• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本人成年人饮食相关温室气体排放和主要食物贡献:不同计算方法的比较。

Diet-related greenhouse gas emissions and major food contributors among Japanese adults: comparison of different calculation methods.

机构信息

Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo113-0033, Japan.

Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo113-0033, Japan.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2021 Apr;24(5):973-983. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019004750. Epub 2020 May 11.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980019004750
PMID:32389142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8025089/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) database for Japanese foods using three different approaches, compare the results of estimated diet-related GHGE and determine major food contributors among Japanese adults.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional. Three GHGE databases were developed: (1) a literature-based method including a literature review of life cycle assessment studies of Japanese foods and (2) production- and (3) consumption-based input-output tables (IOT)-applied methods using the Japanese IOT. All databases were linked to the Japanese food composition table and food consumption data. Diet-related GHGE was estimated based on each database and the 4-d dietary record data. Diet-related GHGE were compared in both total and food group level between the databases.

SETTING

Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

392 healthy adults aged 20-69 years.

RESULTS

The mean diet-related GHGE significantly differed according to the calculation methods: 4145 g CO2-equivalent (CO2-eq)/d by the literature-based method, 4031 g CO2-eq/d by the production-based method and 7392 g CO2-eq/d by the consumption-based IOT-applied methods. It significantly differed in food group level as well. Spearman's correlation coefficients between three methods ranged from 0·82 to 0·86. Irrespective of the methods, the top contributor to GHGE was meat (19·7-28·8 %) followed by fish and seafood (13·8-18·3 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the identified major food contributors to GHGE were comparable between the three methods, the estimated GHGE values significantly differed by calculation methods. This finding suggested that caution must be taken when interpreting the estimated diet-related GHGE values obtained using the different calculation methods of GHGE.

摘要

目的

使用三种不同方法为日本食品开发温室气体排放(GHGE)数据库,比较估算的饮食相关 GHGE 结果,并确定日本成年人的主要食物贡献者。

设计

横断面研究。开发了三种 GHGE 数据库:(1)基于文献的方法,包括对日本食品生命周期评估研究的文献综述,以及(2)生产和(3)使用日本投入产出表(IOT)的消费型投入产出表(IOT)方法。所有数据库均与日本食物成分表和食物消费数据相关联。根据每个数据库和 4 天饮食记录数据估算与饮食相关的 GHGE。在数据库之间比较总饮食相关 GHGE 和食物组水平的差异。

地点

日本。

参与者

392 名年龄在 20-69 岁之间的健康成年人。

结果

根据计算方法,饮食相关 GHGE 的平均值存在显著差异:文献法为 4145 克二氧化碳当量(CO2-eq)/天,生产法为 4031 克 CO2-eq/d,消费型 IOT 应用方法为 7392 克 CO2-eq/d。在食物组水平上也存在显著差异。三种方法之间的 Spearman 相关系数范围为 0.82 至 0.86。无论采用何种方法,GHGE 的最大贡献者均为肉类(19.7-28.8%),其次是鱼类和海鲜(13.8-18.3%)。

结论

尽管三种方法确定的 GHGE 主要食物贡献者相似,但估计的 GHGE 值因计算方法而异。这一发现表明,在使用不同的 GHGE 计算方法解释估计的饮食相关 GHGE 值时,必须谨慎。

相似文献

1
Diet-related greenhouse gas emissions and major food contributors among Japanese adults: comparison of different calculation methods.日本人成年人饮食相关温室气体排放和主要食物贡献:不同计算方法的比较。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Apr;24(5):973-983. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019004750. Epub 2020 May 11.
2
Association between diet-related greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient intake adequacy among Japanese adults.日本人饮食相关温室气体排放与营养素摄入充足程度之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 23;15(10):e0240803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240803. eCollection 2020.
3
Greenhouse gas emissions of self-selected diets in the UK and their association with diet quality: is energy under-reporting a problem?英国自选饮食的温室气体排放及其与饮食质量的关系:能量低报是一个问题吗?
Nutr J. 2018 Feb 21;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0338-x.
4
Trends in the contribution of greenhouse gas emissions from food and beverage purchases in Mexico: 1989-2020.墨西哥食品和饮料购买产生的温室气体排放贡献趋势:1989-2020 年。
Nutr J. 2024 May 18;23(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12937-024-00955-z.
5
Adherence to dietary recommendations for Swedish adults across categories of greenhouse gas emissions from food.遵循瑞典成年人在食物温室气体排放类别方面的饮食建议。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Dec;20(18):3381-3393. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002300. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
6
Dietary quality and dietary greenhouse gas emissions in the USA: a comparison of the planetary health diet index, healthy eating index-2015, and dietary approaches to stop hypertension.美国的饮食质量和饮食温室气体排放:行星健康饮食指数、健康饮食指数-2015 和停止高血压的饮食方法的比较。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Apr 2;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01581-y.
7
Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States Food System: Current and Healthy Diet Scenarios.美国食品系统中的温室气体排放:当前和健康饮食情景。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 May 7;53(9):5493-5503. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06828. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
8
Overconsumption of Energy and Excessive Discretionary Food Intake Inflates Dietary Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Australia.澳大利亚能源的过度消费和随意性食物摄入过多导致膳食温室气体排放量增加。
Nutrients. 2016 Oct 31;8(11):690. doi: 10.3390/nu8110690.
9
How low can dietary greenhouse gas emissions be reduced without impairing nutritional adequacy, affordability and acceptability of the diet? A modelling study to guide sustainable food choices.在不损害饮食的营养充足性、可承受性和可接受性的前提下,饮食中的温室气体排放能降低到多低水平?一项指导可持续食物选择的建模研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Oct;19(14):2662-74. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016000653. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Halving food-related greenhouse gas emissions can be achieved by redistributing meat consumption: Progressive optimization results of the NutriNet-Santé cohort.通过重新分配肉类消费,可将与食物相关的温室气体排放量减少一半:NutriNet-Santé 队列的渐进式优化结果。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 1;789:147901. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147901. Epub 2021 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between adherence to Japanese food guide spinning top and nutrient density, climate impacts, and monetary cost: findings from the Saitama Prefecture Nutrition Survey 2017.日本食物指南陀螺的遵循情况与营养密度、气候影响及货币成本之间的关联:2017年埼玉县营养调查结果
Eur J Nutr. 2025 Aug 20;64(6):262. doi: 10.1007/s00394-025-03776-w.
2
A reverse J-shaped association between adherence to planetary health diet and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in Japan: a cross-sectional prefecture-level ecological study.日本遵循行星健康饮食与全因死亡率及特定病因死亡率之间的反向J形关联:一项基于县级层面的横断面生态研究。
J Nutr Sci. 2025 Jul 2;14:e45. doi: 10.1017/jns.2025.10018. eCollection 2025.
3
Development of the Food Systems-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions Factor Database Using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016-2018).利用韩国国家健康与营养检查调查(2016 - 2018年)开发食品系统相关温室气体排放因子数据库
Environ Health Perspect. 2025 Jun;133(6):67018. doi: 10.1289/EHP15534. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
4
Application of Global Warming Potential Star (GWP*) Values to the AUSNUT 2011-13 Food Composition Database: Creation of the .全球变暖潜能值星标(GWP*)在2011 - 13年澳大利亚国家营养食品成分数据库中的应用:. 的创建
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 27;17(3):464. doi: 10.3390/nu17030464.
5
Integrating environmental sustainability into food-based dietary guidelines in the Nordic countries.将环境可持续性纳入北欧国家基于食物的膳食指南。
Food Nutr Res. 2024 Oct 25;68. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10792. eCollection 2024.
6
Association between Diet-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mortality among Japanese Adults: The Japan Collaborative Cohort Study.饮食相关温室气体排放与日本成年人死亡率之间的关联:日本合作队列研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Nov;132(11):117002. doi: 10.1289/EHP14935. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
7
What Environmental Metrics Are Used in Scientific Research to Estimate the Impact of Human Diets?在科学研究中,使用哪些环境指标来估计人类饮食的影响?
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 19;16(18):3166. doi: 10.3390/nu16183166.
8
Contribution of fortified foods and dietary supplements to total nutrient intakes and their adequacy in Japanese adults.强化食品和膳食补充剂对日本成年人总营养素摄入量的贡献及其充足性。
BMC Nutr. 2024 Sep 27;10(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s40795-024-00935-w.
9
Traditional japanese diet score and the sustainable development goals by a global comparative ecological study.传统日式饮食评分与全球比较生态研究的可持续发展目标。
Nutr J. 2024 Mar 21;23(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12937-024-00936-2.
10
Diet-Attributable Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Acute Myocardial Infarction in Costa Rica Heart Study.哥斯达黎加心脏研究中的饮食归因温室气体排放与急性心肌梗死。
Nutrients. 2023 Dec 30;16(1):138. doi: 10.3390/nu16010138.

本文引用的文献

1
Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States Food System: Current and Healthy Diet Scenarios.美国食品系统中的温室气体排放:当前和健康饮食情景。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 May 7;53(9):5493-5503. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06828. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
2
Development and validation of an individual sustainable diet index in the NutriNet-Santé study cohort.开发和验证 NutriNet-Santé 研究队列中个人可持续饮食指数。
Br J Nutr. 2019 May;121(10):1166-1177. doi: 10.1017/S0007114519000369. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
3
Greenhouse gas emissions, total food spending and diet quality by share of household food spending on red meat: results from a nationally representative sample of US households.温室气体排放、家庭食物总支出和按家庭在红肉上支出的比例划分的饮食质量:来自美国全国代表性家庭样本的结果。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jul;22(10):1794-1806. doi: 10.1017/S136898001800407X. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
4
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
5
FFQ versus repeated 24-h recalls for estimating diet-related environmental impact.使用食物频率问卷与多次 24 小时回顾法评估饮食相关的环境影响。
Nutr J. 2019 Jan 8;18(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0425-z.
6
Greenhouse gas emissions and water footprints of typical dietary patterns in India.印度典型饮食模式的温室气体排放和水足迹。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 1;643:1411-1418. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.258. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
7
Greenhouse gas emissions and energy use associated with production of individual self-selected US diets.与美国个人自选饮食生产相关的温室气体排放和能源使用。
Environ Res Lett. 2018 Apr;13(4):044004. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aab0ac. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
8
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers.通过生产者和消费者减少食物对环境的影响。
Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):987-992. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216.
9
Multi-indicator sustainability assessment of global food systems.全球粮食系统的多指标可持续性评估。
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 27;9(1):848. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03308-7.
10
Greenhouse gas emissions of self-selected diets in the UK and their association with diet quality: is energy under-reporting a problem?英国自选饮食的温室气体排放及其与饮食质量的关系:能量低报是一个问题吗?
Nutr J. 2018 Feb 21;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0338-x.