptions and blame attributions in Turkey (an honor culture), but not in Germany and Britain (dignity cultures) where rape myth acceptance was the strongest predictor. These results provide insights into the cultural factors influencing marital rape judgments in ways that may undermine victim's well-being and fair handling of rape cases, and highlight the domains most urgently in need of potential intervention.

摘要

先前的研究表明,在具有明显性别特定荣誉规范的文化中,对暴力侵害妇女行为的容忍度更高,尤其是在亲密关系中以及对男性荣誉受到威胁时。本跨文化研究(N=398)通过比较强调荣誉的文化(土耳其)和没有强烈荣誉传统的文化(德国和英国)的参与者,将这些发现扩展到了性侵犯(即婚内强奸)。与德国和英国的参与者相比,土耳其的参与者更多地指责受害者并为加害者开脱。在所有文化群体中,当丈夫的声誉受到威胁时,参与者比在没有这种威胁时更多地指责受害者并为加害者开脱,而在所有文化群体中,男性比女性更多地指责受害者并为加害者开脱。然而,在土耳其参与者中,男性声誉威胁的影响以及这种性别差异模式比在德国或英国参与者中更为明显。探索个人层面的荣誉规范在超越强奸神话接受度和传统性别角色态度方面的预测作用的结果表明,荣誉规范是土耳其(荣誉文化)对强奸认知和指责归因的主要预测因素,但在德国和英国(尊严文化)并非如此,在这些国家,强奸神话接受度是最强的预测因素。这些结果深入了解了影响婚姻强奸判断的文化因素,这些因素可能会损害受害者的福祉和对强奸案件的公正处理,并突出了最迫切需要潜在干预的领域。

相似文献

1
Judgments of marital rape as a function of honor culture, masculine reputation threat, and observer gender: A cross-cultural comparison between Turkey, Germany, and the UK.婚姻强奸判决作为荣誉文化、男性声誉威胁和观察者性别影响的函数:土耳其、德国和英国之间的跨文化比较。
Aggress Behav. 2020 Jul;46(4):341-353. doi: 10.1002/ab.21893. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
2
The Interaction Between Observer Sex and Sexual Identity on Attributions of Blame With a Heterosexual Female Victim.观察者性别与性身份认同对异性女性受害者归咎的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):NP527-NP554. doi: 10.1177/0886260517733281. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
3
The Influence of Gender Ideology, Victim Resistance, and Spiking a Drink on Acquaintance Rape Attributions.性别意识形态、受害者反抗和下药对熟人强奸归因的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Oct;33(20):3186-3210. doi: 10.1177/0886260516635318. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
4
Male rape victim and perpetrator blaming.男性强奸受害者和加害者指责。
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Jun;25(6):969-88. doi: 10.1177/0886260509340534. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
5
Traditionalism and victim blaming.传统主义和归咎受害者。
J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jul 4;161(4):492-507. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1896466. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
6
Recommendations to disclose sexual assault are motivated by retribution among women who endorse honor values.建议披露性侵犯是出于支持荣誉价值观的女性的报复动机。
Aggress Behav. 2022 Jan;48(1):55-74. doi: 10.1002/ab.21999. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
7
Who Gets Blamed for Rapes: Effects of Immigration Status on the Attribution of Blame Toward Victims and Perpetrators.强奸事件中谁应受谴责:移民身份对受害者和犯罪者谴责归因的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Jul;35(13-14):2446-2463. doi: 10.1177/0886260517703371. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
8
Effects of perpetrator gender and victim sexuality on blame toward male victims of sexual assault.犯罪者性别和受害者性取向对性侵犯男性受害者责备的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2006 Jun;146(3):275-91. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.146.3.275-291.
9
Looking for Blame: Rape Myth Acceptance and Attention to Victim and Perpetrator.寻找罪责:强奸谬见认同以及对受害者和犯罪者的关注
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Aug;32(15):2323-2344. doi: 10.1177/0886260515591975. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
10
Modern Rape Myths: Justifying Victim and Perpetrator Blame in Sexual Violence.现代强奸神话:性暴力中受害者和加害者罪责的合理化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 17;20(3):1663. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031663.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and data synthesis on the treatment of sexual violence victimization by an intimate partner.对亲密伴侣性暴力受害的治疗进行系统评价和数据综合。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2024 Jan;50(1):71-94. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12670. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
2
The role of honour in interpersonal, intrapersonal and intergroup processes.荣誉在人际、个体内和群体间过程中的作用。
Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2023 Jan;17(1):e12719. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12719. Epub 2022 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Culture, Masculine Honor, and Violence Toward Women.文化、男性荣誉与针对妇女的暴力
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Apr;44(4):538-549. doi: 10.1177/0146167217744195. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
2
Honor killings in the Middle East and North Africa: a systematic review of the literature.中东和北非的荣誉谋杀:文献系统综述。
Violence Against Women. 2011 Nov;17(11):1442-64. doi: 10.1177/1077801211434127.
3
Within- and between-culture variation: individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures.文化内和文化间的变化:个体差异与荣誉文化、面子文化和尊严文化的文化逻辑。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Mar;100(3):507-26. doi: 10.1037/a0022151.
4
Perceptions of rape and attitudes toward women in a sample of Lebanese students.黎巴嫩学生样本中的强奸观念和对女性的态度。
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Apr;25(4):735-52. doi: 10.1177/0886260509334410. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
5
The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: development and validation in German and English.现代性侵犯神话接受量表:德语和英语版本的编制与验证
Aggress Behav. 2007 Sep-Oct;33(5):422-40. doi: 10.1002/ab.20195.
6
Attitudes toward rape: a comparison between Asian and Caucasian college students.对强奸的态度:亚洲和白种人大学生之间的比较。
Violence Against Women. 2005 Feb;11(2):177-96. doi: 10.1177/1077801204271663.
7
Male honor and female fidelity: implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence.男性荣誉与女性忠贞:延续家庭暴力的隐性文化脚本。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 May;84(5):997-1010. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997.
8
Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity.对陌生人强奸和熟人强奸的认知:善意和敌意性别歧视在受害者指责及强奸倾向中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jan;84(1):111-25.
9
Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: an "experimental ethnography".侮辱、攻击性与南方荣誉文化:一项“实验民族志”研究
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 May;70(5):945-59. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.5.945.