Li Hui-Fang, Shen Qi-Hong, Chen Wen-Jun, Chen Wei-Min, Feng Zhang-Feng, Yu Li-Ying
Department of TCM Gynecology, Tongxiang Maternal and Child Health-Care Center, Tongxiang, Zhejiang, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Apr 21;2020:1789304. doi: 10.1155/2020/1789304. eCollection 2020.
We carried out this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of TKABP on POI.
The following eight databases were searched from the establishment to September 30, 2019, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs): PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the Chinese BioMedical database (CBM), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), and the Wanfang database. The quality of evidence was estimated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).
Twenty-three RCTs involving 1712 patients with POI were included. Compared to hormone therapy (HT) groups, TKABP groups showed a significantly higher total effective rate (RR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.04-1.17; < 0.01, = 32%). In addition, TKABP groups revealed a better improvement in terms of serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, serum estradiol (E) levels, peak systolic velocity (PSV) of ovarian stromal blood, and Kupperman index (KI) score. However, serum luteinizing hormone (LH) levels and ovarian volume (OV) showed no significant statistical difference. Subgroup analyses showed that herbal paste and 3 months of treatment duration had a greater effect on the improvement of hormone levels. Besides, the occurrence of related adverse events in TKABP groups was lower than that in HT groups.
Our review suggests that TKABP appears to be an effective and safe measure for patients with POI, and the herbal paste may be superior. However, the methodological quality of included RCTs was unsatisfactory, and it is necessary to verify its effectiveness with furthermore standardized researches of rigorous design.
我们进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估温针灸联合耳穴贴压对卵巢功能不全(POI)的疗效。
从数据库建立至2019年9月30日,检索了以下八个数据库中的随机对照试验(RCT):PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、科学网、中国知网(CNKI)、中国生物医学数据库(CBM)、中文科技期刊数据库(维普)和万方数据库。证据质量采用推荐分级的评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法进行评估。
纳入了23项涉及1712例POI患者的RCT。与激素治疗(HT)组相比,温针灸联合耳穴贴压组的总有效率显著更高(RR:1.10;95%CI:1.04 - 1.17;P < 0.01,I² = 32%)。此外,温针灸联合耳穴贴压组在血清促卵泡生成素(FSH)水平、血清雌二醇(E)水平、卵巢基质血流收缩期峰值速度(PSV)和库珀曼指数(KI)评分方面有更好的改善。然而,血清促黄体生成素(LH)水平和卵巢体积(OV)无显著统计学差异。亚组分析表明,中药膏剂和3个月的治疗疗程对激素水平的改善作用更大。此外,温针灸联合耳穴贴压组相关不良事件的发生率低于HT组。
我们的综述表明,温针灸联合耳穴贴压似乎是POI患者的一种有效且安全的措施,中药膏剂可能更具优势。然而,纳入的RCT的方法学质量不令人满意,有必要通过进一步严格设计的标准化研究来验证其有效性。